e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended June 30,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number
000-51539
Vistaprint N.V.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
98-0417483
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
Hudsonweg 8
5928 LW Venlo
The Netherlands
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone
number, including area code:
31-77-850-7700
Securities Registered Pursuant
to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Ordinary Shares, 0.01 par value
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of
1934. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
|
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the ordinary shares held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,329,109,872 on
December 31, 2009 (the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter)
based on the last reported sale price of the registrants
ordinary shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
As of August 20, 2010, there were outstanding 43,943,829
ordinary shares, par value 0.01 per share, of Vistaprint
N.V.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end
of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. Portions of such
proxy statement are incorporated by reference into
Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of Part III of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
EXPLANATORY
NOTE
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
is being filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), by Vistaprint N.V., a
Dutch limited liability company (nammlooze vennootschap),
as successor to Vistaprint Limited., a company incorporated
under the laws of Bermuda. Pursuant to a scheme of arrangement
under Bermuda law described in Part I, Item 1,
Business Change of Domicile, on
August 31, 2009 all of the previously outstanding common
shares of Vistaprint Limited were cancelled and each holder of
cancelled Vistaprint Limited common shares received ordinary
shares of Vistaprint N.V. As a result of the scheme of
arrangement and share exchange transaction, Vistaprint Limited
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vistaprint N.V. Pursuant to
Rule 12g-3
under the Exchange Act, Vistaprint N.V. is filing this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
which includes the full fiscal year ended June 30, 2010
including the activity of Vistaprint Limited before the
succession, as the successor issuer for reporting purposes under
the Exchange Act.
VISTAPRINT
N.V.
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the documents that we incorporate by reference in this
report contain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of
our management and information currently available to our
management. Use of words such as believes,
expects, anticipates,
intends, plans, estimates,
goal, should, likely or
similar expressions, indicate a forward-looking statement. While
we may elect to update these forward-looking statements, we
specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our
expectations change. Important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, those set forth under the
heading Risk Factors.
Overview
We are a leading online provider of coordinated portfolios of
customized marketing products and services to micro businesses
worldwide. We offer a broad spectrum of complementary products
and services ranging from printed business cards, brochures and
post cards to apparel, invitations and announcements, holiday
cards, calendars, creative design services, copywriting
services, direct mail services, promotional gifts, signage,
website design and hosting services and email marketing
services. While we focus primarily on micro business marketing
products and services, consumers also purchase many of our
products, such as invitations and announcements, greeting cards,
and calendars.
We offer compelling value to our customers through innovative
technology, a broad selection of customized products and
services, low pricing and personalized customer service. While
we offer a broad selection of designs and formats, we seek to
reduce manufacturing complexity and costs by using limited
characteristics that can be reconfigured and combined. This
reduces our costs versus comparable marketing products and
services produced using traditional methods. This approach has
allowed us to successfully penetrate the large, fragmented and
geographically dispersed micro business and consumer markets.
We have standardized, automated and integrated the design and
production process, from design conceptualization to product
shipment and service delivery. Customers can use our proprietary
design software to easily create and order full-color,
personalized, professional-looking marketing products and
services, without any prior design training or experience.
Customers have access to over 70,000 graphic designs, design
templates, photographs and illustrations as well as logo design
services and content suggestions. We are also able to
automatically match and adapt graphic content from one product
format to another, which allows us to generate and display
complementary products and services.
Our proprietary Internet-based order processing systems receive
and store tens of thousands of individual orders on a daily
basis and, using complex algorithms, organize these orders for
efficient production and delivery to our customers. Through our
production technologies and highly automated manufacturing
facilities, we are able to significantly reduce the costs and
inefficiencies associated with traditional production and can
provide customized finished products in as little as three days
from design to delivery. During the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2010, our customers placed an average of
approximately 52,000 customized orders per day.
Our total revenues have grown from $6.1 million for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2001 to $670.0 million for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. All of our revenue
growth has been organic.
3
Market and
Industry Background
The Marketplace
for Micro Business Marketing Products and Services
We focus on providing marketing products and services for the
micro business market, generally businesses or organizations
with fewer than 10 employees, and often with fewer than
5 employees. We believe that there are approximately
50 million businesses with fewer than 10 employees in
the United States, Canada, and the European Union and that these
micro businesses undergo frequent changes with many forming and
dissolving each year, creating a large market for business
identity products and services in addition to marketing products
and services. We also believe that, in response to the growth of
the Internet and the emergence of digital production
technologies, micro businesses are shifting from traditional
suppliers of customized marketing products and media toward
online alternatives.
In the past, a business seeking customized marketing products
and services could either hire a designer to develop and
coordinate the production of marketing materials or produce
printed materials themselves using desktop software and an
inkjet or laser printer. A designer can produce a professionally
coordinated portfolio of marketing products and services, but
this is a significantly more costly and time-consuming
alternative, whereas traditional self-service typically produces
less sophisticated and lower quality output. We believe that
neither alternative is convenient or cost-effective for micro
businesses, which typically lack the resources or skills to
generate satisfactory results using either approach.
Online commerce provides significant advantages and
opportunities to micro business customers seeking customized
marketing products and services at affordable prices. These
customers do not typically need the large quantities that are
traditionally required to achieve low
per-unit
pricing and do not maintain dedicated procurement departments to
negotiate pricing effectively. We believe the high price,
inconvenience and complexity of traditionally procuring
customized marketing products and services have historically
dissuaded micro business customers from purchasing these
products and services. We believe that the highly fragmented,
geographically dispersed nature of the micro business market is
ideally suited for Internet-based procurement, as the Internet
provides a standardized interface through web browsers,
availability seven days a week, 24 hours a day, the ability
to offer a wide selection of products and services, and the
opportunity to efficiently aggregate individual orders into
larger and more efficient production units.
We believe that the micro business market has been underserved
by expensive traditional marketing alternatives. Further, we
believe that the sophistication of marketing efforts by larger
businesses demonstrates to micro business owners the
attractiveness of multi-format coordinated marketing portfolios.
We also believe there is a significant advantage to combining
the Internets ability to reach these highly fragmented
markets with an integrated design and production process that
can rapidly deliver sophisticated, high quality marketing
products and services. In addition, we believe that coordinated
portfolios of marketing products and services can help micro
businesses appear more competent and professional, which can
enhance their customer relationships and prospects for success.
The Marketplace
for Customized Products and Services for the Home and
Family
While we focus primarily on micro business marketing products
and services, many of our product formats are also purchased by
consumers seeking customized announcements, greeting cards,
calendars, stationery, and personalized gifts. In the past, many
such products were supplied by an industry comprising print
manufacturing wholesalers and local retailers, such as
stationery stores. Compared with todays Internet-based
alternatives, traditional offerings were relatively limited,
prices were significantly higher, and delivery often required
longer lead times. Graphic designs were limited and it was
rarely possible to incorporate full color photography into the
design.
4
Online commerce combined with digital production technologies
provides significant advantages and opportunities to consumers
seeking high quality personalized announcements, greeting cards,
calendars, stationery and personalized gifts at affordable
prices. Although the overall market opportunity for these types
of products is very large, Vistaprint currently approaches this
space opportunistically. We primarily market our
consumer-oriented products to our existing base of micro
business customers, many of whom also have a desire to purchase
personalized products for home and family use.
Value for
Customers
We provide our customers with the following benefits:
Low Prices and
Small Quantities
We sell custom designed and manufactured products and services
in quantities that are appropriate for micro businesses, which
can often be as few as a single unit. At the same time, our high
volume, highly automated production facilities produce small
quantity orders at low cost, allowing us to sell at low prices.
Portfolios of
Coordinated Marketing Products and Services
Our proprietary, web-based design software uses algorithms to
easily and automatically create high quality, personalized,
professional looking designs from our portfolio of high quality
photographic and illustration stock images, thousands of layouts
and templates, dozens of fonts and dozens of color schemes.
Customers can also easily incorporate their own uploaded
photographs, logos or complete designs. Once a design is
complete, we offer our customers a range of matching products
and related services, including signage, websites and email
marketing, business identity, direct mail services, apparel and
promotional gifts.
Wide Range of
Graphic Design Options
Most customers use our web browser-based design and editing
software to create personalized materials. In addition,
customers are able to upload their own designs to our system.
Customers who want us to perform some or all of the design work
can contact our design service representatives, who will provide
custom designs.
5
Broad Range of
Products and Services
We offer a broad spectrum of products and services for the
business and consumer markets, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paper based
|
|
Non-paper based
|
|
Electronic and Marketing
Services
|
|
|
|
brochures
|
|
|
|
banners
|
|
|
|
caricature content
|
|
|
business cards
|
|
|
|
car door magnets
|
|
|
|
email marketing services
|
|
|
data sheets
|
|
|
|
decals
|
|
|
|
logo design
|
|
|
desk and wall calendars
|
|
|
|
hats
|
|
|
|
mailing services
|
|
|
envelopes
|
|
|
|
key chains
|
|
|
|
website design and hosting
|
|
|
folded cards
|
|
|
|
lawn signs
|
|
|
|
online search profiles
|
|
|
flyers
|
|
|
|
pens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
holiday cards
|
|
|
|
refrigerator magnets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
invitations and announcements
|
|
|
|
rubber stamps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
letterhead
|
|
|
|
t-shirts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
note cards and note pads
|
|
|
|
tote bags
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
presentation folders
|
|
|
|
mouse pads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return address labels
|
|
|
|
mugs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
standard and oversized postcards
|
|
|
|
luggage tags
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sticky notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
personalized notebooks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
photo flip books
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
folded business cards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
personalized stickers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mailing labels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Quality
Production
For our longer run print jobs, we typically use commercial
offset presses that normally are used for conventional long run,
high quality print jobs, such as high end consumer goods
packaging, in which typical quantities run into the thousands or
more. For our shorter run print jobs, we typically employ
commercial digital printing equipment. For a number of our
non-paper-based products, such as hats, t-shirts, self-inking
stamps, signage, pens, and mugs, we have acquired a wide range
of advanced digital production equipment and configured these
machines in dedicated production cells that are customized for
the particular application. In addition, we have developed
proprietary production methods to improve our efficiency and the
quality of our products. Our quality assurance systems employ
principles of world-class manufacturing designed to ensure that
we consistently deliver high-quality products.
Fast Design to
Delivery Turnaround
We design, produce, process and deliver multiple high-quality,
customized orders in as little as three days.
Do It Yourself
Service and Assisted Service
Our easy to use online tools and design software allow customers
to create their own marketing products. Customers who need help
during the design or checkout process can access customer
service agents via phone, email or chat in multiple languages.
6
Lowest Price and
Satisfaction Guarantees
We demonstrate our confidence in the quality and pricing of our
products by offering an unconditional lowest price guarantee on
many of our products and an unconditional guarantee of customer
satisfaction.
The Customer
Design and Purchase Experience
We recognize that our customers have differing needs, skills,
and expertise, and we offer a corresponding range of customer
service options. Our websites offer a full complement of tools
and features allowing customers to create a product design or
upload their own complete design, and place an order on a
completely self-service basis. Those customers in Dutch,
English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish speaking markets
who have started the design process but find that they require
some guidance or design help can, with the assistance of our
customer sales and support personnel, obtain real-time design or
ordering assistance. We also offer email support to customers of
our other localized websites.
Designing
Online
Customers visiting our websites can select the type of product
they wish to design from our broad range of available products.
When a product type has been selected, the customer can initiate
the design process by using our predefined industry styles and
theme categories, by entering one or more keywords in our image
search tool, or by uploading the customers own design. If
the customer chooses to do a keyword search, our automated
design logic will, in real time, create and display to the
customer a variety of product templates containing images
related to the customers keyword. When the customer
chooses a particular template for personalization, our
user-friendly, browser-based product design and editing tools
are downloaded from our servers to the customers browser
program. We enable the customer to quickly and easily perform a
wide range of design and editing functions on the selected
design, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
entering and editing text;
|
|
|
|
cropping images or entirely replacing images with other images;
|
|
|
|
repositioning product elements using conventional
drag-and-drop
functionality;
|
|
|
|
changing fonts or font characteristics;
|
|
|
|
uploading customer images or logos;
|
|
|
|
changing color schemes; and
|
|
|
|
zooming in and out.
|
Customer Support
Experience
We are committed to providing high levels of customer service
and support. We offer
e-mail
support for customers on most of our localized websites. We
augment our
e-mail
support and our online tools with knowledgeable, trained
service, sales and design support staff that service our markets.
Our
English-language
customer service, sales and design support center is located in
Montego Bay, Jamaica. Our Dutch and
German-language
support is in our new facility in Berlin, Germany. Our French,
Italian and
Spanish-language
support is in our new facility in Tunis, Tunisia. These three
facilities were staffed by over 430 customer service, sales and
design support employees as of
7
June 30, 2010. Using our proprietary design software
applications, combined with voice over internet protocol
telephone transmission technology and call center management
tools, we believe our agents and designers provide a high
quality customer service experience.
Post-Design
Check-Out Process
Customers purchasing products check out either via a standard
e-commerce
self-service shopping basket or by providing their order and
payment information via telephone to one of our service agents.
We offer a variety of secure payment methods, with the payment
options varying to meet the customs and practices of each of our
localized sites. These payment alternatives include credit or
debit card, check, money order, wire transfer or other methods.
During the check-out process, customers are also typically
presented with offers for additional products and services from
us and our marketing partners. Using our automated VistaMatch
product design capabilities, customers who designed products
using our content can be shown automatically generated images of
matching products. For example, a customer purchasing business
cards can automatically be shown matching return address labels,
magnets, calendars, T-Shirts, pens, websites and similar
products. Each of these automatically generated product offers
can be quickly and simply added to the customers order.
Our Competitive
Advantage
We have invested significantly in three core areas to build a
strong advantage versus traditional competitors:
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary software and process technology that drives many
aspects of our business
|
|
|
|
Mass customization manufacturing
|
|
|
|
Direct marketing expertise
|
We have developed a
direct-to-customer
solution using proprietary Internet-based software technologies
to market and merchandise our products and services to our
customers as well as standardize, automate and integrate the
design and production process, from concept through finished
product shipment and service delivery. Our software can match
and adapt graphic elements from one product format to another,
which allows us to offer a coordinated portfolio of products and
services. Automation and integration allow us to provide high
quality, custom design products and services at affordable
prices for the micro business or consumer.
Additionally, as we continue to expand geographically, we expect
to continue to build upon our competitive advantages versus
traditional, smaller, local graphic design and print shops. We
have built our service to scale worldwide, and as of
June 30, 2010, we serve customers in more than
120 countries. In the year ended June 30, 2010, we
generated 45% of our revenues from websites that are targeted at
countries other than the United States. We have a European
marketing and administrative office in Barcelona, Spain and a
European production facility in Venlo, the Netherlands. We have
17 localized websites serving European countries. We operate
localized websites for Japan, New Zealand, and Australia, which
we intend to primarily service from our new production facility
in Deer Park, Australia and marketing offices in Sydney,
Australia. Our localization and language map content management
system software facilitates our entry into new markets and
allows us to make changes to all of our localized websites with
the same software and relatively simple, standardized and
low-cost procedures. We have also expanded our customer service,
sales and design support with the addition of offices in Tunis,
Tunisia and Berlin, Germany that service the Dutch, French,
German, Italian, and Spanish speaking markets.
8
Our Proprietary
Software and Process Technology
We rely on our advanced proprietary technology to market to,
attract and retain our customers, enable customers to create
graphic designs and place orders on our websites, and aggregate
and simultaneously produce multiple orders from all over the
world. This technology includes:
Design and
Document Creation Technologies
Our design creation technologies enable customers, by themselves
or together with the assistance of our design support staff, to
design and create high quality marketing materials from their
homes or offices. Our document model architecture and technology
employs Internet-compatible data structures to define, process
and store product designs as a set of separately searchable,
combinable and modifiable component elements. In comparison to
traditional document storage and presentation technologies, such
as bitmap or PDFs, this architecture provides significant
advantages in storing, manipulating and modifying design
elements, allowing us to generate customized initial and later
matching product design options automatically in real time.
Our auto-matching design software algorithmically generates
customized product designs in real-time based on key-word
searches, enabling professional-looking graphic layouts to be
easily and quickly created by customers without graphic arts
training.
VistaStudio is our product design and editing software
suite that is downloaded to our customers computer from
our server and runs in the customers browser. This
browser-based software provides real-time client-side editing
capabilities plus extensive system scalability. A wide variety
of layouts, color schemes and fonts are provided and an
extensive selection of high quality photographs and
illustrations are currently available for use by customers in
product design. Customers can also upload their own images and
logos for incorporation into their product designs.
Our Internet-based, remote, real-time, co-creativity and project
management application and database enables customers and our
design agents to cooperatively design a product across the
Internet in real-time, while simultaneously engaging in voice
communication.
Our Internet-based website design and layout tool enables
customers with no experience in creating websites to quickly
design and publish a website. The interface provides customers
with the ability to update their content in a simple editing
environment that closely mimics what the website will look like
when published. Some of the features that customers can add to
their website using this tool include images, maps, credit-card
payment processing, downloadable files and contact forms.
Customers seeking to improve their ranking among search engines
can modify their content and search keywords through a simple
interface. Customers can change their website design in real
time and can choose from hundreds of different templates
categorized by industry and style. In addition, we offer a
platform for customers to self-manage
e-mail
marketing solutions for their business.
Pre-Press and
Print Production Technologies
Our pre-production and production technologies efficiently
process and aggregate customer orders, prepare orders for
high-quality production and manage production, addressing and
shipment of these orders.
DrawDocs is our automated pre-printing press technology
that prepares customer documents received over the Internet for
high-resolution printing. DrawDocs ensures that the
high-resolution press-ready version of the customers
design will produce a printed product that is exactly like the
graphic design that was displayed in the customers
Internet browser.
Our VistaBridge technology allows us to efficiently
store, process and aggregate tens of thousands of Internet
orders every day. The system automates the workflow into our
high-volume
9
production facilities by using complex algorithms to aggregate
pending individual print jobs having similar printing parameters
and combine the compatible orders into a single production run
or set of homogenous production runs. The technology calculates
the optimal allocation of print orders that will result in the
lowest production cost but still ensure on-time delivery. In our
fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 we averaged approximately
52,000 orders per day and orders often contain multiple
customized items, which can result in more than 100,000
individual stored items awaiting production. Our aggregation
software regularly scans these pending jobs and analyzes a
variety of production characteristics, including quantity, type
and format of raw material, color versus black and white, single
or double-sided print, delivery date, shipping location, type of
production system being used and type of product. For printed
products, the VistaBridge software then automatically aggregates
orders with similar production characteristics from multiple
customers into a single document image that is transferred to
either a digital press or to an automated plating system that
produces offset printing plates. For example, in the case of
business cards being printed on large offset presses, up to
143 separate customer orders can be simultaneously printed
as a single aggregated print file.
Viper is our workflow and production management software
for tracking and managing our worldwide production facilities on
a networked basis. Viper monitors and manages bar-code driven
production batch and order management, pick and pack operations,
and addressing and shipping of orders.
Marketing
Technologies
We use our marketing technologies to test changes to our
websites and new product offers in order to enhance our
offerings and customer value proposition. In addition, we
automatically generate and display additional products
incorporating the customers initial design, facilitating
the cross-sale of related products and services.
Split Run Testing technology assigns our website visitors
to test and control groups. Depending on the test group to which
a visitor is assigned, he or she can be shown slightly different
versions of our website. This technology permits us to evaluate
changes to our websites on a relatively small but still
statistically significant test group prior to general release.
We then use analytics software to correlate the changes on the
site with the visitors browsing and purchasing behavior
and to compare our profitability for a given pair of test and
control groups. Our testing engine allows us to run hundreds of
these tests simultaneously on our websites, reducing the time to
take an idea from concept to full deployment and allowing us to
quickly identify and roll-out the most promising and profitable
ideas and promotions to maximize our customer value proposition.
VistaMatch Software automatically generates and displays
one or more additional customized product designs based upon a
customers existing design. Design elements and customer
information are automatically transferred to the additional
design so that customers do not spend additional time searching
for other products or templates or re-entering data. For
example, a customer purchasing business cards can automatically
be shown matching return address labels, magnets, calendars,
T-Shirts,
pens, websites and similar products. Each of these automatically
generated product offers can be quickly and simply added to the
customers order..
Automated Cross-Sell and Up-Sell technology permits us to
show a customer, while the customer is in the process of
purchasing a product, marketing offers for one or more
additional or related products. We use this technology to
dynamically determine the most effective products to offer to
customers based on a number of variables including how the
customer reached the website, the customers purchase
history, the contents of the customers shopping basket and
the various pages within the website that the customer has
visited.
Localization/Language Map is our content management
system that permits all of our localized websites, and the
changes to those websites, to be managed by the same software
engine. Text and
10
image components of our web pages are separated, translated and
stored in our managed content database. If a piece of content is
reused, the desired content automatically appears in its correct
language on all websites, enabling our localized websites,
regardless of the language or country specific content, to share
a single set of web pages that automatically use the appropriate
content, significantly reducing our software installation,
deployment and maintenance costs.
Technology
Development
We intend to continue developing and enhancing our proprietary
and licensed software programs and our manufacturing processes.
As of June 30, 2010, more than 300 of our employees were
engaged in technology development. Our technology and
development expenses were $78.4 million,
$60.9 million, and $44.8 million in the years ended
June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
We have designed our website technologies and infrastructure to
scale to accommodate future growth in the number of customer
visits, orders, and product and service offerings. This
Internet-based architecture makes our applications highly
scalable and offers our customers fast system responsiveness
when editing document designs. Our production technologies for
aggregating jobs in preparation for manufacturing are designed
to readily scale as we grow. The more individual jobs received
in a time period, the more efficiently aggregations, or gangs,
of similar jobs can be assembled and moved to the printing
system, thereby maximizing the efficient use of the production
equipment and increasing overall system throughput.
Our customer-facing systems infrastructure, web and database
servers are hosted in Bermuda and we maintain data centers for
backend server operations in our Dutch and Canadian facilities.
Our site systems are operated 24 hours a day, seven days a
week. We believe our IT solution is highly scalable, requiring
only the addition of relatively inexpensive servers and
processors.
Security is provided at multiple levels in both our hardware and
software. We use 128-bit encryption technology for secure
transmission of confidential personal information between
customers and our web servers. All customer data is held behind
firewalls. In addition, customer credit card information is
encrypted. We use fraud prevention technology to identify
potentially fraudulent transactions.
Our Mass
Customization Manufacturing and Delivery Process
Our high-volume, standardized, scalable production processes are
driven by sophisticated proprietary software described above.
Our technologies are designed to readily scale as the number of
print orders received per day increases. As more individual
print jobs are received, similar jobs can be aggregated and
moved to the printing system more efficiently, thereby
optimizing the use of the printing equipment and increasing
overall system throughput. Our proprietary workflow and
production management software allows us to deliver final
products to customers in as few as three days. We believe that
our strategy of seeking to automate and systematize our service
and production systems enables us to reach and serve small-scale
customers more effectively than our competitors.
With the improvements we have made in automating the design and
production process, we can produce and ship an order the same
day we send it to production, which results in minimal inventory
levels and reduced working capital requirements. We can also
produce complementary custom products in a timely fashion,
allowing us to produce and deliver multi-part orders quickly and
efficiently. This allows us to produce high-quality, low-priced
products at high margins even though our average order values
are low by traditional standards.
As orders are received, we automatically route production jobs,
often aggregated by our VistaBridge technology, to the type and
location of production system that is most appropriate and
11
cost efficient for the type of product ordered. Printed products
ordered in larger quantities, such as business cards, postcards,
letterhead and the like, are typically produced using a single
pass on state of the art automated, high-volume, offset,
professional quality printing presses. Products produced in
smaller quantities or using special materials, such as holiday
cards, apparel, signage, invitations, return address labels, and
magnets, are typically produced on digital equipment. In most
cases, individual orders from multiple customers are aggregated
to create larger jobs, allowing multiple orders to be
simultaneously produced.
Our proprietary Viper software and sophisticated automation
solutions combined with software from our suppliers allow us to
integrate and automate the manufacturing process. This process
includes:
|
|
|
|
|
the pre-press process, during which digital files are
transferred directly from our computer servers to the
manufacturing system at the appropriate production facility;
|
|
|
|
automatic plate loading systems that eliminate all manual steps
of offset printing other than a quick toaster like
insertion and removal of plates;
|
|
|
|
automatic ink key setting whereby ink fountain keys, which
control color application, are set automatically from an
analysis of the pixelized data used to image plates; and
|
|
|
|
automated color management, which adjusts digital images prior
to printing, assuring that colors match when processed across
different printing presses and substrates.
|
Once printed, individual paper product orders are separated
using computerized cutting systems, assembled, packaged,
addressed using Vistaprints proprietary Viper software,
and shipped to the customer. Viper processes then communicate
electronically with shipping carriers, assuring smooth tracking
and information flow to the customer until final confirmation of
delivery.
Requiring as little as 60 seconds of pre-press, printing and
cutting labor for a typical order of 250 business cards, versus
an hour or more for traditional printers, this process enables
us to print many high quality customized orders using a fraction
of the labor of typical traditional printers. Our quality
control systems are designed around the principles of world
class manufacturing to ensure that we consistently deliver
premium, high quality products.
Sales and
Marketing
We have developed expertise in direct marketing to target new
customers across various channels and to drive more sessions on
our websites, as well as to retain existing customers.
To acquire new customers, we employ sophisticated direct
marketing technologies and management practices using the
Internet,
e-mail, and
traditional direct marketing mailings. Through channels such as
our own permission-based outbound emails and direct URL type-in,
we are able to secure orders at relatively low cost. In
addition, many of the products that we offer our customers
contain the Vistaprint logo and reference our website. Our
products, by their nature, are purchased by our customers for
the purpose of being further distributed to business or personal
contacts. As such, the appearance of our brand on the products
yields broad and ongoing distribution and visibility of our
brand and presents the opportunity for beneficial viral and
word-of-mouth
advertising.
We have developed tools and techniques for measuring the result
of each provider of direct marketing services and of each
marketing message or product or service offer. In addition, our
customer split-run testing technology allows us to divide
prospective or returning customers visiting our websites into
sub-groups
that are presented with different product and service
selections, prices
and/or
marketing messages. This allows us to test or introduce new
products and services on a
12
limited basis, test various price points on products and
services or test different marketing messages related to product
or service offerings.
We place advertisements on the websites of companies such as
eBay and Amazon, contract for targeted
e-mail
marketing services from vendors such as MyPoints, and contract
for placement on leading search engines such as Google and
Yahoo!. We maintain affiliate programs with companies under
which we permit program members to include hyperlinks to our
websites on their sites and in promotional materials and we pay
program members for sales generated through those links.
We have also entered into a variety of strategic partnerships
that facilitate access to customers that would be difficult to
reach through traditional direct marketing channels. We focus on
cultivating opportunities with strategic importance in the micro
business marketplace and seek to partner with companies that
have large numbers of well established micro business customer
relationships.
For example, we have developed a scalable capability to address
the market of customers who choose to order customized products
and services through retail and online properties of office
superstores, retailers and copy storefronts, through strategic
partnerships with third parties and we have also entered into
strategic partnerships with online and software vendors to small
businesses. We believe we are positioned to develop additional
relationships in similar markets.
In addition, we create co-branded versions of our websites and
web landing pages for companies in a variety of industries, such
as franchised organizations seeking brand consistency. In
general, these arrangements involve payment of a commission or
revenue share to these companies for sales of our products and
services generated through these websites and web pages.
Intellectual
Property
We seek to protect our proprietary rights through a combination
of patent, copyright, trade secret, and trademark law and
contractual restrictions, such as confidentiality agreements and
proprietary rights agreements. We enter into confidentiality and
proprietary rights agreements with our employees, consultants
and business partners, and control access to and distribution of
our proprietary information.
We currently hold 47 issued patents in the United States and
other countries. Subject to our continued payment of required
patent maintenance fees, our currently issued patents will
expire between December 2017 and July 2028. In addition, we
currently have more than 50 patent applications pending in the
United States and other countries and we intend to pursue
corresponding patent coverage in additional countries to the
extent we believe such coverage is justified, appropriate, and
cost efficient. Our issued patents relate generally to our
automated process for receiving, processing, aggregating and
producing multiple individual print jobs and to automated
processes for facilitating document creation at a client system.
From time to time, we are involved in lawsuits or disputes in
which third parties claim that we have violated their
intellectual property rights. In addition, a third party may
claim that we have improperly obtained or used its confidential
or proprietary information. We have in the past received letters
from third parties that state that these third parties have
patent rights that cover aspects of the technology that we use
in our business and that the third parties believe we are
obligated to license in order to continue to use such
technology. Any claims that our products or processes infringe
the intellectual property rights of others, regardless of the
merit or resolution of such claims, could cause us to incur
significant costs in responding to, defending, and resolving
such claims, and may divert the efforts and attention of our
management and technical personnel away from our business. You
can find more information about the risks relating to our
intellectual property rights in Item 1A of Part I,
Risk Factors in this report.
13
Our primary brand is Vistaprint. We hold trademark
registrations for the Vistaprint trademark in 21 jurisdictions,
including registrations in our major markets of the United
States, the European Union, Canada, Australia and Japan.
The content of our websites and our downloadable software tools
are copyrighted materials protected under international
copyright laws and conventions. These materials are further
protected by the Terms of Use posted on each of our websites,
which customers acknowledge and accept during the purchase
process. We currently own or control a number of Internet domain
names used in connection with our various websites, including
Vistaprint.com and related names. Most of our localized sites
use local country code domain names, such as Vistaprint.it for
our Italian site.
Competition
The markets for both customized marketing products and services
for micro businesses and custom consumer products are large,
evolving and highly competitive. We compete on the basis of
breadth of product offerings, price, convenience, quality,
design content, design options and tools, customer and design
services, ease of use, and production and delivery speed. It is
our intention to offer high quality design, production and
marketing services at low price points and in doing so, offer
our customers an attractive value proposition. Our current
competition includes one or a combination of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
traditional storefront printing and graphic design companies;
|
|
|
|
office superstores, drug store chains, food retailers and other
major retailers targeting small business and consumer markets
such as Staples, UPS Stores, Office Depot, Costco, CVS,
Schleker, Walgreens, Carrefour and Wal-Mart;
|
|
|
|
wholesale printers such as Taylor Corporation and Business Cards
Tomorrow;
|
|
|
|
other online printing and graphic design companies, many of
which provide printed products and services similar to ours,
such as Overnight Prints, 123Print, Moo.com and UPrinting for
small business marketing products and services; TinyPrints,
Invitation Consultants and Fine Stationery for invitations and
announcements;
|
|
|
|
self-service desktop design and publishing using personal
computer software with a laser or inkjet printer and specialty
paper;
|
|
|
|
other email marketing services companies such as Constant
Contact and iContact;
|
|
|
|
other website design and hosting companies such as United
Internet, Web.com and Network Solutions;
|
|
|
|
other suppliers of custom apparel, promotional products and
customized gifts, such as Zazzle, Café Press and
Customization Mall;
|
|
|
|
online photo product companies, such as Kodak Gallery, Snapfish
by HP, Shutterfly and Photobox; and
|
|
|
|
other internet firms, such as Google (Picasa), Yahoo (Flickr),
Amazon, Facebook, MySpace, the Knot and many smaller firms.
|
As we expand our geographic reach, product and service portfolio
and customer base, our competition increases. Our geographic
expansion creates competition with competitors with a
multi-national presence and experienced local vendors. Recent
product offerings such as websites, email marketing, apparel and
photo products have resulted in new competition as a result of
us entering
14
those markets. We encounter competition from large retailers
offering a wide breadth of products and highly focused companies
concentrated on a subset of our customers or product offerings.
Many of our current and potential competitors have longer
operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand
recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and
other resources than we do. Our competitors may enter into
strategic alliances to provide graphic design and production
services with larger, more established and well-financed
companies, potentially at more favorable terms than we could
obtain. Additionally, these competitors have research and
development capabilities that may allow them to develop new or
improved products and services that may compete with the
products and services that we market. New technologies and the
expansion of existing technologies, such as local search,
e-mails,
electronic files and social media which may serve as substitutes
for our products and services, may increase competitive
pressures on us. Increased competition may result in reduced
operating margins as well as loss of market share and brand
recognition. We may be unable to compete successfully against
current and future competitors, and competitive pressures facing
us could harm our business and prospects.
Business Segment
and Geographic Information
We operate in one business segment: offering micro businesses
and consumers a broad range of brand identity and promotional
products, customized products, marketing services and electronic
solutions. For the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and
2008, approximately 45%, 39%, and 38%, respectively, of our
total revenues were derived from our
non-United
States websites. No single country other than the United States
accounted for 10% or more of revenues in any of the years ended
June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008. For more segment and
geographic information, see our consolidated financial
statements and selected consolidated financial data included in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
including Note 11 to such consolidated financial statements.
Seasonality
Our business has become increasingly seasonal in recent years
due to increased sales of products targeted to the consumer
marketplace, such as holiday cards, calendars and personalized
gifts. Our second fiscal quarter, ending December 31,
includes the majority of the holiday shopping season and has
become our strongest quarter for sales of our consumer-oriented
products.
Government
Regulation
We are not currently subject to direct national, federal, state,
provincial or local regulation other than regulations applicable
to businesses generally or directly applicable to online
commerce. The adoption or modification of laws or regulations
relating to the Internet or other areas of our business could
limit or otherwise adversely affect the manner in which we
currently conduct our business. In addition, the growth and
development of the market for online commerce may lead to more
stringent consumer protection laws, which may impose additional
burdens on us. If we are required to comply with new regulations
or legislation or new interpretations of existing regulations or
legislation, this compliance could cause us to incur additional
expenses or alter our business model. We do not currently
provide individual personal information regarding our users to
third parties without the users permission.
Employees
As of June 30, 2010, we had approximately
2,200 full-time employees in our eleven locations worldwide
and approximately 170 temporary employees at our manufacturing
facilities. As of June 30, 2010, our largest facilities in
terms of employee count were in Canada, Jamaica, the
Netherlands, and the United States, each of which employed
approximately 300 to 600 people. None of our employees are
represented by a labor union. We are required to provide certain
employees in our Venlo facility
15
with compensation and benefits equal to or greater than those
provided in a collective bargaining agreement covering employees
in the Dutch printing trade, and employees in our Barcelona
office compensation and benefits equal to or greater than those
of the Catalonian collective bargaining agreement for office
businesses. We have not experienced any work stoppages and
believe that relations with our employees are good.
Change of
Domicile
On April 30, 2009, we announced that our Board of Directors
approved a proposal to effectively move the place of
incorporation of the publicly traded parent entity of the
Vistaprint group of companies from Bermuda to the Netherlands.
Vistaprint N.V. was formed as a limited liability company
(nammlooze vennootschap) under the laws of Netherlands on
June 5, 2009 and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vistaprint
Limited. Subsequent to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009,
at a special court-ordered meeting of common shareholders held
on August 6, 2009, the common shareholders of Vistaprint
Limited approved a scheme of arrangement under Bermuda law. On
August 31, 2009, after receipt of the approval of the
scheme of arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the
satisfaction of certain other conditions, the transactions
contemplated by the scheme of arrangement were effected.
Pursuant to the scheme of arrangement, among other things, each
common share of Vistaprint Limited outstanding immediately
before the transaction was effected was exchanged for one
outstanding ordinary share of Vistaprint N.V.
As a result of the scheme of arrangement and the share exchange
transaction, the common shareholders of Vistaprint Limited
became ordinary shareholders of Vistaprint N.V. and Vistaprint
Limited became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vistaprint N.V. In
connection with consummation of the scheme of arrangement,
Vistaprint N.V. assumed Vistaprint Limiteds existing
obligations in connection with awards granted under Vistaprint
Limiteds incentive plans and other similar employee awards.
Vistaprint N.V.s ordinary shares are registered under the
United States Securities Exchange Act and Vistaprint N.V. is
subject to the same reporting requirements under the Securities
Exchange Act to which Vistaprint Limited was previously subject.
Vistaprint N.V.s ordinary shares are listed on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the ticker symbol VPRT,
the same exchange and symbol under which the Vistaprint Limited
common shares were previously listed.
We refer to the foregoing transactions together with the steps
of the scheme of arrangement as the Change of Domicile.
Our Corporate
Information
Vistaprint N.V. was incorporated under the laws of the
Netherlands on June 5, 2009 as a wholly owned subsidiary of
Vistaprint Limited. As a result of the Change of Domicile, the
common shareholders of Vistaprint Limited became ordinary
shareholders of Vistaprint N.V. and Vistaprint N.V. became the
publicly traded parent company of the Vistaprint group of
entities. Vistaprint Limited, the immediate predecessor
corporation to Vistaprint N.V. was incorporated under the laws
of Bermuda in April 2002. Vistaprint Corporation, the immediate
predecessor to Vistaprint Limited, was incorporated in Delaware
in January 2000 and was amalgamated with Vistaprint Limited on
April 29, 2002. Vistaprint.com S.A., the predecessor to
Vistaprint Corporation, was incorporated in France in 1995 and
was merged into Vistaprint Corporation in January 2002.
We maintain our registered office in the Netherlands at
Hudsonweg 8, 5928 LW Venlo, the Netherlands. Our telephone
number in the Netherlands is +31-77-850-7700.
Available
Information
We are registered as a reporting company under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the
Exchange Act. Accordingly, we file or furnish with the
Securities
16
and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K
as required by the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations of
the SEC. We refer to these reports as Periodic Reports. The
public may read and copy any Periodic Reports or other materials
we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on
the operation of the Public Reference Room is available by
calling
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website that contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding issuers, such as Vistaprint N.V, that file
electronically with the SEC. The address of this website is
http://www.sec.gov.
We make available, free of charge through our United States
website our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such material with, or
furnish such material to, the SEC. The address of our United
States website is www.vistaprint.com. We are not
including the information contained on our website, or
information that can be accessed by links contained on our
website, as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into,
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We caution you that our actual future results may vary
materially from those contained in forward looking statements
that we make in this Report and other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases,
communications with investors and oral statements due to the
following important factors, among others. Our forward-looking
statements in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and in any other public statements we make may turn out to be
wrong. These statements can be affected by, among other things,
inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown
risks and uncertainties or risks we currently deem immaterial.
Many factors mentioned in the discussion below will be important
in determining future results. Consequently, no forward-looking
statement can be guaranteed. We undertake no obligation to
update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
Risks Related to
Our Business
If we are unable
to attract customers in a cost-effective manner, our business
and results of operations could be harmed.
Our success depends on our ability to attract customers in a
cost-effective manner. We rely on a variety of methods to draw
visitors to our websites and promote our products and services,
such as purchased search results from online search engines,
e-mail,
telesales, and direct mail. We pay providers of online services,
search engines, directories and other websites and
e-commerce
businesses to provide content, advertising banners and other
links that direct customers to our websites. We also promote our
products and special offers through
e-mail,
telesales and direct mail, targeted to repeat and potential
customers. In addition, we rely heavily upon word of mouth
customer referrals. If we are unable to develop or maintain an
effective means of reaching micro businesses and consumers, the
costs of attracting customers using these methods significantly
increase, or we are unable to develop new cost-effective means
to obtain customers, then our ability to attract new and repeat
customers would be harmed, traffic to our websites would be
reduced, and our business and results of operations would be
harmed.
Purchasers of
micro business marketing products and services, including
graphic design and customized printing, may not choose to shop
online, which would prevent us from acquiring new customers that
are necessary to the success of our business.
The online market for micro business marketing products and
services is less developed than the online market for other
business and consumer products. If this market does not gain or
maintain widespread acceptance, our business may suffer. Our
success will depend in part on our ability to
17
attract customers who have historically purchased printed
products and graphic design services through traditional
printing operations and graphic design businesses or who have
produced graphic design and printed products using self-service
alternatives. Furthermore, we may have to incur significantly
higher and more sustained advertising and promotional
expenditures or price our services and products more
competitively than we currently anticipate in order to attract
additional online consumers to our websites and convert them
into purchasing customers. Specific factors that could prevent
prospective customers from purchasing from us include:
|
|
|
|
|
concerns about buying graphic design services and marketing
products without
face-to-face
interaction with sales personnel;
|
|
|
|
the inability to physically handle and examine product samples;
|
|
|
|
delivery time associated with Internet orders;
|
|
|
|
concerns about the security of online transactions and the
privacy of personal information;
|
|
|
|
delayed shipments or shipments of incorrect or damaged
products; and
|
|
|
|
the inconvenience associated with returning or exchanging
purchased items.
|
We may not
succeed in promoting, strengthening and continuing to establish
the Vistaprint brand, which would prevent us from acquiring new
customers and increasing revenues.
Since our products and services are sold primarily through our
websites, the success of our business depends upon our ability
to attract new and repeat customers to our websites in order to
increase business and grow our revenues. For this reason, a
primary component of our business strategy is the continued
promotion and strengthening of the Vistaprint brand. In addition
to the challenges posed by establishing and promoting our brand
among the many businesses that promote products and services on
the Internet, we face significant competition from graphic
design and printing companies marketing to micro businesses who
also seek to establish strong brands. If we are unable to
successfully promote the Vistaprint brand, we may fail to
increase our revenues. Customer awareness of, and the perceived
value of, our brand will depend largely on the success of our
marketing efforts and our ability to provide a consistent,
high-quality customer experience. To promote our brand, we have
incurred and will continue to incur substantial expense related
to advertising and other marketing efforts. We may choose to
increase our branding expense materially, but we cannot be sure
that this investment will be profitable. Underperformance of
significant future branding efforts could materially damage our
financial results.
A component of our brand promotion strategy is establishing a
relationship of trust with our customers, which we believe can
be achieved by providing a high-quality customer experience. In
order to provide a high-quality customer experience, we have
invested and will continue to invest substantial amounts of
resources in our website development and technology, graphic
design operations, production operations, and customer service
operations. We also redesign our websites from time to time to
attract customers. Our ability to provide a high-quality
customer experience is also dependent, in large part, on
external factors over which we may have little or no control,
including the reliability and performance of our suppliers,
third-party carriers and communication infrastructure providers.
If we are unable to provide customers with a high-quality
customer experience for any reason, our reputation would be
harmed, and our efforts to develop Vistaprint as a trusted brand
would be adversely impacted. The failure of our brand promotion
activities could adversely affect our ability to attract new
customers and maintain customer relationships, and, as a result,
substantially harm our business and results of operations.
18
Our quarterly
financial results will often fluctuate, which may lead to
volatility in our share price.
Our revenues and operating results often vary significantly from
quarter-to-quarter
due to a number of factors, many of which are outside of our
control. Factors that could cause our quarterly revenue and
operating results to fluctuate include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
seasonality-driven or other variations in the demand for our
services and products;
|
|
|
|
currency fluctuations, which affect our revenues and our costs;
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract visitors to our websites and convert
those visitors into customers;
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain customers and encourage repeat purchases;
|
|
|
|
business and consumer preferences for our products and services;
|
|
|
|
shifts in product mix toward lower gross margin products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage our production and fulfillment operations;
|
|
|
|
costs to produce our products and to provide our services;
|
|
|
|
our pricing and marketing strategies and those of our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
improvements to the quality, cost and convenience of desktop
printing;
|
|
|
|
costs of expanding or enhancing our technology or websites;
|
|
|
|
compensation expense and charges related to our awarding of
share-based compensation;
|
|
|
|
costs and charges resulting from litigation; and
|
|
|
|
a significant increase in credits, beyond our estimated
allowances, for customers who are not satisfied with our
products.
|
In addition, management investment decisions may lead to
fluctuations in our quarterly financial results. For instance,
since we seek to deliver on annual earnings per share
objectives, and not quarterly, we may choose to make
discretionary, above planned investments that result in lower
than anticipated quarterly earnings
and/or
quarterly earnings that are lower than provided in prior
quarterly guidance.
We base our operating expense budgets in part on expected
revenue trends. A portion of our expenses, such as office leases
and personnel costs, are relatively fixed. We may be unable to
adjust spending quickly enough to offset any revenue shortfall.
Accordingly, any shortfall in revenue may cause significant
variation in operating results in any quarter. Based on the
factors cited above, among others, we believe that
quarter-to-quarter
comparisons of our operating results may not be a good
indication of our future performance. It is possible that in one
or more future quarters, our operating results may be below the
expectations of public market analysts and investors. In that
event, the price of our ordinary shares will likely fall.
Seasonal
fluctuations in our business place a strain on our operations
and resources.
Our business has become increasingly seasonal in recent years
due to increased sales of products targeted to the consumer
marketplace, such as holiday cards, calendars and personalized
gifts. Our second fiscal quarter, ending December 31,
includes the majority of the holiday shopping
19
season and has become our strongest quarter for sales of our
consumer-oriented products. In the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2010, sales during our second fiscal quarter
accounted for more of our revenue and earnings than any other
quarter, and we believe our second fiscal quarter is likely to
continue to account for a disproportionate amount of our revenue
and earnings for the foreseeable future. In anticipation of
increased sales activity during our second fiscal quarter
holiday season, we expect to incur significant additional
capacity related expenses each year to meet our seasonal needs
including facility expansions, equipment purchases and increases
in the number of temporary and permanent employees. If we
experience lower than expected sales during the second quarter,
it would likely have a disproportionately large impact on our
operating results and financial condition for the full fiscal
year. In the future, our seasonal sales patterns may become more
pronounced or may change to the extent we introduce additional
products and services targeted to the consumer marketplace,
including products and services that may be unrelated to the
second quarter holiday period. If we are unable to accurately
forecast and respond to seasonality in our business caused by
demand for our consumer-oriented products, our business and
results of operations may be materially harmed.
A significant
portion of our revenues and operations are transacted in
currencies other than the United States dollar, our reporting
currency. We therefore have currency exchange risk.
We have substantial revenues and operations transacted in
currencies other than our reporting currency. As a result, we
are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates that may
impact the translation of our revenues and expenses,
remeasurement of our intercompany balances, and the value of our
cash and cash equivalents denominated in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar. For example, when currency exchange rates
are unfavorable with respect to the U.S. dollar, the
U.S. dollar equivalent of our revenue and operating income
recorded in other currencies is diminished. As we have expanded
our international revenues and operations, our exposure to
currency exchange rate fluctuations has increased. Our revenue
and results of operations may differ materially from
expectations as a result of currency exchange rate fluctuations.
We are dependent
upon our own facilities for the production of our products, and
any significant interruption in the operations of these
facilities or any inability to increase capacity at these
facilities would have an adverse impact on our
business.
We produce the vast majority of our products internally. We seek
to ensure that we can satisfy all of our production demand from
our facilities, including at periods of peak demand, while
maintaining the level of product quality and timeliness of
delivery that customers require. We have not identified
alternatives to these facilities to serve us in the event of a
labor strike, work stoppage or other issue with our workforce in
one or more of our facilities or the loss or substantial damage
to one or more of our facilities due to fire, natural disaster
or other events. If we are unable to meet demand from our own
facilities or to successfully expand those facilities on a
timely basis to meet customer demand, we would likely turn to an
alternative supplier in an effort to supplement our production
capacity. However, an alternative supplier may not be able to
meet our production requirements on a timely basis or on
commercially acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to
fulfill orders in a timely fashion at a high level of product
quality through our facilities and are unable to find a
satisfactory supply replacement, our business and results of
operations would be substantially harmed.
Interruptions to
our website operations, information technology systems,
production processes or customer service operations for any
reason could damage our reputation and brand and substantially
harm our business and results of operations.
The satisfactory performance, reliability, security and
availability of our websites, transaction processing systems,
network infrastructure, production facilities and customer
service operations are critical to our reputation and to our
ability to attract and retain customers and to maintain adequate
customer service levels. Expanding our systems and
infrastructure may require us to commit substantial financial,
operational and technical resources before the volume of our
business increases,
20
with no assurance that our revenues will increase. Any
interruptions that cause any of our websites to be unavailable,
reduce our order fulfillment performance or interfere with
customer service operations could result in lost revenue and
negative publicity, damage our reputation and brand, and cause
our business and results of operations to suffer. A number of
factors or events could cause interruptions or interference in
our websites or operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
human error, software errors, power loss, telecommunication
failures, fire, flood, extreme weather, political instability,
acts of terrorism, war, break-ins and security breaches,
contract disputes, and other similar events. In particular, both
Bermuda, where substantially all of the computer hardware
necessary to operate our websites is located in a single
facility, and Jamaica, the location of most of our customer
service and design service operations, are subject to a high
degree of hurricane risk and extreme weather conditions.
|
|
|
|
undetected errors or design faults in our technology,
infrastructure and processes that may cause our websites to
fail. In the past, we have experienced delays in website
releases and customer dissatisfaction during the period required
to correct errors and design faults in our websites that caused
us to lose revenue. In the future, we may encounter additional
issues, such as scalability limitations, in current or future
technology releases.
|
|
|
|
our failure to maintain adequate capacity in our computer
systems to cope with the high volume of visits to our websites,
particularly during promotional campaign periods and in the
seasonal peak in demand that we experience in our second fiscal
quarter.
|
We do not presently have redundant systems operational in
multiple locations. In addition, we are dependent in part on
third parties for the implementation and maintenance of certain
aspects of our communications and production systems, and
because many of the causes of system interruptions or
interruptions of the production process may be outside of our
control, we may not be able to remedy such interruptions in a
timely manner, or at all. We do carry business interruption
insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur if
operations at our facilities are interrupted, but these policies
do not address all potential causes of business interruptions we
may experience, and any proceeds we may receive may not fully
compensate us for all of the revenue we may lose.
We face intense
competition.
The markets for small business marketing products and services
and consumer custom products, including the printing and graphic
design market, are intensely competitive, highly fragmented and
geographically dispersed, with many existing and potential
competitors. We expect competition for online small business
marketing and consumer custom products and services to increase
in the future. The increased use of the Internet for commerce
and other technical advances have allowed traditional providers
of these products and services to improve the quality of their
offerings, produce and deliver those products and services more
efficiently and reach a broader purchasing public. Competition
may result in price pressure, reduced profit margins and loss of
market share, any of which could substantially harm our business
and results of operations. Current and potential competitors
include:
|
|
|
|
|
traditional storefront printing and graphic design companies;
|
|
|
|
office superstores, drug store chains, food retailers and other
major retailers targeting small business and consumer markets,
such as Staples, UPS Stores, Office Depot, Costco, CVS,
Schleker, Walgreens, Carrefour and Wal-Mart;
|
|
|
|
wholesale printers such as Taylor Corporation and Business Cards
Tomorrow;
|
|
|
|
other online printing and graphic design companies, many of
which provide printed products and services similar to ours,
such as Overnight Prints, 123Print, Moo.com and
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
UPrinting for small business marketing products and services;
TinyPrints, Invitation Consultants and Fine Stationery for
invitations and announcements;
|
|
|
|
|
|
self-service desktop design and publishing using personal
computer software with a laser or inkjet printer and specialty
paper;
|
|
|
|
other email marketing services companies such as Constant
Contact and iContact;
|
|
|
|
other website design and hosting companies such as United
Internet, Web.com and Network Solutions;
|
|
|
|
other suppliers of custom apparel, promotional products and
customized gifts, such as Zazzle, Café Press and
Customization Mall;
|
|
|
|
online photo product companies, such as Kodak Gallery, Snapfish
by HP, Shutterfly and Photobox; and
|
|
|
|
other internet firms, such as Google (Picasa), Yahoo (Flickr),
Amazon, Facebook, MySpace, the Knot and many smaller firms.
|
Many of our current and potential competitors have advantages
over us, including longer operating histories, greater brand
recognition, existing customer and supplier relationships, and
significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources.
Many of our competitors work together. For example, Taylor
Corporation sells printed products through office superstores
such as Staples and Office Depot.
Some of our competitors that either already have an online
presence or are seeking to establish an online presence may be
able to devote substantially more resources to website and
systems development than we can. In addition, larger, more
established and better capitalized entities may acquire, invest
or partner with online competitors as use of the Internet and
other online services increases. Competitors may also seek to
develop new products, technologies or capabilities that could
render many of the products, services and content we offer
obsolete or less competitive, which could harm our business and
results of operations.
In addition, we have in the past and may in the future choose to
collaborate with certain of our existing and potential
competitors in strategic partnerships that we believe will
improve our competitive position and results of operations, such
as through a retail in-store or web-based collaborative
offering. It is possible, however, that such ventures will be
unsuccessful and that our competitive position and results of
operations will be adversely affected as a result of such
collaboration.
Our failure to
meet our customers price expectations would adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
Demand for our products and services is sensitive to price.
Changes in our pricing strategies have had, and are likely to
continue to have, a significant impact on our revenues and
results of operations. We offer certain free products and
services as a means of attracting customers, and we offer
substantial pricing discounts as a means of encouraging repeat
purchases. These free offers and discounts may not result in an
increase in our revenues or the optimization of our profits. In
addition, many factors, including our production and personnel
costs and our competitors pricing and marketing
strategies, can significantly impact our pricing strategies. If
we fail to meet our customers price expectations in any
given period, our business and results of operations will suffer.
22
We depend on
search engines to attract a substantial portion of the customers
who visit our websites, and losing these customers would
adversely affect our business and results of
operations.
Many customers access our websites by clicking through on search
results displayed by search engines such as Google, Bing and
Yahoo!. These search engines typically provide two types of
search results, algorithmic and purchased listings. Algorithmic
listings cannot be purchased, and instead are determined and
displayed solely by a set of formulas designed by the search
engine. Purchased listings can be purchased by companies and
other entities in order to attract users to their websites. We
rely on both algorithmic and purchased listings to attract and
direct a substantial portion of the customers we serve.
Search engines revise their algorithms from time to time in an
attempt to optimize their search result listings and to maximize
the advertising revenue generated by those listings. If the
search engines on which we rely for algorithmic listings modify
their algorithms, this could result in fewer customers clicking
through to our websites, requiring us to resort to other more
costly resources to replace this traffic. This could reduce our
operating and net income or our revenues, prevent us from
maintaining or increasing profitability and harm our business.
If one or more search engines on which we rely for purchased
listings modifies or terminates its relationship with us, our
expenses could rise, our revenues could decline, and our
business may suffer. The cost of purchased search listing
advertising could increase as demand for these channels
continues to grow quickly, and further increases could have
negative effects on our ability to maintain or increase
profitability. In addition, some of our competitors purchase the
term Vistaprint and other terms incorporating our
proprietary trademarks from Google and other search engines as
part of their search listing advertising. Courts do not always
side with the trademark owners in cases involving search
engines, and Google has refused to prevent companies from
purchasing the trademark Vistaprint. As a result, we
may not be able to prevent our competitors from advertising to,
and directly competing for, customers who search on the term
Vistaprint on search engines.
Various private
spam blacklisting and similar entities have in the
past, and may in the future, interfere with our
e-mail
solicitation, the operation of our websites and our ability to
conduct business.
We depend primarily on
e-mail to
market to and communicate with our customers. Various private
entities attempt to regulate the use of
e-mail for
commercial solicitation. These entities often advocate standards
of conduct or practice that significantly exceed current legal
requirements and classify certain
e-mail
solicitations that comply with current legal requirements as
unsolicited bulk
e-mails, or
spam. Some of these entities maintain
blacklists of companies and individuals, as well as
the websites, Internet service providers and Internet protocol
addresses associated with those companies and individuals, that
do not adhere to what the blacklisting entity believes are
appropriate standards of conduct or practices for commercial
e-mail
solicitations. If a companys Internet protocol addresses
are listed by a blacklisting entity,
e-mails sent
from those addresses may be blocked if they are sent to any
Internet domain or Internet address that subscribes to the
blacklisting entitys service or purchases its blacklist.
Some of our Internet protocol addresses are currently listed
with one or more blacklisting entities despite our belief that
our commercial
e-mail
solicitations comply with all applicable laws. In the future,
our other Internet protocol addresses may also be listed with
one or more blacklisting entities. We may not be successful in
convincing the blacklisting entities to remove us from their
lists. Although the blacklisting we have experienced in the past
has not had a significant impact on our ability to operate our
websites, send commercial
e-mail
solicitations, or manage or operate our corporate email
accounts, it has, from time to time, interfered with our ability
to send operational
e-mailssuch
as password reminders, invoices and electronically delivered
productsto customers and others, and to send and receive
emails to and from our corporate email accounts. In addition, as
a result of being
23
blacklisted, we have had disputes with, or concerns raised by,
various service providers who perform services for us, including
co-location and hosting services, Internet service providers and
electronic mail distribution services. We are currently on
certain blacklists and there can be no guarantee that we will
not be put on additional blacklists in the future or that we
will succeed in removing ourselves from blacklists. Blacklisting
of this type could interfere with our ability to market our
products and services, communicate with our customers and
otherwise operate our websites, and operate and manage our
corporate email accounts, all of which could have a material
negative impact on our business and results of operations.
We may not
succeed in cross selling additional products and services to our
customers.
We seek to acquire customers based on their interest in one or
more of our products and then offer additional related products
to those customers. If our customers are not interested in our
additional products or have an adverse experience with the
products they were initially interested in, the sale of
additional products and services to those customers and our
ability to increase our revenue and to improve our results of
operations could be adversely affected.
If we are unable
to retain security authentication certificates, which are
supplied by third party providers over which we exercise little
or no control, our business could be harmed.
We are dependent on a limited number of third party providers of
website security authentication certificates that may be
necessary for some of our customers web browsers to
properly access our websites and upon which many of our
customers otherwise rely in deciding whether to purchase
products and services from us. Despite any contractual
protections we may have, these third party providers can disable
or revoke, and in the past have disabled or revoked, our
security certificates without our consent, which would render
our websites inaccessible to some of our customers and could
discourage other customers from accessing our sites, unless we
are able to procure a replacement certificate from one of a
limited number of alternative third party providers. Any
interruption in our customers ability or willingness to
access our websites if our security certificates are disabled or
otherwise unavailable for an extended period of time could
result in a material loss of revenue and profits and damage to
our brand.
Our customers
create products that incorporate images, illustrations and fonts
that we license from third parties, and any loss of the right to
use these licensed materials may substantially harm our business
and results of operations.
Many of the images, illustrations, and fonts incorporated in the
design products and services we offer are the copyrighted
property of other parties that we use under license agreements.
If one or more of these licenses were terminated, the amount and
variety of content available on our websites would be
significantly reduced. In such an event, we could experience
delays in obtaining and introducing substitute materials, and
substitute materials might be available only under less
favorable terms or at a higher cost, or may not be available at
all. The termination of one or more of these licenses covering a
significant amount of content could have an adverse effect on
our business and results of operations.
If we are unable
to market and sell products and services beyond our existing
target markets and develop new products and services to attract
new customers, our results of operations may suffer.
We have developed products and services and implemented
marketing strategies designed to attract micro business owners
and consumers to our websites and encourage them to purchase our
products and services. We believe we will need to address
additional markets and attract new customers to further grow our
business. To access new markets and customers we expect that we
will need to develop, market and sell new products and services.
We also intend to continue the
24
geographic expansion of our marketing efforts and customer
service operations and the introduction of localized websites in
different countries and languages. In addition, we intend to
develop new strategic relationships to expand our marketing and
sales channels, such as co-branded or strategic partner-branded
websites and retail in-store offerings. Any failure to develop
new products and services, expand our business beyond our
existing target markets and customers, and address additional
market opportunities could harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The loss of key
personnel or an inability to attract and retain additional
personnel could affect our ability to successfully grow our
business.
We are highly dependent upon the continued service and
performance of our senior management team and key technical,
marketing and production personnel including, in particular,
Robert S. Keane, our President and Chief Executive Officer,
Wendy Cebula, our President of Vistaprint North America, Michael
Giannetto, our Chief Financial Officer and Janet Holian, our
President of Vistaprint Europe. Any of these executives may
cease their employment with us at any time with minimal advance
notice. The loss of one or more of these or other key employees
may significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our
business objectives. We face intense competition for qualified
individuals from numerous technology, marketing, financial
services, manufacturing and
e-commerce
companies. We may be unable to attract and retain suitably
qualified individuals, and our failure to do so could have an
adverse effect on our ability to implement our business plan.
If we are unable
to manage our expected growth and expand our operations
successfully, our reputation would be damaged and our business
and results of operations would be harmed.
We have rapidly grown to approximately 2,200 full-time
employees and approximately 170 temporary employees as of
June 30, 2010 and have production facilities or offices in
Australia, Bermuda, Canada, France, Germany, India, Jamaica, the
Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, Tunisia and the United States.
Our growth, combined with the geographical separation of our
operations, has placed, and will continue to place, a strain on
our management, administrative and operational infrastructure.
Our ability to manage our operations and anticipated growth will
require us to continue to refine our operational, financial and
management controls, human resource policies, reporting systems
and procedures in the locations in which we operate. We expect
the number of countries and facilities from which we operate to
continue to increase in the future.
We may not be able to implement improvements to our management
information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner
and may discover deficiencies in existing systems and controls.
If we are unable to manage expected future expansion, our
ability to provide a high-quality customer experience could be
harmed, which would damage our reputation and brand and
substantially harm our business and results of operations.
If we are unable
to manage the challenges associated with our international
operations, the growth of our business could be negatively
impacted.
We operate production facilities or offices in Australia,
Bermuda, Canada, France, Germany, India, Jamaica, the
Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, Tunisia and the United States.
We have localized websites to serve many markets
internationally. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010,
we derived 45% of our revenue from our
non-United
States websites. We are subject to a number of risks and
challenges that specifically relate to our international
operations. These risks and challenges include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty managing operations in, and communications among,
multiple locations and time zones;
|
|
|
|
local regulations that may restrict or impair our ability to
conduct our business as planned;
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
protectionist laws and business practices that favor local
producers and service providers;
|
|
|
|
interpretation of complex tax laws, treaties and regulations
that could expose us to unanticipated taxes on our income and
increase our effective tax rate;
|
|
|
|
failure to properly understand and develop graphic design
content and product formats appropriate for local tastes;
|
|
|
|
restrictions imposed by local labor practices and laws on our
business and operations; and
|
|
|
|
failure of local laws to provide a sufficient degree of
protection against infringement of our intellectual property.
|
Our international operations may not be successful if we are
unable to meet and overcome these challenges, which could limit
the growth of our business and may have an adverse effect on our
business and operating results.
Acquisitions may
be disruptive to our business.
Our business and our customer base have been built primarily
through organic growth. However, from time to time we may
selectively pursue acquisitions of businesses, technologies or
services in order to expand our capabilities, enter new markets,
or increase our market share, such as our acquisition of Soft
Sight, Inc., or Soft Sight, in December 2009. We have very
limited experience making acquisitions. Integrating any newly
acquired businesses, technologies or services may be expensive
and time consuming. To finance any acquisitions, it may be
necessary for us to raise additional funds through public or
private financings. Additional funds may not be available on
terms that are favorable to us, or at all. If we were to raise
funds through an equity financing, such a financing would result
in dilution to our shareholders. If we were to raise funds
through a debt financing, such a financing may subject us to
covenants restricting the activities we may undertake in the
future. We may be unable to operate any acquired businesses
profitably or otherwise implement our strategy successfully. If
we are unable to integrate newly acquired businesses,
technologies or services effectively, our business and results
of operations could suffer. The time and expense associated with
finding suitable and compatible businesses, technologies or
services to acquire could also disrupt our ongoing business and
divert our managements attention. Acquisitions could also
result in large and immediate write-offs or assumptions of debt
and contingent liabilities, any of which could substantially
harm our business and results of operations.
Our business and
results of operations may be negatively impacted by general
economic and financial market conditions, and such conditions
may increase the other risks that affect our business.
Despite recent signs of economic recovery in some markets, many
of the markets in which we operate are still in an economic
downturn that we believe has had and will continue to have a
negative impact on our business. Turmoil in the worlds
financial markets materially and adversely impacted the
availability of financing to a wide variety of businesses,
including micro businesses, and the resulting uncertainty led to
reductions in capital investments, marketing expenditures,
overall spending levels, future product plans, and sales
projections across industries and markets. These trends could
have a material and adverse impact on the demand for our
products and services and our financial results from operations.
The United States
government may substantially increase border controls and impose
duties or restrictions on cross-border commerce that may
substantially harm our business.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, we derived 55% of
our revenue from sales to customers made through Vistaprint.com,
our United States-focused website. We produce all physical
26
products for our United States customers at our facility in
Windsor, Ontario. Restrictions on shipping goods into the United
States from Canada pose a substantial risk to our business.
Particularly since the terrorist attacks on September 11,
2001, the United States government has substantially increased
border surveillance and controls. We have from time to time
experienced significant delays in shipping our manufactured
products into the United States as a result of these controls,
which has, in some instances, resulted in delayed delivery of
orders.
The United States also imposes protectionist measures, such as
customs duties and tariffs, that limit free trade. Some of these
measures may apply directly to product categories that comprise
a material portion of our revenues. The customs laws, rules and
regulations that we are required to comply with are complex and
subject to unpredictable enforcement and modification. If the
United States were to impose further border controls and
restrictions, interpret or apply regulations in a manner
unfavorable to the importation of products from outside of the
U.S., impose quotas, tariffs or import duties, increase the
documentation requirements applicable to cross border shipments
or take other actions that have the effect of restricting the
flow of goods from Canada and other countries to the United
States, we may have greater difficulty shipping products into
the United States or be foreclosed from doing so, experience
shipping delays, or incur increased costs and expenses, all of
which would substantially impair our ability to serve the United
States market and harm our business and results of operations.
We may not be
able to protect our intellectual property rights, which may
impede our ability to build brand identity, cause confusion
among our customers, damage our reputation and permit others to
practice our patented technology, which could substantially harm
our business and results of operations.
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, trade secret and
copyright law and contractual restrictions to protect our
intellectual property. These protective measures afford only
limited protection. Despite our efforts to protect our
proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our trademarks, our websites features and
functionalities or to obtain and use information that we
consider proprietary, such as the technology used to operate our
websites and our production operations.
As of June 30, 2010, we had 47 issued patents and more than
50 patent applications pending in the United States and other
countries. We intend to continue to pursue patent coverage in
the United States and other countries to the extent we
believe such coverage is justified, appropriate, and cost
efficient. There can be no guarantee that any of our pending
applications or continuation patent applications will be
granted. In addition, there could be infringement, invalidity,
co-inventorship or similar claims brought by third parties with
respect to any of our currently issued patents or any patents
that may be issued to us in the future. For example,
administrative opposition proceedings asking the European Patent
Office to reconsider the allowance of one of our European
patents relating to certain downloadable document design
programs and methods were filed in 2005. At a hearing held in
April 2008, an opposition panel of the European Patent Office
indicated its intention to revoke the patent at issue, and in
June 2009, the panel issued a written opinion stating the basis
for its decision. Vistaprint has appealed the decision. Any
similar claims, whether or not successful, could be extremely
costly, could damage our reputation and brand and substantially
harm our business and results of operations.
Our primary brand is Vistaprint. We hold trademark
registrations for the Vistaprint trademark in 21 jurisdictions,
including registrations in our major markets of the United
States, the European Union, Canada, Australia and Japan.
Our competitors or other entities may adopt names or marks
similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand
identity and possibly leading to customer confusion. There are
several companies that currently incorporate or may incorporate
in the future Vista into their company,
27
product or service names. There could be potential trade name or
trademark infringement claims brought by owners of other
registered trademarks or trademarks that incorporate variations
of the term Vistaprint or our other trademarks, and we may
institute such claims against other parties. Any claims or
customer confusion related to our trademarks could damage our
reputation and brand and substantially harm our business and
results of operations.
Intellectual
property disputes and litigation are costly and could cause us
to lose our exclusive rights or be subject to liability or
require us to stop some of our business activities.
From time to time, we are involved in lawsuits or disputes in
which third parties claim that we infringe their intellectual
property rights or improperly obtained or used their
confidential or proprietary information. In addition, from time
to time we receive letters from third parties that state that
these third parties have patent rights that cover aspects of the
technology that we use in our business and that the third
parties believe we are obligated to license in order to continue
to use such technology. Similarly, companies or individuals with
whom we currently have a business relationship, or have had a
past business relationship, may commence an action seeking
rights in one or more of our patents or pending patent
applications.
The cost to us of any litigation or other proceeding relating to
intellectual property rights, even if resolved in our favor,
could be substantial, and litigation diverts our
managements efforts from growing our business. Potential
adversaries may be able to sustain the costs of complex
intellectual property litigation more effectively than we can
because they have substantially greater resources. Uncertainties
resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation
could limit our ability to continue our operations. If any
parties successfully claim that our sale, use, manufacturing or
importation of technologies infringes upon their intellectual
property rights, we might be forced to pay significant damages
and attorneys fees, and a court could enjoin us from
performing the infringing activity. Thus, the situation could
arise in which our ability to use certain technologies important
to the operation of our business would be restricted by a court
order.
Alternatively, we may be required to, or decide to, enter into a
license with a third party that claims infringement by us. Any
license required under any patent may not be made available on
commercially acceptable terms, if at all. In addition, such
licenses are likely to be non-exclusive and, therefore, our
competitors may have access to the same technology licensed to
us. If we fail to obtain a required license and are unable to
design around a third partys patent, we may be unable to
effectively conduct certain of our business activities, which
could limit our ability to generate revenues or maintain
profitability and possibly prevent us from generating revenue
sufficient to sustain our operations.
In addition, we may need to resort to litigation to enforce a
patent issued to us or to determine the scope and validity of
third-party proprietary rights. Our ability to enforce our
patents, copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property
is subject to general litigation risks, as well as uncertainty
as to the enforceability of our intellectual property rights in
various countries. When we seek to enforce our rights, we may be
subject to claims that the intellectual property right is
invalid, is otherwise not enforceable, or is licensed to the
party against whom we are asserting a claim. In addition, our
assertion of intellectual property rights could result in the
other party seeking to assert alleged intellectual property
rights of its own against us, which may adversely impact our
business in the manner discussed above. Our inability to enforce
our intellectual property rights under these circumstances may
negatively impact our competitive position and our business.
You can find information about certain lawsuits that we have
filed to enforce or protect our intellectual property rights and
that have been filed against us for alleged infringement of
other parties intellectual property rights in the section
of this Report entitled, Item 3 Legal
Proceedings.
28
We sell our
products and services primarily through our websites. If we are
unable to acquire or maintain domain names for our websites,
then we could lose customers, which would substantially harm our
business and results of operations.
We sell our products and services primarily through our
websites. We currently own or control a number of Internet
domain names used in connection with our various websites,
including Vistaprint.com and similar names with alternate URL
names, such as .net, .de and .co.uk. Domain names are generally
regulated by Internet regulatory bodies. If we are unable to use
a domain name in a particular country, then we would be forced
to purchase the domain name from the entity that owns or
controls it, which we may not be able to do on commercially
acceptable terms or at all; incur significant additional
expenses to market our products within that country, including
the development of a new brand and the creation of new
promotional materials and packaging; or elect not to sell
products in that country. Any of these results could
substantially harm our business and results of operations.
Furthermore, the relationship between regulations governing
domain names and laws protecting trademarks and similar
proprietary rights is unclear and subject to change. We might
not be able to prevent third parties from acquiring domain names
that infringe or otherwise decrease the value of our trademarks
and other proprietary rights. Regulatory bodies could establish
additional top-level domains, appoint additional domain name
registrars or modify the requirements for holding domain names.
As a result, we may not be able to acquire or maintain the
domain names that utilize the name Vistaprint in all of the
countries in which we currently or intend to conduct business.
Our revenues may
be negatively affected if we are required to charge sales, value
added or other taxes on internet sales.
In many jurisdictions where we sell products and services, we do
not collect or have imposed upon us sales, value added or other
consumption taxes, which we refer to as indirect taxes. The
application of indirect taxes to ecommerce businesses such as
Vistaprint is a complex and evolving issue. Many of the
fundamental statutes and regulations that impose these taxes
were established before the growth of the Internet and
ecommerce. In many cases, it is not clear how existing statutes
apply to the Internet or ecommerce. Bills have been introduced
in the U.S. Congress that could affect the ability of state
governments to require out of state internet retailers to
collect and remit sales taxes on goods and certain services. The
imposition by national, state or local governments, whether
within or outside the United States, of various taxes upon
internet commerce could create administrative burdens for us and
could decrease our future revenue. Additionally, a successful
assertion by one or more governments in jurisdictions where we
are not currently collecting sales or value added taxes that we
should be, or should have been, collecting indirect taxes on the
sale of our products could result in substantial tax liabilities
for past sales, discourage customers from purchasing products
from us, decrease our ability to compete with traditional
retailers or otherwise negatively impact our results of
operations.
Our business is
dependent on the Internet, and unfavorable changes in government
regulation of the Internet,
e-commerce
and email marketing could substantially harm our business and
results of operations.
Due to our dependence on the Internet for our sales, regulations
and laws specifically governing the Internet,
e-commerce
and email marketing may have a greater impact on our operations
than other more traditional businesses. Existing and future laws
and regulations may impede the growth of
e-commerce
and our ability to compete with traditional graphic designers,
printers and small business marketing companies, as well as
desktop printing products. These regulations and laws may cover
taxation (as discussed above), restrictions on imports and
exports, customs, tariffs, user privacy, data protection,
commercial email, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution,
electronic contracts and other communications, consumer
protection, the provision of online payment services, broadband
residential Internet access and the characteristics and quality
of products and services. It is not clear how existing laws
governing many of these issues apply to the Internet and
e-commerce,
as the vast
29
majority of applicable laws were adopted before the advent of
the Internet and do not contemplate or address the unique issues
raised by the Internet or
e-commerce.
Those laws that do reference the Internet, such as the Bermuda
Electronic Transactions Act 1999, the U.S. Digital
Millennium Copyright Act and the U.S. CAN-SPAM Act of 2003,
are only beginning to be interpreted by the courts, and their
applicability and reach are therefore uncertain. Those current
and future laws and regulations or unfavorable resolution of
these issues may substantially harm our business and results of
operations.
If we were
required to review the content that our customers incorporate
into our products and interdict the shipment of products that
violate copyright protections or other laws, our costs would
significantly increase, which would harm our results of
operations.
Because of our focus on automation and high volumes, our
operations do not involve any human-based review of content for
the vast majority of our sales. Although our websites
terms of use specifically require customers to represent that
they have the right and authority to reproduce a given content
and that the content is in full compliance with all relevant
laws and regulations, we do not have the ability to determine
the accuracy of these representations on a
case-by-case
basis. There is a risk that a customer may supply an image or
other content that is the property of another party used without
permission, that infringes the copyright or trademark of another
party, or that would be considered to be defamatory, hateful,
racist, scandalous, obscene, or otherwise objectionable or
illegal under the laws of the jurisdiction(s) where that
customer lives or where we operate. There is, therefore, a risk
that customers may intentionally or inadvertently order and
receive products from us that are in violation of the law or the
rights of another party. If we should become legally obligated
in the future to perform manual screening and review for all
orders destined for a jurisdiction, we will encounter increased
production costs or may cease accepting orders for shipment to
that jurisdiction, which could substantially harm our business
and results of operations. In addition, if we were held liable
for actions of our customers, we could be required to pay
substantial penalties, fines or monetary damages.
We expect that
revenues we derive from third party referral programs will
decrease in the future due to our termination of membership
discount program offerings, which could adversely affect our
results of operations.
For the year ended June 30, 2010 we derived approximately
1.9% of our total revenues from referral fees generated from all
sources, as compared to 5.0% for the year ended June 30,
2009. We removed the membership discount program offerings from
our websites in November 2009 and terminated our relationship
with the third party merchant responsible for these programs. As
a result, for the year ended June 30, 2010, 0.8% of our
revenue was derived from third party membership discount
programs as compared to 3.9% in the same prior year period. In
the future, referral fees could generate more or less of our
total revenues due to a variety of factors, including, among
others, new product and service offering decisions or
customers acceptance of our partner offers. We expect to
partially offset any anticipated reductions in referral fee
revenues from a variety of sources, but if we are not successful
in doing so our revenues and profitability could be adversely
affected.
Purported Federal
class action lawsuits have been filed alleging that certain of
our customers were, without their knowledge or consent, enrolled
in and billed for membership discount programs previously
offered by third party merchants on our Vistaprint.com website.
If we or the third party merchants are unable to successfully
resolve these lawsuits or similar claims that may be brought in
the future, our reputation, revenues and results of operations
could be adversely affected.
During each of the last three fiscal years, we generated a small
portion of our revenue from order referral fees, revenue share
and other fees paid to us by third party merchants for customer
click-throughs, distribution of third party promotional
materials, and referrals arising from products and services of
the third party merchants we offer to our customers on our
website, which we collectively
30
refer to as referral fees. Some of these third party
referral-based offers were for memberships in discount programs
or similar promotions made to customers who have purchased
products from us, in which we received a payment from a third
party merchant for every customer that accepted the promotion.
Some of these third party membership discount programs have
been, and may continue to be, the subject of consumer
complaints, litigation, and governmental regulatory actions
alleging that the enrollment and billing practices involved in
the programs violate various consumer protection laws or are
otherwise deceptive. For example, various state attorneys
general have brought consumer fraud lawsuits against certain of
the third party merchants asserting that they have not
adequately disclosed the terms of their offers and have not
obtained proper approval from consumers before debiting the
consumers bank account or billing the consumers
credit card. Similarly, in May 2009, Senator John D. Rockefeller
IV, Chairman of the United States Senate Committee on Commerce,
Science and Transportation, announced that the Commerce
Committee was investigating membership discount programs
marketed by third party merchants Vertrue, Inc., Webloyalty.com,
Inc. and Affinion Group, Inc. through
e-commerce
retailers, and in June 2010 the Commerce Committee approved
proposed legislation that seeks to regulate certain aspects of
the membership programs. From time to time we have received
complaints from our customers and inquiries by state attorneys
general and government agencies regarding the membership
discount programs previously offered on our websites. Although
we removed all such membership discount program offerings from
our websites as of November 2009 and terminated our relationship
with the third party merchant responsible for these programs, we
have continued to receive complaints and inquiries about these
programs.
In addition, we are currently involved in several purported
class action lawsuits that were filed against us and two
affiliated third party merchants, which lawsuits have been
consolidated into one suit, alleging that we and the merchants
violated certain Federal and state consumer protection laws in
connection with the offer of membership discount programs on our
Vistaprint.com website. You can find more information about this
lawsuit in the section of this Report entitled,
Item 3 Legal Proceedings. We and
the third party merchants may receive other complaints in the
future regarding these types of membership discount programs.
The purported class action lawsuits or any other private or
governmental claims or actions that may be brought against us in
the future relating to these third party membership programs
could result in our being obligated to pay substantial damages
or incurring substantial legal fees in defending claims. These
damages and fees could be disproportionate to the revenues we
generated through these relationships, which would have an
adverse affect on our results of operations. Even if we are
successful in defending against these claims, such a defense may
result in distraction of management and significant costs. In
addition, customer dissatisfaction or damage to our reputation
as a result of these claims could have a negative impact on our
brand, revenues and profitability.
Our practice of
offering free products and services could be subject to judicial
or regulatory challenge, which, if successful, would hinder our
ability to attract customers and generate revenue.
We regularly offer free products and services as an inducement
for customers to try our products and services. Although we
believe that we conspicuously and clearly communicate all
details and conditions of these offersfor example, that
customers are required to pay shipping and processing charges to
take advantage of a free product offerwe have in the past,
and may in the future, be subject to claims by individuals or
governmental regulators in Europe, the United States and other
countries that our free offers are misleading or do not comply
with applicable legislation or regulation. In addition,
customers and competitors have filed complaints with
governmental and standards bodies claiming that customers were
misled by the terms of our free offers. If our free product
offers are subject to further challenges or actions in the
future, or if we are compelled or determine to curtail or
eliminate our use of free offers as the result of any such
actions, our business prospects and results of operations could
be materially harmed.
31
Our failure to
protect our network and the confidential information of our
customers against security breaches and to address risks
associated with credit card fraud could damage our reputation
and brand and substantially harm our business and results of
operations.
A significant prerequisite to online commerce and communications
is the secure transmission of confidential information over
public networks. Our failure to prevent security breaches of our
network could damage our reputation and brand and substantially
harm our business and results of operations. Currently, a
majority of our sales are billed to our customers credit
card accounts directly. We retain the credit card information of
all of our customers for a limited period of time for the
purpose of issuing refunds and of our subscription customers for
a longer period of time for the purpose of recurring billing. We
rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from
third parties to effect secure transmission of confidential
information, including credit card numbers. Advances in computer
capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or
other related developments, among other factors, may result in a
compromise or breach of our network or the technology that we
use to protect our network and our customer transaction data
including credit card information. Any such compromise of our
network or our security could damage our reputation and brand
and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible
liability, which would substantially harm our business and
results of operations. In addition, anyone who is able to
circumvent our security measures could misappropriate
proprietary information or cause interruptions in our
operations. We may need to expend significant resources to
protect against security breaches or to address problems caused
by breaches.
In addition, under current credit card practices, we may be
liable for fraudulent credit card transactions conducted on our
websites, such as through the use of stolen credit card numbers,
because we do not obtain a cardholders signature. To date,
quarterly losses from credit card fraud have not exceeded 1% of
total revenues in any quarter, but we continue to face the risk
of significant losses from this type of fraud. Although we seek
to maintain insurance to cover us against this risk, we cannot
be certain that our coverage will be adequate to cover
liabilities actually incurred as a result of such fraud or that
insurance will continue to be available to us on economically
reasonable terms, or at all. Our failure to limit fraudulent
credit card transactions could damage our reputation and brand
and substantially harm our business and results of operations.
We are subject to
customer payment-related risks.
We accept payments for our products and services on our websites
by a variety of methods, including credit card, debit card and
bank check. In most geographic regions, we rely on one or two
third party companies to provide payment processing services,
including the processing of credit cards, debit cards and
electronic checks. If either of these companies became unwilling
or unable to provide these services to us, then we would need to
find and engage replacement providers, which we may not be able
to do on terms that are acceptable to us or at all, or to
process the payments ourselves, which could be costly and time
consuming, either of which scenarios could disrupt our business.
As we offer new payment options to our customers, we may be
subject to additional regulations, compliance requirements and
fraud risk. For certain payment methods, including credit and
debit cards, we pay interchange and other fees, which may
increase over time and raise our operating costs and lower our
profit margins or require that we charge our customers more for
our products. We are also subject to payment card association
and similar operating rules and requirements, which could change
or be reinterpreted to make it difficult or impossible for us to
comply. If we fail to comply with these rules and requirements,
we may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees and lose
our ability to accept credit and debit card payments from our
customers or facilitate other types of online payments, and our
business and operating results could be materially adversely
affected.
32
We may be subject
to product liability claims if people or property are harmed by
the products we sell.
Some of the products we sell may expose us to product liability
claims relating to personal injury, death, or property damage,
and may require product recalls or other actions. Although we
maintain product liability insurance, we cannot be certain that
our coverage will be adequate for liabilities actually incurred
or that insurance will continue to be available to us on
reasonable terms, or at all.
Risks Related to
Our Corporate Structure
Challenges by
various tax authorities to our complex international structure
could, if successful, increase our effective tax rate and
adversely affect our earnings.
We are a Dutch limited liability company that operates through
various subsidiaries in a number of countries throughout the
world. Consequently, we are subject to tax laws, treaties and
regulations in the countries in which we operate. Our income
taxes are based upon the applicable tax laws and tax rates in
the countries in which we operate and earn income as well as
upon our operating structures in these countries. Many
countries tax laws and international treaties impose
taxation upon entities that conduct a trade or business or
operate through a permanent establishment in those countries.
However, these applicable laws or treaties are subject to
interpretation. The tax authorities in these countries could
contend that a greater portion of the income of the Vistaprint
N.V. group should be subject to income or other tax in their
respective jurisdictions. This could result in an increase to
our effective tax rate and adversely affect our results of
operations.
A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or their
interpretation, of any country in which we operate could result
in a higher tax rate on our earnings, which could result in a
significant negative impact on our earnings and cash flow from
operations. We continue to assess the impact of various
international tax proposals and modifications to existing tax
treaties between the Netherlands and other countries that could
result in a material impact on our income taxes. We cannot
predict whether any specific legislation will be enacted or the
terms of any such legislation. However, if such proposals were
enacted, or if modifications were to be made to certain existing
treaties, the consequences could have a materially adverse
impact on us, including increasing our tax burden, increasing
costs of our tax compliance or otherwise adversely affecting our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our intercompany
arrangements may be challenged, resulting in higher taxes or
penalties and an adverse effect on our earnings.
We operate pursuant to written intercompany service and related
agreements, which we also refer to as transfer pricing
agreements, among Vistaprint N.V. and its subsidiaries. These
agreements establish transfer prices for production, marketing,
management, technology development and other services performed
by these subsidiaries for other group companies. Transfer prices
are prices that one company in a group of related companies
charges to another member of the group for goods, services or
the use of property. If two or more affiliated companies are
located in different countries, the tax laws or regulations of
each country generally will require that transfer prices be
consistent with those between unrelated companies dealing at
arms length. With the exception of the transfer pricing
arrangements applicable to our Dutch and French operations, our
transfer pricing arrangements are not binding on applicable tax
authorities and no official authority in any other country has
made a determination as to whether or not we are operating in
compliance with its transfer pricing laws. If tax authorities in
any country were to successfully challenge our transfer prices
as not reflecting arms length transactions, they could
require us to adjust our transfer prices and thereby reallocate
our income to reflect these revised transfer prices. A
reallocation of taxable income from a lower tax jurisdiction to
a higher tax jurisdiction would result in a higher tax liability
to us. In addition, if the
33
country from which the income is reallocated does not agree with
the reallocation, both countries could tax the same income,
resulting in double taxation.
We will pay taxes
even if we are not profitable on a consolidated basis, which
would cause increased losses and further harm to our results of
operations.
The intercompany service and related agreements among Vistaprint
N.V. and our direct and indirect subsidiaries in general
guarantee that the subsidiaries realize profits. As a result,
even if the Vistaprint group is not profitable on a consolidated
basis, the majority of our subsidiaries will be profitable and
incur income taxes in their respective jurisdictions. If we are
unprofitable on a consolidated basis, as has been the case in
some prior periods, this structure will increase our
consolidated losses and further harm our results of operations.
Provisions of our
Articles of Association, the Articles of Association of the
independent foundation, Stichting Continuïteit
Vistaprint, Dutch law and the call option we granted to the
independent foundation may make it difficult to replace or
remove management and may inhibit or delay a change of control,
including a takeover attempt that might result in a premium over
the market price for our ordinary shares, and dilute your voting
power.
Our Articles of Association, or Articles, limit our
shareholders ability to suspend or dismiss the members of
our management board and supervisory board or to overrule our
supervisory boards nominees to our management board and
supervisory board by requiring a vote of two-thirds of the votes
cast representing more than 50% of the outstanding ordinary
shares to do so under most circumstances. As a result, there may
be circumstances in which shareholders may not be able to remove
members of our management board or supervisory board even if
holders of a majority of our ordinary shares favor doing so.
Our Articles also allow us to issue preferred shares. We have
established an independent foundation, Stichting
Continuïteit Vistaprint, or the Foundation, and
granted the Foundation a call option pursuant to which the
Foundation may acquire a number of preferred shares equal to the
same number of ordinary shares then outstanding. The objective
of the Foundation is to serve the interests of Vistaprint N.V.
and its stakeholders, which includes but is not limited to
shareholders. In carrying out this objective, the Foundation may
acquire, own and vote our preferred shares in order to maintain
the independence, continuity or identity of Vistaprint N.V. If
the Foundation were to exercise the call option, it may prevent
a change of control or delay or prevent a takeover attempt,
including a takeover attempt that might result in a premium over
the market price for our ordinary shares. Exercise of the
preferred share option would also effectively dilute the voting
power of our outstanding ordinary shares by one-half.
In addition, our management board may issue preferred shares up
to an amount equal to the number of ordinary shares under our
authorized share capital. We must seek authorization from our
shareholders at least once every five years for our management
board to issue preferred shares.
We have limited
flexibility with respect to certain aspects of capital
management.
Dutch law requires shareholder approval for the issuance of
ordinary shares and for our management board to limit or exclude
shareholders preemptive rights under Dutch law. In August
2009, our shareholders granted our supervisory board and
management board the authority to issue ordinary shares as the
boards determine appropriate without obtaining specific
shareholder approval for each issuance, but this authorization
is limited to the number of ordinary shares under our authorized
share capital and expires in August 2014. We intend to seek
re-approval from our shareholders before the 2014 expiration
date. Additionally, subject to specified exceptions, Dutch law
grants preemptive rights to existing shareholders to subscribe
for new issuances of shares and reserves for approval by
shareholders many corporate actions, such as the approval of
dividends.
34
Situations may arise where the flexibility to issue shares, pay
dividends or take other corporate actions without a shareholder
vote would be beneficial to us, but is not available under Dutch
law.
Because of our
Articles of Association and our organization under Dutch law,
you may find it difficult to pursue legal remedies against the
members of our supervisory board or management board.
Our Articles and our internal corporate affairs are governed by
Dutch law. The rights of our shareholders and the
responsibilities of the supervisory board and management board
that direct our affairs are different from those established
under United States laws. For example, class action lawsuits and
derivative lawsuits are generally not available under Dutch law.
You may find it more difficult to protect your interests against
actions by members of our supervisory board or management board
than you would if we were a U.S. corporation. Under Dutch
law, the supervisory board and the management board are
responsible for acting in the best interests of the company, its
business and all of its stakeholders generally, which includes
employees, customers and creditors, not just shareholders.
Furthermore, under our Articles, we are obligated to indemnify
the members of our supervisory board and our management board
against liabilities resulting from proceedings against such
members in connection with their membership on either board, if
such member acted in good faith and in a manner he believed to
be in our best interests and such member has not been adjudged
in a final and non-appealable judgment by a Dutch judge to be
liable for gross negligence or willful misconduct, subject to
various exceptions.
We are
incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands, and the vast
majority of our assets are located outside the United States,
which may make it difficult for shareholders to enforce civil
liability provisions of the federal or state securities laws of
the United States.
We are incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands, and the
vast majority of our assets are located outside of the United
States. In addition, certain members of our management board and
some of our officers reside outside the United States. As a
result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of
process within the United States upon us or such other persons,
to enforce outside the U.S. judgments obtained against such
persons in U.S. courts, or to enforce rights predicated
upon the U.S. securities laws. There is no treaty between
the United States and the Netherlands for the mutual recognition
and enforcement of judgments (other than arbitration awards) in
civil and commercial matters. Therefore, a final judgment for
the payment of money rendered by any federal or state court in
the United States based on civil liability, whether or not
predicated solely upon the federal securities laws, would not be
directly enforceable in the Netherlands; the party in whose
favor such final judgment is rendered would need to bring a new
suit in a competent court in the Netherlands and petition the
Dutch court to enforce the final judgment rendered in the United
States. Therefore, there can be no assurance that
U.S. shareholders will be able to enforce against us,
members of our management board or supervisory board or officers
who are residents of the Netherlands or countries other than the
United States any judgments obtained in U.S. courts in
civil and commercial matters, including judgments under the
federal securities laws. In addition, it is possible that a
Dutch court would not impose civil liability on us, the members
of our management board or supervisory board or our officers in
an original action predicated solely upon the federal securities
laws of the United States brought in a court of competent
jurisdiction in the Netherlands against us or such members or
officers.
We may not be
able to make distributions or repurchase shares without
subjecting our shareholders to Dutch withholding tax.
A Dutch withholding tax may be levied on dividends and similar
distributions made by Vistaprint N.V. to its shareholders at the
statutory rate of 15% if we cannot structure such distributions
as being made to shareholders in relation to a reduction of par
value, which would be non-taxable for Dutch withholding tax
purposes. We have in the past, and may in the future, repurchase
outstanding
35
ordinary shares. Under our Dutch Advanced Tax Ruling, a
repurchase of shares should not result in any Dutch withholding
tax if we hold the repurchased shares in treasury for the
purpose of issuing shares upon the exercise of certain stock
awards and other potential uses. However, if the shares cannot
be used for these purposes, or the Dutch tax authorities
challenge the use of the shares for these purposes, such a
repurchase of shares for the purposes of capital reduction may
be treated as a partial liquidation subject to the 15% Dutch
withholding tax to be levied on the difference between our
recognized paid in capital for Dutch tax purposes and the
redemption price.
We may be treated as a passive foreign investment company for
United States tax purposes, which may subject United States
shareholders to adverse tax consequences.
If our passive income, or our assets that produce passive
income, exceed levels provided by law for any taxable year, we
may be characterized as a passive foreign investment company, or
a PFIC, for United States federal income tax purposes. If we are
treated as a PFIC, U.S. holders of our ordinary shares
would be subject to a disadvantageous United States federal
income tax regime with respect to the distributions they receive
and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other
disposition of their ordinary shares.
We believe that we were not a PFIC for the tax year ended
June 30, 2010 and we expect that we will not become a PFIC
in the foreseeable future. However, whether we are treated as a
PFIC depends on questions of fact as to our assets and revenues
that can only be determined at the end of each tax year.
Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will not be treated as
a PFIC for our current tax year or for any subsequent year.
If a United
States shareholder acquires 10% or more of our ordinary shares,
it may be subject to increased United States taxation under the
controlled foreign corporation rules.
Each 10% U.S. Shareholder of a
non-U.S. corporation
that is a controlled foreign corporation, or CFC,
for an uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during a
taxable year, and that owns shares in the CFC directly or
indirectly through
non-U.S. entities
on the last day of the CFCs taxable year, must include in
its gross income for United States federal income tax purposes
its pro rata share of the CFCs subpart F
income, even if the subpart F income is not distributed. A
non-U.S. corporation
is considered a CFC if one or more 10% U.S. Shareholders
together own more than 50% of the total combined voting power of
all classes of voting shares of the
non-U.S. corporation
or more than 50% of the total value of all shares of the
corporation on any day during the taxable year of the
corporation. The rules defining ownership for these purposes are
complicated and depend on the particular facts relating to each
investor. For taxable years in which we are a CFC for an
uninterrupted period of 30 days or more, each of our 10%
U.S. Shareholders will be required to include in its gross
income for United States federal income tax purposes its pro
rata share of our subpart F income, even if the subpart F income
is not distributed to enable such taxpayer to satisfy this tax
liability. Based upon our existing share ownership, we do not
believe we are a CFC. However, whether we are treated as a CFC
depends on questions of fact as to our share ownership that can
only be determined at the end of each tax year. Accordingly, we
cannot be certain that we will not be treated as a CFC for our
current tax year or for any subsequent year.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
We own real property associated with the three computer
integrated manufacturing facilities we have constructed for the
production of our products. Our 512,000 square foot
facility located near Windsor, Ontario, Canada services the
North American market, and our 195,800 square foot facility
located in Venlo, the Netherlands services markets outside of
North America. In June 2010, we
36
commenced production in our 124,000 square foot facility
located in Deer Park, Australia that will primarily service the
Asia-Pacific markets. Our web servers are located in data center
space at a Cable & Wireless co-location and hosting
facility in Devonshire, Bermuda. We own an 11 acre site in
Montego Bay, Jamaica on which a new 92,000 square foot
building is expected to be constructed for a customer service,
sales and design support center which will replace the leased
spaces in Jamaica noted below.
In addition we lease the properties listed below as of
June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
Type
|
|
Lease Expires
|
|
Lexington, MA, USA
|
|
|
202,000
|
|
|
Technology development,
marketing and administrative
|
|
|
April 26, 2017
|
|
Montego Bay, Jamaica
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
Customer service, sales and design support center
|
|
|
April 30, 2011
|
|
Barcelona, Spain
|
|
|
37,100
|
|
|
Marketing and administrative
|
|
|
November 30, 2011
|
|
Berlin, Germany
|
|
|
15,070
|
|
|
Customer service, sales and design support center
|
|
|
October 31, 2014
|
|
Tunis, Tunisia
|
|
|
13,900
|
|
|
Customer service, sales and design support center
|
|
|
August 31, 2010
|
|
Winterthur, Switzerland
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
Technology development and prototyping laboratory
|
|
|
February 28, 2013
|
|
Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
Marketing and administrative
|
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
Paris, France
|
|
|
3,850
|
|
|
Headquarters office, including CEO and strategy
|
|
|
May 31, 2018
|
|
Vadodara, India
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
Technology development
|
|
|
March 20, 2014
|
|
We believe that the total space available to us in the
facilities we own and under our current leases and co-location
arrangements or obtainable by us on commercially reasonable
terms, will meet our needs for the foreseeable future.
On July 27, 2006, Vistaprint Technologies Limited, an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Vistaprint N.V., filed a
patent infringement lawsuit against print24 GmbH,
unitedprint.com AG and their two managing directors in the
District Court in Düsseldorf Germany, alleging infringement
by the defendants in Germany of one of Vistaprint Technologies
Limiteds European patents related to computer-implemented
methods and apparatus for generating pre-press graphic files. On
June 7, 2007, unitedprint.com AG filed a patent
nullification action in the German Patent Court in relation to
the same European patent at issue in Vistaprint Technologies
Limiteds infringement lawsuit against print24 and its
co-defendants. On July 31, 2007, the District Court in
Düsseldorf ruled in Vistaprint Technologies Limiteds
favor on the underlying infringement claim against print24 and
its co-defendants, granting all elements of the requested
injunction and ordering the defendants to pay damages for past
infringement. The Düsseldorf District Courts ruling
went into effect in early September 2007 and was not appealed by
the defendants. On November 13, 2008, the German Patent
Court held an oral hearing on the patent nullification action
brought by unitedprint.com and revoked the patent at issue. The
Patent Court issued a written opinion stating the basis for its
ruling on March 24, 2009, and on April 22, 2009,
Vistaprint Technologies Limited filed a notice of appeal of the
Patent Courts ruling with the German Federal Supreme
Court. We are unable to express an opinion as to the likely
outcome of such appeal.
On May 14, 2007, Vistaprint Technologies Limited filed a
patent infringement lawsuit against 123Print, Inc. and Drawing
Board (US), Inc., subsidiaries of Taylor Corporation, in the
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The
complaint in the lawsuit asserts that the defendants have
infringed and continue to infringe three U.S. patents owned
by Vistaprint Technologies Limited related to browser-based
tools for online product design. The complaint seeks an
injunction against
37
the defendants and the recovery of damages. The defendants filed
their Answer and Counterclaims to the complaint on June 7,
2007, in which they denied the infringement allegations and
asserted counterclaims for declaratory judgment of invalidity,
unenforceability and non-infringement of the
patents-in-suit.
In August 2007, another Taylor Corporation subsidiary, Taylor
Strategic Accounts, Inc., was added as an additional defendant
in the case. The exchange of relevant documents and records and
the depositions of fact witnesses in connection with the
allegations of the parties have been substantially completed. In
early June 2008, newly discovered third party prior art
documents were introduced into the litigation. These documents
had not been reviewed and considered by the U.S. Patent
Office prior to issuance of the
patents-in-suit.
For that reason, on June 30, 2008, Vistaprint Technologies
Limited requested the United States District Court to stay the
litigation to provide the U.S. Patent Office an opportunity
to reexamine the
patents-in-suit
in light of these newly discovered documents, and the Court
granted Vistaprint Technologies Limiteds request for a
stay on September 2, 2008. Vistaprint Technologies Limited
then submitted a request for reexamination of each of the
patents-in-suit
to the U.S. Patent Office, which granted the reexamination
requests in February 2009. Pursuant to the Courts order,
the stay will remain in place pending the resolution of the
requests for reexamination. On October 28, 2008, a St.
Paul, Minnesota law firm representing Taylor Corporation also
filed requests with the U.S. Patent Office seeking
reexamination of the three
patents-in-suit.
These reexamination requests were granted in May and June 2009
and were merged in September 2009 with the reexaminations
earlier filed by Vistaprint Technologies Limited. We are unable
to express an opinion as to the likely outcome of any such
reexamination or of the underlying lawsuit.
On July 29, 2008, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Texas (the Texas Complaint) against
Vistaprint Corp., Vistaprint USA, Inc., Vertrue, Inc. and
Adaptive Marketing, LLC (collectively, the
Defendants). Adaptive Marketing, LLC is a Vertrue,
Inc. company that provides subscription-based membership
discount programs, including programs that are offered on our
Vistaprint.com website (Vertrue, Inc. and Adaptive Marketing,
LLC are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the
Vertrue Defendants). The Texas Complaint alleges
that the Defendants violated, among other statutes, the
Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer
Protection Act and the Texas Theft Liability Act, in connection
with certain membership discount programs offered to our
customers on our Vistaprint.com website. The Texas Complaint
also seeks recovery for unjust enrichment, conversion, and
similar common law claims. Subsequent to the filing of the Texas
complaint, in July, August and September 2008, several nearly
identical purported class action lawsuits were filed in the
United States District Court, District of New Jersey, the United
States District Court, Southern District of Alabama, the United
States District Court, District of Nevada, the United States
District Court, District of Massachusetts, and the United States
District Court, District of Florida against the same Defendants,
and in one case Vistaprint Limited, on behalf of different
plaintiffs. The complaints in each of these nearly identical
lawsuits include substantially the same purported Federal and
common law claims as the Texas Complaint but contain different
state law claims. In addition, on August 28, 2008, a
purported class action lawsuit asserting substantially the same
Federal and common law claims as the Texas Complaint, but
containing a state law claim under the Massachusetts Unfair
Trade Practices Act, was filed by a different plaintiff in the
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, against
Vistaprint Limited, Vistaprint USA, Inc. and the Vertrue
Defendants.
Among other allegations, the plaintiffs in each action claim
that after ordering products on our Vistaprint.com website they
were enrolled in certain membership discount programs operated
by the Vertrue Defendants and that monthly subscription fees for
the programs were subsequently charged directly to the credit or
debit cards they used to make purchases on Vistaprint.com, in
each case purportedly without their knowledge or authorization.
The plaintiffs also claim that the Defendants failed to disclose
to them that the credit or debit card information they provided
to make purchases on Vistaprint.com would be disclosed to the
Vertrue Defendants and would be used to pay for monthly
38
subscriptions for the membership discount programs. The
plaintiffs have requested that the Defendants be enjoined from
engaging in the practices complained of by the plaintiffs. They
also are seeking an unspecified amount of damages, including
statutory and punitive damages, as well as pre-judgment and
post-judgment interest and attorneys fees and costs for
the purported class.
In response to opposing motions filed by the plaintiffs and the
Defendants, on December 11, 2008, the Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation ordered the transfer of all of the
outstanding cases to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas for coordinated pretrial proceedings.
As a result of the ruling of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, on March 2, 2009 four of the existing
plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Complaint with the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
On August 31, 2009, the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Texas dismissed all of the claims
against the Defendants and ruled on substantive grounds that the
Defendants had not violated any of the statutes or common law
claims cited by the plaintiffs. In September 2009, the
plaintiffs filed an appeal with the U.S. Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals, and on August 23, 2010, the Court of
Appeals affirmed the District Courts ruling and dismissal.
On June 26, 2009, Vistaprint Limited, our wholly owned
subsidiary, and Vistaprint USA, Incorporated, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Vistaprint Limited, together with sixteen other
companies unaffiliated with Vistaprint Limited or Vistaprint
USA, Incorporated, were named as defendants in a complaint for
patent infringement by Soverain Software LLC in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The
complaint alleges that the named defendants are infringing
U.S. Patents 5,715,314, 5,909,492 and 7,272,639. Two of the
asserted patents relate generally to network-based sales systems
employing a customer computer, a shopping cart computer and a
shopping cart database. The third patent relates generally to
the use of session identifiers in connection with requests
transmitted through a network between a client and a server. The
plaintiff is seeking declarations that the patents at issue are
valid and enforceable and that the defendants infringe the
patents, as well as the entry of a preliminary and permanent
injunction and damages. We are unable to express an opinion as
to its likely outcome.
On July 21, 2009, Vistaprint Limited and OfficeMax
Incorporated were named as defendants in a complaint for patent
infringement filed by ColorQuick LLC in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint
alleges that Vistaprint Limited and OfficeMax Incorporated are
infringing U.S. patent 6,839,149, relating generally to
systems and methods for processing electronic files stored in a
page description language format, such as PDF. The plaintiff is
seeking a declaration that the patent at issue is valid and
enforceable, a declaration that Vistaprint Limited infringes,
the entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction, and
damages. We are unable to express an opinion as to its likely
outcome.
We are not currently party to any other material legal
proceedings. We are involved, from time to time, in various
legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business
activities. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot
be predicted with certainty, we do not expect resolution of
these matters to have a material adverse impact on our
consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial
position. However, an unfavorable resolution of such a
proceeding could, depending on its amount and timing, materially
affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial
position in a future period. Regardless of the outcome,
litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense
costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.
39
|
|
Item 4.
|
Removed
and Reserved
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
The ordinary shares of Vistaprint N.V. are traded on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol VPRT. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high
and low sale price per share of our ordinary shares on The
NASDAQ Global Select Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
38.56
|
|
|
$
|
24.46
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
34.42
|
|
|
$
|
11.75
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
29.00
|
|
|
$
|
15.25
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
44.75
|
|
|
$
|
27.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
52.47
|
|
|
$
|
38.88
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
59.92
|
|
|
$
|
46.76
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
62.77
|
|
|
$
|
50.58
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
61.85
|
|
|
$
|
42.65
|
|
Holders
As of August 20, 2010, there were 15 holders of record
of our ordinary shares.
Dividends
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our
ordinary shares, and we do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to
retain all future earnings for use in the operation of our
business or for the repurchase of our shares.
Use of
Proceeds
The registration statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-125470)
for the initial public offering of Vistaprint Limited common
shares, par value $0.01 per share, was declared effective by the
SEC on September 29, 2005. We received net proceeds of
approximately $61.4 million (after underwriters
discounts of $4.6 million). We incurred additional, related
expenses of approximately $1.6 million, resulting in
proceeds, after expenses, to us of approximately
$59.8 million. As of August 27, 2010, we had not
utilized any of the net proceeds from the offering.
40
Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
We acquired ordinary shares in satisfaction of employee tax
withholding requirements in connection with the vesting of
restricted shares. The table below shows all repurchases of
securities by us during the three months ended June 30,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of
|
|
|
of shares that may
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares purchased as
|
|
|
yet be purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
part of publicly
|
|
|
under publicly
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares
|
|
|
Average price paid per
|
|
|
announced plans or
|
|
|
announced plans
|
|
|
|
purchased (1)
|
|
|
share
|
|
|
programs
|
|
|
or programs
|
|
|
April 1, 2010 to April 30, 2010
|
|
|
5,434
|
|
|
$
|
59.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2010 to May 31, 2010
|
|
|
28,068
|
|
|
|
49.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
47.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
35,722
|
|
|
$
|
51.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The ordinary shares reflected in this column were withheld
directly from issuance of ordinary shares to employees pursuant
to vested restricted share units. |
Information regarding our equity compensation plans and the
securities authorized for issuance there under are set forth
herein under Part III, Item 12, Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters, below.
41
Performance
Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total return to
shareholders on Vistaprint N.V. ordinary shares relative to the
cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite index and the
RDG Internet Composite index. An investment of $100 (with
reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in
our ordinary shares and in each of the indexes on
September 30, 2005 and its relative performance is tracked
through June 30, 2010.
COMPARISON OF
57 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among
Vistaprint N.V., the NASDAQ Composite Index
and the RDG Internet Composite Index
*$100 invested on 9/30/05 in stock
or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending June 30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/30/05
|
|
|
6/30/06
|
|
|
6/30/07
|
|
|
6/30/08
|
|
|
6/30/09
|
|
|
6/30/10
|
|
|
Vistaprint N.V.
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
175.34
|
|
|
$
|
250.82
|
|
|
$
|
175.48
|
|
|
$
|
279.67
|
|
|
$
|
311.41
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
101.73
|
|
|
|
124.45
|
|
|
|
108.32
|
|
|
|
86.25
|
|
|
|
100.27
|
|
RDG Internet Composite
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
98.70
|
|
|
|
130.61
|
|
|
|
125.49
|
|
|
|
106.45
|
|
|
|
123.62
|
|
The stock price performance included in this graph is not
necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data
|
The following selected consolidated financial data should be
read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements,
the related notes and Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The selected consolidated financial data set forth below as of
June 30, 2010 and 2009, and for the years ended
June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are derived from our audited
financial statements and included elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The selected consolidated
42
financial data as of June 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for
the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are derived from our
audited financial statements not included in this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
See the notes to the consolidated financial statements for an
explanation of the method used to determine the number of shares
used in computing basic and diluted net income per ordinary
share. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
670,035
|
|
|
$
|
515,826
|
|
|
$
|
400,657
|
|
|
$
|
255,933
|
|
|
$
|
152,149
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
240,195
|
|
|
|
191,944
|
|
|
|
154,122
|
|
|
|
89,971
|
|
|
|
49,858
|
|
Technology and development expense
|
|
|
78,387
|
|
|
|
60,921
|
|
|
|
44,828
|
|
|
|
27,176
|
|
|
|
15,628
|
|
Marketing and selling expense
|
|
|
216,574
|
|
|
|
159,143
|
|
|
|
127,975
|
|
|
|
87,887
|
|
|
|
51,174
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
58,031
|
|
|
|
42,236
|
|
|
|
32,572
|
|
|
|
23,694
|
|
|
|
16,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
76,848
|
|
|
|
61,582
|
|
|
|
41,160
|
|
|
|
27,205
|
|
|
|
18,865
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
4,691
|
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1,491)
|
|
|
|
(803)
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
75,014
|
|
|
|
61,103
|
|
|
|
44,092
|
|
|
|
30,023
|
|
|
|
20,018
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
7,273
|
|
|
|
5,417
|
|
|
|
4,261
|
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
67,741
|
|
|
$
|
55,686
|
|
|
$
|
39,831
|
|
|
$
|
27,143
|
|
|
$
|
19,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
67,741
|
|
|
$
|
55,686
|
|
|
$
|
39,831
|
|
|
$
|
27,143
|
|
|
$
|
16,889
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
67,741
|
|
|
$
|
55,686
|
|
|
$
|
39,831
|
|
|
$
|
27,143
|
|
|
$
|
19,235
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic
|
|
|
43,365,872
|
|
|
|
43,330,166
|
|
|
|
43,913,119
|
|
|
|
42,445,991
|
|
|
|
33,147,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted
|
|
|
45,336,561
|
|
|
|
44,634,191
|
|
|
|
46,016,364
|
|
|
|
45,364,257
|
|
|
|
42,624,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
22,380
|
|
|
$
|
19,473
|
|
|
$
|
14,747
|
|
|
$
|
8,765
|
|
|
$
|
4,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
(101,326
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,286
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,740
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,929
|
)
|
Capitalization of software and website development costs
|
|
|
(6,516
|
)
|
|
|
(7,168
|
)
|
|
|
(5,696
|
)
|
|
|
(4,189
|
)
|
|
|
(2,656
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44,367
|
|
|
|
35,713
|
|
|
|
25,193
|
|
|
|
14,874
|
|
|
|
7,786
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
|
153,701
|
|
|
|
120,051
|
|
|
|
87,731
|
|
|
|
54,240
|
|
|
|
34,637
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(123,865
|
)
|
|
|
(57,595
|
)
|
|
|
(58,056
|
)
|
|
|
(62,177
|
)
|
|
|
(71,410
|
)
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
(31,243
|
)
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
12,716
|
|
|
|
74,851
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
162,727
|
|
|
$
|
133,988
|
|
|
$
|
103,145
|
|
|
$
|
69,464
|
|
|
$
|
64,653
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,598
|
|
|
|
38,578
|
|
|
|
43,474
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
249,961
|
|
|
|
193,622
|
|
|
|
154,520
|
|
|
|
106,192
|
|
|
|
50,311
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
477,889
|
|
|
|
369,549
|
|
|
|
315,952
|
|
|
|
234,853
|
|
|
|
171,392
|
|
Total long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,465
|
|
|
|
19,507
|
|
|
|
21,772
|
|
|
|
23,046
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
376,114
|
|
|
|
285,534
|
|
|
|
242,505
|
|
|
|
176,060
|
|
|
|
123,984
|
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis of the financial
condition and results of our operations should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the
notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual
Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ
materially from those discussed below. Factors that could cause
or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited
to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section
titled Risk Factors included elsewhere in this
Annual Report.
Executive
Overview
In 2010, we reported 30% revenue growth to $670.0 million.
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) grew 19% to EPS of
$1.49.
Our long-term goal is to continue to grow profitably and become
the leading online provider of micro business marketing
solutions. We believe that the strength of our solution gives us
the opportunity not only to capture an increasing share of the
existing printing needs in our targeted markets, but also to
address marketing services demand by making available to our
customers cost-effective solutions to grow their businesses. In
order to accomplish this objective, we intend to execute on the
following:
Provide All
Things Marketing for Micro Businesses
We believe our customers currently spend only a small portion of
their annual budget for marketing products and services with us.
By expanding the scope of our services and by improving the
quality and selection of our products and services along with
the customer experience, we intend to increase the amount of
money our customers spend with us each year. During fiscal year
2010, we added personalized notebooks, mugs, on-line search
profiles, new business card options, ladies t-shirts,
stickers, mailing labels and other offerings. We also acquired
Soft Sight to support future entry into the custom embroidered
product market. We plan to continue to expand and enhance our
product and service offerings in order to provide a greater
selection to our existing customers and to attract customers
seeking a variety of products and services. Additionally, by
continuing to improve our customer acquisition and retention
marketing programs, our customer service, sales and design
support, and our value proposition, we seek to increase the
number of products purchased by each customer.
Expand Global
Reach
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, revenue generated
from
non-United
States websites accounted for approximately 45% of our total
revenue. We believe that we have significant opportunity
44
to expand our revenue both in the countries we currently service
and in additional countries worldwide. We opened a European
marketing office in Barcelona, Spain in January 2007 to focus on
the implementation of our European growth initiatives. We
completed construction of a production facility near Melbourne,
Australia and launched our marketing office in Sydney, Australia
in June 2010 to support our customers in Australia, New Zealand,
Japan and Singapore. We also intend to continue geographic
expansion of our marketing efforts and customer service
capabilities and opened two new customer support and design
centers that support European customers (one in Tunis, Tunisia,
and the other in Berlin, Germany). In addition, we intend to
further extend our geographic and international scope by
continuing to introduce localized websites in different
countries and languages and by offering graphic design content
and products specific to local markets. During fiscal 2010 we
launched websites in Austria, Portugal and Singapore.
Home &
Family
Although we expect to maintain our primary focus on the micro
business market, we believe that our customer support, sales and
design services, and low production costs are differentiating
factors that make purchasing from us an attractive alternative
for individual consumers. We intend to add new products and
services targeted at the consumer market, and we believe that
the economies of scale provided by cross selling these products
to our extensive micro business customer base, our large
production order volumes and integrated design and production
facilities will enable us to profitably grow our consumer
business. During fiscal 2010, we launched or enhanced several
products that appeal to home and family customers, including
photo books, mugs, stickers, and premium wedding and
holiday-themed content.
Recent
Developments
On August 31, 2009, we effected the Change of Domicile,
pursuant to which we effectively moved the place of
incorporation of the publicly traded parent entity of the
Vistaprint group of companies from Bermuda to the Netherlands.
Pursuant to the Change of Domicile, the common shareholders of
Vistaprint Limited became ordinary shareholders of Vistaprint
N.V., Vistaprint Limited became a wholly owned subsidiary of
Vistaprint N.V, and Vistaprint N.V. assumed Vistaprint
Limiteds existing obligations in connection with awards
granted under Vistaprint Limiteds incentive plans and
other similar employee awards.
On July 1, 2009, Robert Keane, our chief executive officer,
relocated to a new office in Paris, France, which operates as
Vistaprint SARL. Other activities that are or are planned to be
located in our Paris headquarters include corporate strategy,
talent development and corporate communications.
The Change of Domicile and the establishment of our Paris
headquarters did not have and are not anticipated to have a
material impact on how we conduct our
day-to-day
operations, consolidated effective tax rate or our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
An independent foundation, Stichting Continuïteit
Vistaprint (the Foundation), was established to
safeguard the interests of Vistaprint and its shareholders and
to assist in maintaining the Companys continuity and
independence. On November 16, 2009, we entered into a Call
Option Agreement with the Foundation pursuant to which the
Foundation may acquire a number of our preferred shares up to a
maximum of the total number of our ordinary shares then
outstanding at an exercise price of 0.01 per share. The
call option held by the Foundation is designed to provide a
protective measure against unsolicited take-over bids for
Vistaprint or other hostile threats through the issuance of
preferred shares to the Foundation that would give the
Foundation voting and dispositive power over up to 50% of our
outstanding securities.
On December 30, 2009, we acquired 100% of the outstanding
equity of Soft Sight, a privately-held developer of embroidery
digitization software based in the United States, for
$6.5 million in cash.
45
Soft Sights proprietary software enables a customers
uploaded artwork to be automatically converted into embroidery
stitch patterns for subsequent manufacturing. We plan to launch
the new embroidered products to our customer base in fiscal 2011.
We assigned the value of the consideration transferred to
acquire Soft Sight to the tangible assets and identifiable
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, on the basis
of their fair values at the date of acquisition. The difference
between the purchase price and the fair value of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. This
goodwill, totaling $4.2 million, relates to the potential
synergies from the integration of the Soft Sight embroidery
software capabilities into the Vistaprint product offering. The
allocations recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2010 included $2.6 million of intangible
assets and a $1.1 million deferred tax liability.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP). To apply these principles, we must make
estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. In some
instances, we reasonably could have used different accounting
estimates and, in other instances, changes in the accounting
estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period.
Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from our
estimates. To the extent that there are material differences
between these estimates and actual results, our financial
condition or results of operations will be affected. We base our
estimates and judgments on historical experience and other
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable at the time under
the circumstances, and we evaluate these estimates and judgments
on an ongoing basis. We refer to accounting estimates and
judgments of this type as critical accounting policies and
estimates, which we discuss further below.
Revenue Recognition. We generate
revenue primarily from the sale and shipping of customized
manufactured products, as well as from electronic services,
website design and hosting, email marketing services and order
referral fees. We recognize revenue arising from sales of
products and services when it is realized or realizable and
earned. We consider revenue realized or realizable and earned
when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, a product
has been shipped or service rendered with no significant
post-delivery obligation on our part, the sales price is fixed
or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. For
subscription services we recognize as revenue the fees we charge
customers ratably over the term of the service arrangement.
Shipping, handling and processing costs billed to customers are
included in revenue and the related costs are included in cost
of revenue. Revenue is recognized net of discounts we offer to
our customers as part of advertising campaigns. A reserve for
sales returns and allowances is recorded as a reduction of
revenue when we sell the initial product. We base our estimate
for sales returns and allowances on historical experience or
specific identification of an event necessitating a reserve.
Software and Website Development
Costs. We capitalize eligible
salaries and payroll-related costs of employees who devote time
to the development of internal-use computer software.
Capitalization begins when the preliminary project stage is
complete, management with the relevant authority authorizes and
commits to the funding of the software project, and it is
probable that the project will be completed and the software
will be used to perform the function intended. These costs are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
life of the software, which is generally two years. Our judgment
is required in determining the point at which various projects
enter the stages at which costs may be capitalized, in assessing
the ongoing value and impairment of the capitalized costs, and
in determining the estimated useful lives over which the costs
are amortized.
46
Income Taxes. We make estimates
and judgments in determining our income tax expense, and in the
calculation of our tax assets and liabilities. Our corporate tax
rate is a combination of the tax rates of the jurisdictions
where we conduct business.
Deferred income taxes are determined using the liability method.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based
on the differences between the financial statement carrying
values and the tax bases and are measured by applying currently
enacted tax rates and laws to taxable years in which such
differences are expected to reverse. We record a valuation
allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is
believed more likely than not to be realized. We regularly
review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and estimate a
valuation allowance based on historical taxable income,
projected future taxable income and the expected timing of the
reversals of existing temporary differences. Our judgment is
required to determine, among other things, whether an increase
or decrease of a valuation allowance is warranted. We will
increase the valuation allowance if we operate at a loss or are
unable to generate sufficient future taxable income. Any changes
in the valuation allowance could affect our tax expense,
financial position and results of operations.
We recognize, present and disclose in our financial statements
uncertain tax positions we have taken, or we expect to take on a
tax return, whereby we recognize the tax benefit from an
uncertain tax position if it is more likely than not that the
tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing
authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The
tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such
positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that
has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon
ultimate settlement. The unrecognized tax benefits will reduce
our effective tax rate when recognized. Interest and penalties
related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in the
provision for income taxes.
The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment
in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of
GAAP and complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in
a manner inconsistent with managements expectations could
have a material impact on the Companys financial condition
and operating results.
Share-Based Compensation. We
measure compensation cost for share-based compensation at fair
value, including estimated forfeitures, and recognize the
expense as compensation expense over the period that the
recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the
award, which generally is the vesting period. We use the
Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the fair value of
stock options. This model requires significant estimates related
to the awards expected life and future stock price
volatility of the underlying equity security. In determining the
amount of expense to be recorded, we also are required to
estimate forfeiture rates for awards, based on the probability
that employees will complete the required service period. We
estimate the forfeiture rate based on historical experience. If
actual forfeitures differ significantly from our estimates,
additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required
in future periods.
Property, Plant and Equipment. We
periodically evaluate the net realizable value of our property,
plant and equipment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be
recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are
present, the carrying value of the asset is evaluated in
relation to the operating performance and estimated future
undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.
If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated future
cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair
value. Cash flow projections are based on trends of historical
performance and our estimate of future performance.
Litigation and Contingencies. We
are subject to various loss contingencies arising in the
ordinary course of business. We consider the likelihood of loss
or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as
well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in
determining
47
loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued
when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a
liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be
reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information
available to us to determine whether such accruals should be
adjusted. Specific information regarding litigation we are
involved in is included under Item 3. Legal
Proceedings.
Business Combinations. We assign
the value of the consideration transferred to acquire a business
to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair
values at the date of acquisition. We assess the fair value of
assets, including intangible assets, using a variety of methods
and each asset is measured at fair value from the perspective of
a market participant. The method used to estimate the fair
values of intangible assets incorporates significant assumptions
regarding the estimates a market participant would make in order
to evaluate an asset, including a market participants use
of the asset and the appropriate discount rates for a market
participant. Assets recorded from the perspective of a market
participant that are determined to not have economic use for us
are expensed immediately. Any excess purchase price over the
fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is
allocated to goodwill. Transaction costs and restructuring costs
associated with a transaction to acquire a business are expensed
as incurred.
Intangible Assets. Intangible
assets include intellectual property consisting primarily of
patents, domain names and customer lists. We record acquired
intangible assets at fair value on the date of acquisition and
amortize such assets using the straight-line method over the
assets expected useful life, unless another method is
deemed to be more appropriate. For patents developed internally,
we capitalize costs incurred to obtain patents, including
attorney fees, registration fees, consulting fees, and other
expenditures directly related to securing the patent. The costs
of pursuing others who are believed to infringe on the
Companys patents, as well as costs of defending our
patents against infringement claims, are expensed as incurred.
We evaluate the remaining useful life of intangible assets on a
periodic basis to determine whether events and circumstances
warrant a revision to the remaining useful life. If the estimate
of an intangible assets remaining useful life is changed,
we amortize the remaining carrying value of the intangible asset
prospectively over the revised remaining useful life.
Goodwill. Goodwill is evaluated
for impairment on an annual basis during the fiscal third
quarter, or more frequently if certain indicators are present or
changes in circumstances suggest that impairment may exist.
Recently Issued
Accounting Pronouncements
See Item 8 of Part II, Financial Statements and
Supplementary DataNote 2Summary of Significant
Accounting PoliciesRecently Adopted Accounting
Pronouncements and Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements.
48
Results of
Operations
The following table presents our historical operating results
for the periods indicated as a percentage of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
As a percentage of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
35.8%
|
|
|
|
37.2%
|
|
|
|
38.5%
|
|
Technology and development expense
|
|
|
11.7%
|
|
|
|
11.8%
|
|
|
|
11.2%
|
|
Marketing and selling expense
|
|
|
32.3%
|
|
|
|
30.9%
|
|
|
|
31.9%
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
8.7%
|
|
|
|
8.2%
|
|
|
|
8.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
11.5%
|
|
|
|
11.9%
|
|
|
|
10.3%
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
|
|
0.4%
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(0.2)%
|
|
|
|
(0.1)%
|
|
|
|
0.1%
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.2%
|
|
|
|
0.3%
|
|
|
|
0.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
11.2%
|
|
|
|
11.9%
|
|
|
|
11.0%
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
10.1%
|
|
|
|
10.8%
|
|
|
|
9.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years
Ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008
In
thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
2010-2009
|
|
2009-2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
670,035
|
|
|
$
|
515,826
|
|
|
$
|
400,657
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
240,195
|
|
|
$
|
191,944
|
|
|
$
|
154,122
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
% of revenue
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
|
|
37.2
|
%
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
We generate revenue primarily from the sale and shipment of
customized manufactured products, as well as certain digital
services, such as website design and hosting and email marketing
services. We also generate revenue from order referral fees,
revenue share and other fees paid to us by merchants for
customer click-throughs, distribution of third-party promotional
materials and referrals arising from products and services of
the merchants we offer to our customers on our website. Unlike
tangible products that we offer, these third party referral
offerings do not require physical production and have minimal
corresponding direct cost of revenue. During the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2010, we eliminated the third party
membership discount program previously offered on our websites
and terminated our relationship with our partner for these
programs.
To understand our revenue trends, we monitor several key metrics
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Website sessions. A session is
measured each time a computer user visits a Vistaprint website
from their Internet browser. We measure this data to understand
the volume and source of traffic to our websites. Typically, we
use various advertising campaigns to increase the number and
quality of shoppers entering our websites. The number of website
sessions varies from month to month depending on variables such
as product campaigns and advertising channels used.
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion rates. The conversion
rate is the number of customer orders divided by the total
number of sessions during a specific period of time. Typically,
we strive to increase conversion rates of customers entering our
websites in order to increase the number of customer orders
generated. Conversion rates have fluctuated in the past and we
anticipate that they will fluctuate in the future due to, among
other factors, the type of advertising campaigns and marketing
channels used.
|
|
|
|
Average order value. Average order
value is total bookings, which represents the value of total
customer orders received on our websites, for a given period of
time divided by the total number of customer orders recorded
during that same period of time. We seek to increase average
order value as a means of increasing revenue. Average order
values have fluctuated in the past and we anticipate that they
will fluctuate in the future depending upon the type of products
promoted during a period and promotional discounts offered. For
example, among other things, seasonal product offerings, such as
holiday cards, can cause changes in average order values.
|
We believe the analysis of these metrics provides us with
important information on customer buying behavior, advertising
campaign effectiveness and the resulting impact on overall
revenue trends and profitability. While we continually seek and
test ways to increase revenue, we also attempt to increase the
number of customer acquisitions and to grow profits. As a
result, fluctuations in these metrics are usual and expected.
Because changes in any one of these metrics may be offset by
changes in another metric, no single factor is determinative of
our revenue and profitability trends and we assess them together
to understand their overall impact on revenue and profitability.
Revenue increased 30% to $670.0 million, from fiscal 2009
to fiscal 2010, primarily due to increases in sales across our
product and service offerings, as well as across geographies.
The overall growth during this period was driven by increases in
website sessions, which grew by 29% to 305.2 million, and
increases in average order value, which grew by 6.8% to $35.12.
Revenue from our
non-United
States websites accounted for 45% of total revenues for fiscal
2010 as compared to 39% of revenue during fiscal 2009 and the
weaker U.S. dollar positively impacted our revenue growth
rate by an estimated 200 basis points over the same period.
These increases were partially offset by a decline in conversion
rates of 10 basis points to 6.3% and a decrease in revenue
from third-party referral fees which declined from approximately
$25.9 million to $12.4 million over the same prior
year period. Referral fee revenue from membership discount
programs was approximately 3.9% of total revenues in fiscal
2009, but declined to 0.8% for fiscal 2010 as a result of the
termination of the third-party membership discount programs in
the second quarter of fiscal 2010 that were previously offered
on our websites. We did not generate any revenues from third
party membership discount programs in the second half of fiscal
year 2010 and do not expect to generate any such revenues in the
future. As our total customer base has grown, we also have
continued to experience growth in purchases from existing
customers. Bookings from repeat customers accounted for 67% of
total bookings for the year ended June 30, 2010 as compared
to 66% of total bookings for the year ended June 30, 2009.
Revenue increased 29% to $515.8 million, from fiscal 2008
to fiscal 2009, primarily due to increases in sales of our micro
business marketing products. The overall growth during this
period was driven by increases in website sessions, conversion
rates and a positive impact from new product and service
offerings. During this period, our website sessions grew by 22%
to 235.9 million, conversion rates grew by 50 basis
points to 6.4% and our average order value remained constant at
approximately $33. As our total customer base has grown, we also
have continued to experience growth in purchases from existing
customers. Bookings from repeat customers increased from 64% of
total bookings in fiscal 2008 to 66% of total bookings in fiscal
2009. Revenue from our
non-United
States websites accounted for 39% of total revenues for fiscal
2009 as compared to 38% of total revenue during fiscal 2008. In
addition, our revenue growth rate was negatively impacted by an
estimated 700 basis points resulting from a stronger
U.S. dollar as compared to the prior fiscal year.
50
Cost of
revenue
Cost of revenue includes materials used to manufacture our
products, payroll and related expenses for production personnel,
depreciation of assets used in the production process and in
support of digital service offerings, shipping and postage
costs, and other miscellaneous related costs of products sold by
us.
The increase in cost of revenue from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010
was primarily attributable to the production costs associated
with increased volume of shipments of products during this
period. The decrease in cost of revenue as a percentage of
revenue from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2010 was primarily
attributable to improved pricing agreements in relation to
purchases of materials and shipping costs, productivity
improvements at our manufacturing locations, and shifts in
product mix including an increase in sales of digital services.
These improvements were partially offset by a decrease in
referral revenue and a strengthening of the Canadian dollar,
which negatively impacted the raw material and labor costs of
our Canadian production operations.
The increase in cost of revenue from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009
was primarily attributable to the production costs associated
with increased volume of shipments of products during this
period. The decrease in the cost of revenue as a percentage of
total revenue for fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 was
primarily driven by productivity improvements at our
manufacturing locations, improved pricing agreements in relation
to purchases of materials and a weaker Canadian dollar, which
positively impacted the raw material and labor costs of our
Canadian production operations. In addition, shifts in product
mix, including an increase in sales of electronic services,
partially offset by a decrease in referral revenue, contributed
to a decrease in cost of revenue as a percentage of sales.
In
thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
2010-2009
|
|
2009-2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
Technology and development expense
|
|
$
|
78,387
|
|
|
$
|
60,921
|
|
|
$
|
44,828
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
% of revenue
|
|
|
11.7%
|
|
|
|
11.8%
|
|
|
|
11.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing and selling expense
|
|
$
|
216,574
|
|
|
$
|
159,143
|
|
|
$
|
127,975
|
|
|
|
36%
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
% of revenue
|
|
|
32.3%
|
|
|
|
30.9%
|
|
|
|
31.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
58,031
|
|
|
$
|
42,236
|
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
|
|
37%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
% of revenue
|
|
|
8.7%
|
|
|
|
8.2%
|
|
|
|
8.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology and
development expense
Technology and development expense consists primarily of payroll
and related expenses for software and manufacturing engineering,
content development, amortization of capitalized software and
website development costs, information technology operations,
hosting of our websites, asset depreciation, patent amortization
and miscellaneous technology infrastructure-related costs.
Depreciation expense for information technology equipment that
directly supports the delivery of our digital services products
is included in cost of revenue.
The increase in our technology and development expenses of
$17.5 million for fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009
was primarily due to increased payroll and benefit costs of
$10.4 million associated with increased headcount in our
technology development and information technology support
organizations. At June 30, 2010, we employed
375 employees in these organizations compared to
302 employees at June 30, 2009. In addition, to
support our continued revenue growth during this period, we
continued to invest in our website infrastructure, which
resulted in increased
51
depreciation and hosting services expense of $2.4 million,
increased third-party consulting services of $0.8 million,
and increased other expenses of $3.0 million for fiscal
2010 as compared to fiscal 2009. Fiscal 2010 included
$0.9 million of expense related to the abandonment of
certain acquired intangibles recorded in conjunction with the
Soft Sight acquisition that were measured at fair value based on
the perspective of a market participant, but were determined not
to have an economic use for Vistaprint and were abandoned.
The increase in our technology and development expenses of
$16.1 million for fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008
was primarily due to increased payroll and benefit costs of
$8.8 million and increased share-based compensation costs
of $1.0 million associated with increased employee hiring
in our technology development and information technology support
organizations. At June 30, 2009, we employed
302 employees in these organizations compared to
239 employees at June 30, 2008. The increase in
headcount has resulted in an increase in allocated overhead of
$1.7 million compared to fiscal 2008. Allocated overhead
consists primarily of facility-related expenses. In addition, to
support our continued revenue growth during this period, we
continued to invest in our website infrastructure, which
resulted in increased depreciation and hosting service expenses
of $3.4 million for fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008.
Marketing and
selling expense
Marketing and selling expense consists primarily of advertising
and promotional costs; payroll and related expenses for our
employees engaged in marketing, sales, customer support and
public relations activities; and third party payment processor
and credit card fees.
The increase in our marketing and selling expenses of
$57.4 million for fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009
was driven primarily by increases of $39.5 million in
advertising costs and commissions related to new customer
acquisition and costs of promotions targeted at our existing
customer base, and increases in payroll and benefits related
costs of $12.9 million. During this period, we continued to
expand our marketing organization and our design, sales and
services centers including the addition of our facilities in
Berlin, Germany and Tunis, Tunisia. At June 30, 2010, we
employed 806 employees in these organizations compared to
609 employees at June 30, 2009. In addition, payment
processing fees paid to third-parties increased by
$2.8 million during fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009
due to increased order volumes.
The increase in our marketing and selling expenses of
$31.2 million for fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008
was driven primarily by increases of $21.4 million in
advertising costs related to new customer acquisition and costs
of promotions targeted at our existing customer base, increases
in payroll and benefits related costs of $5.4 million, and
increased share-based compensation costs of $0.3 million.
During this period, we continued to expand our total marketing
organization and design, sales and customer support operations.
At June 30, 2009, we employed 609 employees in these
organizations compared to 594 employees at June 30,
2008.
General and
administrative expense
General and administrative expense consists primarily of general
corporate costs, including third party professional fees and
payroll and related expense of employees involved in finance,
legal, human resource and general executive management. Third
party professional fees include finance, legal, human resources,
and insurance.
The increase in our general and administrative expenses of
$15.8 million for fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009
was primarily due to increased payroll and benefit costs of
$8.0 million resulting from the continued growth of our
executive management, finance, legal and human resource
organizations to support our expansion and growth, and increased
third-party professional fees of $5.6 million related to
ongoing litigation, the execution of our change of domicile to
the Netherlands,
52
and other general and administrative activities including
recruitment. At June 30, 2010, we employed
199 employees in these organizations compared to
141 employees at June 30, 2009. The increase in
headcount has resulted in an increase in allocated overhead of
$1.1 million as compared to fiscal 2009.
The increase in our general and administrative expenses of
$9.7 million for fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008 was
primarily due to increased share-based compensation costs of
$3.5 million, increased payroll and benefit costs of
$3.4 million, and increased third party professional fees
of $2.9 million. At June 30, 2009, we employed
141 employees in these organizations compared to
132 employees at June 30, 2008.
Interest
income
Interest income, which consists of interest income earned on
cash, cash equivalents and investments, was $0.4 million,
$1.7 million and $4.2 million during fiscal 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively. The change in each year was primarily
due to lower interest rate yields despite increased cash and
investments balances.
Other (expense)
income, net
Other (expense) income, net, which primarily consists of gains
and losses from currency transactions or revaluation, was
$1.5 million of expense, $0.8 million of expense and
$0.4 million of income for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Increases and decreases in other (expense) income,
net are due to changes in currency exchange rates on
transactions or balances denominated in currencies other than
the functional currency of our subsidiaries.
Interest
expense
Interest expense, which consists of interest and penalties paid
to financial institutions on outstanding balances on our credit
facilities, was $0.8 million, $1.4 million and
$1.7 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The decrease each year was due to a decrease in the outstanding
principal on our bank loans as compared to the prior year
period. As a result of the early repayment of $5.9 million
of our euro revolving credit agreement, we incurred
$0.1 million in prepayment penalties for fiscal 2010.
Income tax
provision
In
thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
7,273
|
|
|
$
|
5,417
|
|
|
$
|
4,261
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
9.7%
|
|
|
|
8.9%
|
|
|
|
9.7%
|
|
Income tax expense was $7.3 million, $5.4 million, and
$4.3 million for fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
The increase in the effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 as
compared to fiscal 2009 is primarily attributable to the
expiration of the U.S. federal research and development tax
credit offset by the benefit associated with geographic earnings
mix.
The decrease in the effective tax rate in fiscal 2009 as
compared to fiscal 2008 is due to a geographic shift in profits,
resulting in increased profits residing in jurisdictions with
lower tax rates.
53
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows Data:
In
thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
(101,326)
|
|
|
$
|
(76,286)
|
|
|
$
|
(62,740)
|
|
Capitalization of software and website development costs
|
|
|
(6,516)
|
|
|
|
(7,168)
|
|
|
|
(5,696)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44,367
|
|
|
|
35,713
|
|
|
|
25,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
|
153,701
|
|
|
|
120,051
|
|
|
|
87,731
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(123,865)
|
|
|
|
(57,595)
|
|
|
|
(58,056)
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
(31,243)
|
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
At June 30, 2010, we had $162.7 million of cash and
cash equivalents primarily consisting of money market funds and
$9.6 million of marketable securities with maturities less
than one year consisting of corporate debt securities,
U.S. government and agency securities and certificates of
deposit. During fiscal 2010, we financed our operations
primarily through internally generated cash flows from
operations. We believe that our available cash and cash flows
generated from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our
working capital, long-term debt and capital expenditure
requirements for the foreseeable future.
Operating Activities. Cash
provided by operating activities in fiscal 2010 was
$153.7 million and consisted of net income of
$67.7 million, positive adjustments for non-cash items of
$62.2 million and $23.7 million provided by working
capital and other activities. Adjustments for non-cash items
included $44.4 million of depreciation and amortization
expense on property, plant and equipment and software and
website development costs, $22.4 million of share-based
compensation expense, $0.9 million for the write off of
intangible assets acquired in a business acquisition and
$0.5 million from the loss on sale, disposal, or impairment
of long-lived assets, offset by $6.3 million of tax
benefits derived from share-base compensation. The change in
working capital and other activities, excluding the impact of an
acquisition, primarily consisted of an increase of
$19.7 million in accrued expenses and other liabilities, an
increase of $6.2 million in accounts payable, and a
decrease of $3.8 million in prepaid expenses and other
assets. This was partially offset by an increase of
$3.7 million in accounts receivable and an increase of
$2.2 million in inventory. The increase in accrued expenses
and other liabilities is driven primarily by increases in
accrued payroll and benefit costs $5.5 million, increases
in tax liabilities including indirect taxes of $5.2 million
related to indirect taxes to be remitted on sales, and increases
in accrued marketing and shipping expenses of $2.9 million
and $0.6 million, respectively.
Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2009 was
$120.1 million and consisted of net income of
$55.7 million, positive adjustments for non-cash items of
$42.9 million and $21.4 million provided by working
capital and other activities. Adjustments for non-cash items
included $35.7 million of depreciation and amortization
expense on property and equipment and software and website
development costs, $19.5 million of share-based
compensation expense and $1.9 million of loss on disposal
or impairment of long-lived assets, offset by $4.5 million
of deferred taxes, and $9.6 million of tax benefits derived
from share-based compensation. Working capital and other
activities primarily consisted of an increase of
$24.8 million in accrued expenses and other liabilities, an
increase of $3.1 million in accounts payable, and a
decrease of $0.3 million in accounts receivable. This was
partially offset by an increase of $4.9 million in prepaid
expenses and other assets and an increase of $1.9 million
in inventory.
54
Investing Activities. Cash used in
investing activities in fiscal 2010 of $123.9 million was
attributable primarily to capital expenditures of
$101.3 million, purchases of marketable securities of
$9.8 million, the purchase of Soft Sight, net of cash
acquired, for $6.5 million, capitalized software and
website development costs of $6.5 million, offset by
proceeds from the sale of equipment of $0.2 million, and
maturities of marketable securities of $0.1 million.
Capital expenditures of $61.7 million were related to
purchase of land and facilities, $23.1 million were related
to the purchase of manufacturing equipment for our production
facilities, and $16.5 million were related to purchases of
other assets including information technology infrastructure and
office equipment.
Cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2009 of
$57.6 million was attributable primarily to capital
expenditures of $76.3 million and by capitalized software
and website development costs of $7.2 million, offset by
net sales of marketable securities of $25.9 million.
Capital expenditures of $30.9 million were related to the
purchase of production equipment for our printing facilities,
$34.9 million were related to construction and land
acquisition costs at our production facilities and
$10.5 million were related to purchases of information
technology and facility related assets.
Financing Activities. Cash
provided by financing activities in fiscal 2010 of
$1.3 million was primarily attributable to the issuance of
ordinary shares pursuant to share option exercises of
$15.0 million and tax benefits derived from shared-based
compensation awards of $6.3 million. This was offset by
payments in connection with our loan agreements of
$13.8 million, including the final balloon payment on our
original Canadian credit agreement of $6.0 million and
payment of the remaining principal balance of the euro revolving
credit agreement in the Companys Dutch subsidiary in the
amount of $5.9 million. We also used $6.1 million to
pay minimum withholding taxes related to the vesting of
restricted share units (RSUs) granted and ordinary
shares withheld under our equity incentive plans.
Cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2009 of
$31.2 million was primarily attributable to the repurchase
of 2,554,302 common shares for $45.5 million, payments in
connection with our bank loans of $3.2 million and the use
of $4.2 million to pay minimum withholding taxes related to
the vesting of RSUs granted under our equity incentive plans,
partially offset by the issuance of ordinary shares pursuant to
share option exercises of $12.1 million and
$9.6 million of tax benefits derived from share-based
compensation awards.
Contractual
Obligations
Contractual obligations at June 30, 2010 are as follows:
In
thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than 1
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
than 5
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
year
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
Debt obligations (1)
|
|
$
|
5,222
|
|
|
$
|
5,222
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
46,155
|
|
|
|
7,170
|
|
|
|
13,528
|
|
|
|
13,187
|
|
|
|
12,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (2)
|
|
$
|
51,377
|
|
|
$
|
12,392
|
|
|
$
|
13,528
|
|
|
$
|
13,187
|
|
|
$
|
12,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Debt obligations exclude amounts payable for interest. |
(2) |
|
We may be required to make cash outlays related to our
unrecognized tax benefits. However, due to the uncertainty of
the timing of future cash flows associated with our unrecognized
tax benefits, we are unable to make reasonably reliable
estimates of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the
respective taxing authorities. Accordingly, unrecognized tax
benefits of $2.3 million as of June 30, 2010 have been
excluded from the contractual obligations table above. For
further information on unrecognized tax benefits, see
Item 8 of Part II, Financial Statements and
Supplementary DataNote 10Income Taxes. |
55
Long-Term Debt. During the second
quarter of fiscal 2010, the remaining balance of our euro
revolving credit agreement and the final balloon payment on our
original Canadian credit agreement were paid in the amounts of
$6.1 million and $6.0 million, respectively.
In December 2005, we amended our original Canadian credit
agreement to include an additional $10.0 million equipment
term loan. The borrowings were used to finance printing
equipment purchases for the Windsor production facility. The
loan is payable in monthly installments, which began
December 1, 2006 and continue through 2010, plus interest,
with the remaining balance of $4.7 million to be paid in
December 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the interest rates on
the amended Canadian credit agreement range from 7.82% to 8.50%
and there was $5.2 million outstanding under this term loan.
Operating Leases. We rent office
space under operating leases expiring on various dates through
2018. Future rental payments required under our leases are an
aggregate of approximately $46.2 million. The terms of the
individual lease agreements require security deposits in the
form of bank guarantees and a letter of credit in the amount of
$0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
Purchase Commitments. At
June 30, 2010, we had unrecorded commitments under
contracts to expand our Canadian production facility of
approximately $1.4 million, and commitments under contract
for site development and construction of our Jamaican customer
support and design center of approximately $2.9 million. We
also had unrecorded commitments under contracts at June 30,
2010 to purchase production equipment for our Dutch and
Australian production facilities of approximately
$1.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure
to interest rate risk relates primarily to our cash equivalents
and marketable securities that at June 30, 2010 consisted
of money market funds, certificates of deposit, corporate debt
securities, U.S government and agency securities, and a
long-term investment in a municipal auction rate security. These
cash equivalents and marketable securities are held for working
capital purposes and we do not enter into investments for
trading or speculative purposes. Our fixed rate interest bearing
securities could decline in value if interest rates rise. Due to
the nature of our investments, we do not believe we have a
material exposure to interest rate risk.
Currency Exchange Rate Risk. As we
conduct business in multiple international currencies through
our worldwide operations but report our financial results in
U.S. dollars, we are affected by fluctuations in exchange
rates of such currencies versus the U.S. dollar as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Translation of our
non-U.S. dollar
revenues and expenses: Revenue and related expenses
generated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar could
result in higher or lower net income when, upon consolidation,
those transactions are translated to U.S. dollar. When the
value or timing of revenue and expenses in a given currency are
materially different, we may be exposed to significant impacts
on our net income.
|
|
|
|
Remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities:
Transaction gains and losses generated from remeasurement of
monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other
than the functional currency of a subsidiary are included in
other (expense) income, net on the consolidated statements of
income. Our subsidiaries have intercompany accounts that are
eliminated in consolidation, and cash and cash equivalents
denominated in various currencies that expose us to fluctuations
in currency exchange rates. We considered the historical trends
in currency exchange rates. A hypothetical 10% change in
currency exchange rates was applied to total net monetary assets
denominated in currencies other than the local currencies at the
balance sheet dates to compute the impact these changes
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
would have had on our income before taxes in the near term. A
hypothetical decrease in exchange rates of 10% against the
functional currency of our subsidiaries would have resulted in a
decrease of $0.7 million and $1.6 million on our
income before income taxes for the fiscal years 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation of our
non-U.S. dollar
assets and liabilities: Each of our subsidiaries
translates their assets and liabilities to U.S. dollars at
current rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date.
The resulting gains and losses from translation are included as
a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income on
the balance sheet. Fluctuations in exchange rates can materially
impact the carrying value of our assets and liabilities.
|
Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains included in other
(expense) income, net for the years ended June 30, 2010,
2009 and 2008 were $(1,491), $(803) and $427, respectively.
57
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
VISTAPRINT
N.V.
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
58
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Supervisory Board and Shareholders of
Vistaprint N.V.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Vistaprint N.V. (previously Vistaprint Limited)(the
Company) as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders
equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended June 30, 2010. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Vistaprint N.V. at June 30, 2010 and
2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
June 30, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Vistaprint N.V.s internal control over financial reporting
as of June 30, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated August 27, 2010 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Boston, Massachusetts
August 27, 2010
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
162,727
|
|
|
$
|
133,988
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $53 and $172,
respectively
|
|
|
9,389
|
|
|
|
5,672
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
6,223
|
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
15,059
|
|
|
|
12,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
203,002
|
|
|
|
156,863
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
249,961
|
|
|
|
193,622
|
|
Software and web site development costs, net
|
|
|
6,426
|
|
|
|
6,754
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
7,277
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
11,223
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
477,889
|
|
|
$
|
369,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
16,664
|
|
|
$
|
11,347
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
65,609
|
|
|
|
43,724
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,138
|
|
|
|
3,393
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
5,222
|
|
|
|
8,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
91,633
|
|
|
|
66,813
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6,991
|
|
|
|
5,100
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
101,775
|
|
|
|
84,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, par value 0.01 per share,
120,000,000 shares authorized; 49,891,244 and
49,175,223 shares issued and 43,855,164 and
42,805,811 shares outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
Treasury shares, at cost, 6,036,080 and 6,369,412 shares,
respectively
|
|
|
(29,637
|
)
|
|
|
(29,881
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
249,153
|
|
|
|
212,221
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
166,525
|
|
|
|
98,784
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(10,625
|
)
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
376,114
|
|
|
|
285,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
477,889
|
|
|
$
|
369,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
670,035
|
|
|
$
|
515,826
|
|
|
$
|
400,657
|
|
Cost of revenue (1)
|
|
|
240,195
|
|
|
|
191,944
|
|
|
|
154,122
|
|
Technology and development expense (1)
|
|
|
78,387
|
|
|
|
60,921
|
|
|
|
44,828
|
|
Marketing and selling expense (1)
|
|
|
216,574
|
|
|
|
159,143
|
|
|
|
127,975
|
|
General and administrative expense (1)
|
|
|
58,031
|
|
|
|
42,236
|
|
|
|
32,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
76,848
|
|
|
|
61,582
|
|
|
|
41,160
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1,491
|
)
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
|
427
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
75,014
|
|
|
|
61,103
|
|
|
|
44,092
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
7,273
|
|
|
|
5,417
|
|
|
|
4,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
67,741
|
|
|
$
|
55,686
|
|
|
$
|
39,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic
|
|
|
43,365,872
|
|
|
|
43,330,166
|
|
|
|
43,913,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted
|
|
|
45,336,561
|
|
|
|
44,634,191
|
|
|
|
46,016,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Share-based compensation is allocated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
840
|
|
|
$
|
745
|
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
Technology and development expense
|
|
|
5,790
|
|
|
|
5,053
|
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
Marketing and selling expense
|
|
|
4,965
|
|
|
|
4,021
|
|
|
|
3,722
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
10,785
|
|
|
|
9,654
|
|
|
|
6,162
|
|
See accompanying notes.
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
Treasury Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
|
47,972
|
|
|
$
|
672
|
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
169,400
|
|
|
$
|
4,066
|
|
|
$
|
1,922
|
|
|
$
|
176,060
|
|
Cumulative effect adjustment for accrued sabbatical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
Issuance of ordinary shares due to share option exercises
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,321
|
|
RSUs awarded, net of shares withheld for taxes
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,391
|
)
|
Tax benefits of employee share transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,012
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,831
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,209
|
|
|
|
6,209
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
|
48,779
|
|
|
$
|
683
|
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
190,632
|
|
|
$
|
43,098
|
|
|
$
|
8,092
|
|
|
$
|
242,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares due to share option exercises
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,067
|
|
RSUs awarded, net of shares withheld for taxes
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(2,818
|
)
|
|
|
(1,363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,176
|
)
|
Tax benefits of employee share transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,603
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,737
|
|
Repurchase of shares
|
|
|
(770
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1,784
|
)
|
|
|
(27,063
|
)
|
|
|
(18,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,518
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,686
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,382
|
)
|
|
|
(4,382
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
49,175
|
|
|
$
|
688
|
|
|
|
(6,369
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,881
|
)
|
|
$
|
212,221
|
|
|
$
|
98,784
|
|
|
$
|
3,722
|
|
|
$
|
285,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
62
VISTAPRINT
N.V.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(CONTINUED)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares
|
|
|
Treasury Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
49,175
|
|
|
$
|
688
|
|
|
|
(6,369
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,881
|
)
|
|
$
|
212,221
|
|
|
$
|
98,784
|
|
|
$
|
3,722
|
|
|
$
|
285,534
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares due to share option exercises
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
14,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,977
|
|
RSUs awarded, net of shares withheld for taxes
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
(5,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,142
|
)
|
Tax benefits of employee share transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,079
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,741
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,368
|
)
|
|
|
(14,368
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
49,891
|
|
|
$
|
698
|
|
|
|
(6,036
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,637
|
)
|
|
$
|
249,153
|
|
|
$
|
166,525
|
|
|
$
|
(10,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
376,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
67,741
|
|
|
$
|
55,686
|
|
|
$
|
39,831
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44,367
|
|
|
|
35,713
|
|
|
|
25,193
|
|
Abandonment of intangible assets acquired in a business
acquisition
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale, disposal, or impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Amortization of premiums and discounts on short-term investments
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
22,380
|
|
|
|
19,473
|
|
|
|
14,747
|
|
Tax benefits derived from share-based compensation awards
|
|
|
(6,272
|
)
|
|
|
(9,603
|
)
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
(4,538
|
)
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the
effect of an acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,727
|
)
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(2,224
|
)
|
|
|
(1,921
|
)
|
|
|
(1,309
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
|
|
(4,879
|
)
|
|
|
(2,173
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
6,176
|
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
19,707
|
|
|
|
24,804
|
|
|
|
13,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
153,701
|
|
|
|
120,051
|
|
|
|
87,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(101,326
|
)
|
|
|
(76,286
|
)
|
|
|
(62,740
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(6,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(9,804
|
)
|
|
|
(6,078
|
)
|
|
|
(49,487
|
)
|
Sales and maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
31,937
|
|
|
|
61,117
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,250
|
)
|
Capitalization of software and website development costs
|
|
|
(6,516
|
)
|
|
|
(7,168
|
)
|
|
|
(5,696
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(123,865
|
)
|
|
|
(57,595
|
)
|
|
|
(58,056
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(13,848
|
)
|
|
|
(3,219
|
)
|
|
|
(3,251
|
)
|
Payment of withholding taxes in connection with vesting of
restricted share units
|
|
|
(6,142
|
)
|
|
|
(4,176
|
)
|
|
|
(3,391
|
)
|
Repurchase of ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits derived from share-based compensation awards
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
9,603
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of shares
|
|
|
14,977
|
|
|
|
12,067
|
|
|
|
8,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
(31,243
|
)
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(2,356
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
28,739
|
|
|
|
30,843
|
|
|
|
33,681
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
133,988
|
|
|
|
103,145
|
|
|
|
69,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
162,727
|
|
|
$
|
133,988
|
|
|
$
|
103,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
64
VISTAPRINT
N.V.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
883
|
|
|
$
|
1,391
|
|
|
$
|
1,635
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of accounting for sabbatical leave
(see Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
See accompanying notes.
65
|
|
1.
|
Description of
the Business
|
The Vistaprint group of companies (the Company)
offers micro businesses the ability to market their businesses
with a broad range of brand identity and promotional products,
marketing services and digital solutions. Through the use of
proprietary Internet-based graphic design software, localized
websites, proprietary order receiving and processing
technologies and advanced computer integrated production
facilities, the Company offers a broad spectrum of products
ranging from business cards, website hosting, brochures and
invitations to marketing and creative services. The Company
focuses on serving the marketing, graphic design and printing
needs of the micro business market, generally businesses or
organizations with fewer than 10 employees, often fewer
than 5. The Company also provides personalized products and
services to the consumer market.
Change of
Domicile
On August 31, 2009, the Company moved the place of
incorporation of the publicly traded parent entity of the
Vistaprint group of companies from Bermuda to the Netherlands.
Vistaprint N.V. was formed as a limited liability company
(nammlooze vennootschap) under the laws of the
Netherlands and pursuant to a scheme of arrangement under
Bermuda law approved by the common shareholders of Vistaprint
Limited, among other things, each common share of Vistaprint
Limited was exchanged for one ordinary share of Vistaprint N.V.
As a result of the scheme of arrangement and the share exchange
transaction, the common shareholders of Vistaprint Limited
became ordinary shareholders of Vistaprint N.V. and Vistaprint
Limited became a wholly owned subsidiary of Vistaprint N.V. The
par value of the Companys common shares increased from
$0.001 per share to 0.01 per share (or $0.014 based on an
exchange rate in effect on August 31, 2009). In connection
with consummation of the scheme of arrangement, Vistaprint N.V.
assumed Vistaprint Limiteds existing obligations in
connection with awards granted under Vistaprint Limiteds
incentive plans and other similar employee awards. Additionally,
120,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of 0.01 per
share were authorized, of which no preferred shares are issued
or outstanding.
An independent foundation, Stichting Continuïteit
Vistaprint (the Foundation), was established to
safeguard the interests of the Company and its stakeholders and
to assist in maintaining the Companys continuity and
independence. On November 16, 2009, Vistaprint N.V. entered
into a Call Option Agreement with the Foundation pursuant to
which the Foundation may acquire a number of Vistaprint
N.V.s preferred shares up to a maximum of the total number
of Vistaprint N.V.s ordinary shares then outstanding at an
exercise price of 0.01 per share. The call option held by
the Foundation is designed to provide a protective measure
against unsolicited take-over bids for the Company or other
hostile threats through the issuance of preferred shares to the
Foundation that would give the Foundation voting and dispositive
power over up to 50% of Vistaprint N.V.s outstanding
securities. The Company has determined it is the primary
beneficiary of the Foundation and therefore has included the
Foundation in its consolidated financial statements.
The change of domicile described above (the Change of
Domicile) was accounted for as a merger between entities
under common control and as a result all historical share
information has been restated to reflect its impact. The
historical financial statements of Vistaprint Limited for
periods prior to this transaction are considered to be the
historical financial statements of Vistaprint N.V. Both the
Change of Domicile and the consolidation of the Foundation have
not had and are not expected to
66
have a material impact on how Vistaprint conducts its
day-to-day
operations, its financial position, consolidated effective tax
rate, results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles of
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Vistaprint N.V., its wholly owned subsidiaries, and those
entities in which we have a variable interest and are the
primary beneficiary. Intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its
estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable
and sales returns allowance, useful lives of property and
equipment, intangibles and internally-developed software,
valuation of acquired intangibles and goodwill, share-based
compensation, income taxes and litigation and contingencies,
among others. The Company bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to
be reasonable at the time they are made, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities. By their nature, estimates are subject
to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Cash, Cash
Equivalents and Marketable Securities
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less to be the
equivalent of cash for the purpose of balance sheet and
statement of cash flows presentation. Cash equivalents consist
of money market funds. Cash and cash equivalents restricted
under terms of the Companys facility leases and other
financing arrangements were $2,005 and $2,315 as of
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are included in
other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Marketable securities, when held, consist primarily of
investment-grade corporate bonds, U.S. government agency issues,
and certificates of deposit. The Companys marketable
securities are classified as
available-for-sale
securities and carried at fair value, with the unrealized
gains and losses reported as a separate component of accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income. The cost of securities sold
is based on the specific identification method. Interest and
dividends on securities classified as
available-for-sale
are included in interest income.
At June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company held one auction
rate security as a result of failed auctions in fiscal year 2009
and 2010. The Company has the intent and the ability to hold the
asset until the anticipated recovery period which it believes
will be more than twelve months. As such, during fiscal year
2010 and 2009 the asset which had a fair value of $660 and $760,
net of an unrealized loss of $40, has been classified as
long-term and included in other assets on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. All other marketable securities as
of June 30, 2010 had an original maturity of less than one
year.
The Company reviews its investments for
other-than-temporary
impairment whenever the fair value of an investment is less than
amortized cost and evidence indicates that an investments
carrying amount is not recoverable within a reasonable period of
time. There were no
other-than-temporary
impairments during the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and
2008.
67
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of
June 30, 2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
162,727
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
162,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
6,772
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
6,745
|
|
U.S government and agency securities
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
Certificates of Deposit
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current marketable securities
|
|
|
9,632
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
9,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal auction rate security
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term marketable securities
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
$
|
173,059
|
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
172,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of
June 30, 2009 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
133,988
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
133,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable security:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal auction rate security
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term marketable security
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable security
|
|
$
|
134,788
|
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
$
|
134,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair
value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of
derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative,
whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a
hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the
hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to
apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as
a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an
asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a
particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair
value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge
of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or
other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow
hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the
currency exchange rate exposure of a net investment in an
operation that is not denominated in U.S. dollars. Hedge
accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of
gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the
recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset
or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair
value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted
transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into
derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge
certain of its risks, even though hedge accounting does not
apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.
68
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of
derivatives designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges of
forecasted purchases is recorded in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (AOCI). The gains and losses
will be reclassified into earnings in the same period that the
hedged item affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the
change in fair value of derivatives, as well as amounts excluded
from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, if any, are
recognized directly in earnings.
Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of raw materials, and are recorded
at the lower of cost or market value using a
first-in,
first-out method.
Property, Plant
and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Additions and
improvements that substantially extend the useful life of a
particular asset are capitalized while repairs and maintenance
costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation of plant and
equipment is recorded on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of the assets.
Software and Web
Site Development Costs
The Company capitalizes eligible salaries and payroll-related
costs of employees who devote time to the development of
internal-use computer software. Capitalization begins when the
preliminary project stage is complete, management with the
relevant authority authorizes and commits to the funding of the
software project, and it is probable that the project will be
completed and the software will be used to perform the function
intended. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis
over the estimated useful life of the software, which is
generally two years. Costs associated with preliminary stage
software development, repair, maintenance or the development of
website content are expensed as incurred. Amortization expense
in connection with the development of software for internal use
in the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $6,780,
$5,762 and $4,118, respectively, resulting in accumulated
amortization of $12,205 and $12,835 at June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
Leases
The Company categorizes leases at their inception as either
operating or capital leases. Costs for operating leases that
include incentives such as payment escalations or rent
abatements are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term
of the lease. Additionally, inducements received by the Company
are treated as a reduction of our costs over the term of the
agreement. Leasehold improvements are capitalized at cost and
amortized over the shorter of their expected useful life or the
life of the lease, excluding renewal periods.
Business
Combinations
The Company assigns the value of the consideration transferred
to acquire a business to the tangible assets and identifiable
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis
of their fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company
assesses the fair value of assets, including intangible assets,
using a variety of methods and each asset is measured at fair
value from the perspective of a market participant. The method
used to estimate the fair values of intangible assets
incorporates significant assumptions regarding the estimates a
market participant would make in order to evaluate an asset,
including a market participants use of the asset and the
appropriate discount rates for a market participant. Assets
recorded from the perspective of a market participant that are
determined to not have economic use for the Company are expensed
immediately. Any excess purchase price over the fair value of
the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is
69
allocated to goodwill. Transaction costs and restructuring costs
associated with a transaction to acquire a business are expensed
as incurred.
Intangible
Assets
The Company pursues patent protection for its intellectual
property. The Company has patents and patent applications
pending with European, United States and other patent offices,
related to various systems, processes, techniques, and tools
developed by the Company for its business. All costs related to
patent applications are expensed as incurred. The costs of
purchasing patents from unrelated third parties are capitalized
and amortized over the estimated useful life of the patent. The
costs of pursuing others who are believed to infringe on the
Companys patents, as well as costs of defending the
Company against patent-infringement claims, are expensed as
incurred.
The Company records acquired intangible assets at fair value on
the date of acquisition and amortizes such assets using the
straight-line method over the expected useful life of the asset,
unless another amortization method was deemed to be more
appropriate. The Company evaluates the remaining useful life of
intangible assets on a periodic basis to determine whether
events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining
useful life. If the estimate of an intangible assets
remaining useful life is changed, the Company amortizes the
remaining carrying value of the intangible asset prospectively
over the revised remaining useful life.
Estimated future intangible asset amortization expense for the
next five fiscal years based on balances at June 30, 2010
is $843, $810, $626, $301, and $56, respectively.
Long-Lived
Assets
The Company continually evaluates whether events or
circumstances have occurred that indicate that the estimated
remaining useful life of its long-lived assets, excluding
goodwill, may warrant revision or that the carrying value of
these assets may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates the
realizability of its long-lived assets based on profitability
and cash flow expectations for the related asset. Any
write-downs are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying
amount of the assets. For the fiscal years ended June 30,
2010, 2009 and 2008 the Company recorded impairment charges on
capitalized software and website development costs of $64, $32
and $39, respectively.
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 the
Company recorded impairment charges on long-lived assets of $450
and $1,331, respectively. Of these amounts, $307 and $589 relate
to equipment purchased for a project to automate a portion of
the production workflow in the Windsor, Ontario facility that is
no longer considered viable, and are included in cost of revenue
in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The remaining charges of $143 and $742 have been included in
technology and development expense in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Goodwill
The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business
combination is allocated to goodwill. Goodwill is evaluated for
impairment on an annual basis during the fiscal third quarter,
or earlier if impairment indicators are present. As of
June 30, 2010, goodwill of $4,168 related to the
acquisition of Soft Sight (Item 8 of Part II,
Financial Statements and Supplementary
DataNote 5Acquisition of Soft Sight,
Inc.) was included in other assets on the accompanying
balance sheet. The Companys annual impairment test
concluded that there is no impairment of goodwill, and there
have been no indications of impairment that would require an
updated analysis as of June 30, 2010.
70
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments
Carrying amounts of financial instruments held by the Company,
which include cash equivalents, marketable securities,
derivative instruments, accounts receivable, accounts payable,
debt and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the
short period of time to maturity of those instruments.
The Company uses a three-level valuation hierarchy for measuring
fair value and expands financial statement disclosures about
fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon
the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or
liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are
defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are
quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities
in active markets.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the financial instrument.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are
unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
|
A financial instruments categorization within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company generates revenue primarily from the sale and
shipping of customized manufactured products, as well as
providing electronic services, website design and hosting, email
marketing services and order referral fees. The Company
recognizes revenue arising from sales of products and services
when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company
considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when it has
persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been
shipped or service rendered with no significant post-delivery
obligations on the Companys part, the net sales price is
fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.
For subscription services the Company recognizes revenue for the
fees charged to customers ratably over the term of the service
arrangement. Revenue is recognized net of discounts the Company
offers to its customers as part of advertising campaigns. A
reserve for sales returns and allowances is recorded based on
historical experience or specific identification of an event
necessitating a reserve.
Shipping, handling and processing costs billed to customers are
included in revenue and the related costs are included in cost
of revenue. Sales and purchases in jurisdictions which are
subject to indirect taxes, such as value added tax
(VAT), are recorded net of tax collected and paid as
the Company acts as an agent for the government.
Advertising
Expense
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising
expense for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008
was $135,675, $95,378 and $73,699, respectively, and is included
in marketing and selling expense.
Research and
Development Expense
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Research and development expense for the years ended
June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $8,501, $7,069 and $6,144,
respectively and is included in technology and development
expense.
71
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a
business enterprise during a period from transactions and other
events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive
income is composed of net income, unrealized gains and losses on
marketable securities and derivatives, and cumulative foreign
currency translation adjustments, which are disclosed in the
accompanying consolidated statements of shareholders
equity and comprehensive income.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
$
|
(10,606)
|
|
|
$
|
3,762
|
|
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge, net of tax of $22
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities
|
|
|
(68)
|
|
|
|
(40)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(10,625)
|
|
|
$
|
3,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
The Company makes estimates and judgments in determining income
tax expense, and in the calculation of tax assets and
liabilities. The Companys corporate tax rate is a
combination of the tax rates of the jurisdictions where it
conducts business.
Deferred income taxes are determined using the liability method.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based
on the differences between the financial statement carrying
values and the tax bases and are measured by applying currently
enacted tax rates and laws to taxable years in which such
differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a
valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount
that is believed more likely than not to be realized. The
Company regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for
recoverability and estimates a valuation allowance based on
historical taxable income, projected future taxable income and
the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary
differences. Judgment is required to determine, among other
things, whether an increase or decrease of a valuation allowance
is warranted. The Company will increase the valuation allowance
if it operates at a loss or is unable to generate sufficient
future taxable income. Any changes in the valuation allowance
could affect the Companys tax expense, financial position
and results of operations.
The Company recognizes, presents and discloses in its financial
statements uncertain tax positions it has taken, or expects to
take on a tax return, whereby the Company recognizes the tax
benefit from an uncertain tax position if it is more likely than
not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by
the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial
statements from such positions are then measured based on the
largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. The unrecognized tax benefits
will reduce the Companys effective tax rate when
recognized. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits are recorded in the provision for income taxes.
The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment
in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of
GAAP and complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in
a manner inconsistent with the Companys expectations could
have a material impact on the Companys financial condition
and operating results.
72
Foreign Currency
Translation
The Companys Dutch, Spanish, French, German and Tunisian
subsidiaries have the euro as their functional currency, the
Swiss subsidiary has the Swiss franc as its functional currency,
the Australia subsidiary has the Australian dollar as its
functional currency and Vistaprint N.V. and all other
consolidated entities have the U.S. dollar as their
functional currency.
Non-U.S. dollar
functional currency subsidiaries translate their assets and
liabilities denominated in their functional currency at current
rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date, and
revenues and expenses are translated at rates prevailing on the
day of the transaction. The resulting gains and losses from
translation are included as a component of other comprehensive
income. Transaction gains and losses and re-measurement of
assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than an
entities functional currency are included in other (expense)
income, net. Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains
included in other (expense) income, net for the years ended
June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $(1,491), $(803) and
$427, respectively.
Treasury
Shares
Treasury shares are accounted for under the cost method and
included as a component of shareholders equity. Treasury
shares are used to fulfill certain share option exercises and
restricted share unit vesting, and may in the future be used for
acquisitions.
Net Income Per
Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for
the fiscal period. Diluted net income per share gives effect to
all potentially dilutive securities, including share options and
restricted share units (RSUs) using the treasury
stock method. Ordinary share equivalents of 259,398, 2,096,825
and 864,968 were excluded from the determination of potentially
dilutive shares for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and
2008, respectively, due to their anti-dilutive effect.
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the
weighted-average number of ordinary shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
43,365,872
|
|
|
|
43,330,166
|
|
|
|
43,913,119
|
|
Weighted average shares issuable upon exercise/vesting of
outstanding share options/RSUs
|
|
|
1,970,689
|
|
|
|
1,304,025
|
|
|
|
2,103,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share
|
|
|
45,336,561
|
|
|
|
44,634,191
|
|
|
|
46,016,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-Based
Compensation
At June 30, 2010, the Company had three share-based
compensation plans (see Part II, Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Note 8 Shareholders Equity). The
Company grants share options for a fixed number of shares to
employees and certain other individuals with exercise prices as
determined by the Supervisory Board or Management Board on the
date of grant. For all share option grants in fiscal years 2010
and prior, the exercise price has been equal to the closing
price on the date of grant. For all restricted share unit grants
in fiscal years 2010 and prior, the grant date fair value has
been equal to the closing price on the date of grant.
The Company recorded share-based compensation costs of $22,380,
$19,473 and $14,747 for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively. Share-based compensation costs
73
capitalized as part of software and website development costs
were $530, $994 and $697 for the years ended June 30, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
At June 30, 2010, there was $36,400 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested, share-based
compensation arrangements, net of estimated forfeitures. This
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 2.3 years.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For option
awards in fiscal year 2010 and 2009, expected volatility is
based upon historical volatility of the Company. For years prior
to fiscal 2009, expected volatilities were based upon historical
volatilities of guideline companies since the Company did not
have sufficient history as a publicly traded company. The
expected life of options granted represents the period of time
that options granted are expected to be outstanding. For option
awards in fiscal year 2010 and 2009, the Company used its
historical experience to estimate the expected life of options
granted. For years prior to fiscal 2009, expected lives used by
guideline companies were used to estimate the expected life of
options granted. The Company uses historical data to estimate
employee terminations and resulting forfeiture rates within the
option pricing model. The risk-free interest rate for periods
within the contractual life of the option is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the
grant. The fair value of restricted share grants is based upon
the closing trading value of the Companys shares on the
date of grant and recognized using the straight-line recognition
method. Weighted-average assumptions used for option grants in
2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.03%
|
|
|
1.48%
|
|
|
|
3.75%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
4.92
|
|
|
3.94
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
57%
|
|
|
58%
|
|
|
|
52%
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
|
|
$
|
24.34
|
|
$
|
14.06
|
|
|
$
|
15.82
|
|
Weighted average fair value of restricted share units granted
|
|
$
|
51.06
|
|
$
|
28.37
|
|
|
$
|
33.22
|
|
As part of the financial reporting process for the second
quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company became aware that the widely
used third-party software application it used to calculate
share-based compensation costs contained computational errors
that affected the timing of expense recognition. These errors
were corrected in the most current software version that the
Company had not implemented during the affected periods.
Specifically, the software incorrectly applied a weighted
average forfeiture rate to the vested portion of stock option
and restricted share awards until the grants final vest
date, rather than reflecting actual forfeitures as awards vest,
resulting in a cumulative understatement of share-based
compensation expense and additional paid in capital in prior
years of $1,277. The Company assessed the materiality of this
error on its financial statements and concluded that the effect
of this cumulative error was not material to its interim or
annual financial statements for any period. Accordingly, the
Company recorded a non-cash charge to share-based compensation
and additional paid in capital of $1,277 to correct this error
in its second fiscal quarter. The Company has since implemented
the most current software version and the computational errors
have therefore been rectified.
Sabbatical
Leave
Compensation expense associated with a sabbatical leave, or
other similar benefit arrangements, is accrued over the
requisite service period during which an employee earns the
benefit and is included in other liabilities on the
Companys consolidated balance sheets.
74
Concentrations of
Credit Risk
The Company monitors the creditworthiness of its customers to
which it grants credit terms in the normal course of business.
As of June 30, 2010 the Company had one customer that
represented more than 10% of total receivables. The individual
customer accounted for 11% of the Companys total accounts
receivable at June 30, 2010.
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for
potential credit losses based upon specific customer accounts
and historical trends, and such losses to date in the aggregate
have not materially exceeded the Companys expectations.
Recently Adopted
Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Boards
(FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) became effective for the Company at the
beginning of fiscal 2010. The Codification brings together in
one place all authoritative GAAP and substantially retains
existing GAAP. This change did not affect the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the revisions
to FASB ASC Topic 805 Business Combinations that requires
all assets and liabilities of an acquired business to be
recorded at their fair values in all business combinations
(whether full, partial or step acquisitions). Certain forms of
contingent consideration and certain acquired contingencies are
also required to be recorded at fair value at the acquisition
date. Acquisition costs are now expensed as incurred and
restructuring costs will be expensed in periods after the
acquisition date in accordance with the Companys existing
accounting policy for restructuring costs. Finally,
post-acquisition changes in deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties are recognized
as income tax expense or benefit. The acquisition of Soft Sight
during the period was accounted for under the new requirements.
Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the revisions
to FASB ASC Topic 810 Consolidation that requires the
Company to clearly identify and present ownership interests in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the company in the
consolidated financial statements within the equity section but
separate from the companys equity. The amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
non-controlling interest is required to be clearly identified
and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of
income; changes in ownership interest be accounted for
similarly, as equity transactions. When a subsidiary is
deconsolidated, any retained non-controlling equity investment
in the former subsidiary and the gain or loss on the
deconsolidation of the subsidiary is to be measured at fair
value. The revisions also require the Company to revise
evaluations of whether entities represent variable interest
entities, ongoing assessments of control over such entities, and
additional disclosures for variable interests. The adoption of
these requirements did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the updated
provisions issued by the FASB for earnings per share. The new
guidance provides that unvested share-based payment awards that
contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend
equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating
securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings
per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method
determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and
participating security according to their respective
participation rights in undistributed earnings. The adoption of
these requirements did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
2009-05,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820)Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value allows
entities determining the fair value of a liability to use the
perspective of an investor that holds the related obligation as
an asset. The ASU is
75
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
August 27, 2009, and applies to all fair-value
measurements of liabilities required by GAAP. Additionally,
effective January 1, 2010, we adopted ASU
2010-06
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,
which requires additional disclosures regarding assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. The adoption of these
requirements did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-09,
which amends the Subsequent Events Topic of the ASC to eliminate
the requirement for public companies to disclose the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The Company
will continue to evaluate subsequent events through the date of
the issuance of the financial statements; however, consistent
with the guidance, this date will no longer be disclosed. This
change did not affect the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Recently Issued
Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2009-13
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements amends ASC
Subtopic
650-25
Revenue RecognitionMultiple-Element Arrangements to
eliminate the requirement that all undelivered elements have
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) or
third-party evidence (TPE) before an entity can
recognize the portion of an overall arrangement fee that is
attributable to items that already have been delivered. In the
absence of VSOE or TPE of the standalone selling price for one
or more delivered or undelivered elements in a multiple-element
arrangement, entities will be required to estimate the selling
prices of those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be
allocated to each element (both delivered and undelivered items)
based on their relative selling prices, regardless of whether
those selling prices are evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based
on the entitys estimated selling price. Additionally, the
new guidance will require entities to disclose more information
about their multiple-element revenue arrangements. This ASU is
effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. The Company
does not believe that the adoption of this ASU will have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2009-14
Certain Revenue Arrangements that Include Software Elements
amends ASC Subtopic
985-605
Software-Revenue Recognition, which addresses the
accounting for revenue transactions involving software, to
exclude from its scope tangible products that contain both
software and non-software components that function together to
deliver a products essential functionality. The ASU is
effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. The Company
does not believe that the adoption of this ASU will have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
76
|
|
3.
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
The following table summarizes, by major security type, our
assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and
are categorized using the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
162,727
|
|
|
$
|
162,727
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
6,745
|
|
|
|
6,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S government and agency securities
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments (1)
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets recorded at fair value
|
|
$
|
172,991
|
|
|
$
|
172,331
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
133,988
|
|
|
$
|
133,988
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term investments (1)
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets recorded at fair value
|
|
$
|
134,748
|
|
|
$
|
133,988
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long-term investments consist of an auction rate security. |
The Company has the intent and the ability to hold the
Level 3 asset until the anticipated recovery period which
it believes will be more than twelve months. The following table
presents a roll forward of assets measured at fair value using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at
June 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
Maturities or redemptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
Maturities or redemptions
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow
Hedge of Currency Exchange Risk
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in various currencies
against its reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. During the
fiscal year 2010, the Companys Canadian subsidiary entered
into a series of nine currency forward contracts with the
objective of hedging currency exchange risk on forecasted
monthly payments for the purchase of a long-lived asset
denominated in a currency other than its functional currency and
were designated and qualify as cash flow hedges at inception.
77
The currency forward contracts settled during fiscal 2010,
resulting in a gain of $49 as of June 30, 2010. The cash
flow hedge was considered to be highly effective and all of the
gain was recorded within AOCI on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
at June 30, 2010. The net gain recorded within AOCI will be
reclassified into net income over the useful life of the
long-lived asset as a reduction in depreciation expense. No
amounts have been reclassified into earnings during the year
ended June 30, 2010 as the long-lived asset has not been
placed in service. Reclassifications into depreciation expense
in the future will not be material. The Company has no
derivative contracts outstanding at June 30, 2010.
|
|
4.
|
Property, Plant
and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Estimated useful lives
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Land improvements
|
|
10 years
|
|
$
|
1,172
|
|
|
$
|
1,117
|
|
Building and building improvements
|
|
10 - 30 years
|
|
|
82,619
|
|
|
|
61,024
|
|
Machinery and production equipment
|
|
4 - 10 years
|
|
|
143,338
|
|
|
|
116,168
|
|
Computer software and equipment
|
|
3 - 5 years
|
|
|
48,689
|
|
|
|
31,221
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
5 - 7 years
|
|
|
9,353
|
|
|
|
7,731
|
|
|
|
Shorter of lease term or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
remaining life of the asset
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
3,447
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
37,910
|
|
|
|
27,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,744
|
|
|
|
248,362
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
(96,945
|
)
|
|
|
(66,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,799
|
|
|
|
182,013
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
19,162
|
|
|
|
11,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
$
|
249,961
|
|
|
$
|
193,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 and 2009 construction in progress
consisted mainly of expansion of the Canadian, Dutch, and
Jamaican facilities, the purchase of production equipment for
the Companys production facilities and the purchase of
information technology related assets. Depreciation expense
totaled $37,199, $29,236 and $20,348 for the years ended
June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
5.
|
Acquisition of
Soft Sight, Inc.
|
On December 30, 2009, the Company acquired 100% of the
outstanding equity of Soft Sight, a privately held developer of
embroidery digitization software based in the United States, for
$6,500 in cash. Soft Sights proprietary software enables a
customers uploaded graphic artwork to be automatically
converted into embroidery stitch patterns for subsequent
manufacturing.
The transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method
of accounting. All of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in the transaction are recognized at their
acquisition-date fair values, while transaction costs and
restructuring costs associated with the transaction are expensed
as incurred. The transaction and restructuring costs did not
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
results of operations or cash flows. The Company plans to launch
a line of embroidered products to customers in fiscal 2011. Pro
forma results of operations for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 assuming the acquisition of Soft
Sight had taken place at the beginning of each period would not
differ significantly from the Companys actual reported
results.
78
Allocations of
Assets and Liabilities
The Company allocated the purchase price for Soft Sight to net
tangible assets of $52, deferred tax assets of $691, intangible
assets of $2,647, goodwill of $4,168 and a deferred tax
liability of $1,059. The fair values of the acquired intangible
assets were measured from the perspective of a market
participant. Of the $2,647 of acquired intangible assets, $920
was immediately expensed as it will not be used by the Company
and does not have economic value for the Company. The carrying
value of the remaining intangible assets relate to developed
embroidery technology and customer lists, which will be
amortized over a weighted average life of approximately
3.8 years.
The deferred tax assets primarily relate to net operating loss
carryforwards that will be able to be utilized to reduce future
tax liabilities. The deferred tax liability primarily relates to
the tax impact of future amortization or impairments associated
with the identified intangible assets acquired, which are not
deductible for tax purposes.
The difference between the consideration transferred to acquire
the business and the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. This goodwill
relates to the potential synergies from the integration of the
Soft Sight embroidery software capabilities into the existing
Vistaprint product offering. The Company does not expect the
goodwill to be deductible for income tax purposes.
The Companys long-term debt is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Amended Canadian credit agreement
|
|
$
|
5,222
|
|
|
$
|
6,556
|
|
Original Canadian credit agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,380
|
|
Euro revolving credit agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
5,222
|
|
|
$
|
18,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2005, the Company amended its original Canadian
credit agreement to include an additional $10,000 equipment term
loan. The borrowings were used to finance printing equipment
purchases for the Windsor production facility. The remaining
obligation under the Companys amended Canadian credit
agreement is payable in monthly installments of $111 with the
remaining balance of $4,667 to be paid during December 2010. As
of June 30, 2010, the interest rates on the amended
Canadian credit agreement range from 7.82% to 8.50% and the
balance is classified as current.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the remaining balance
of the euro revolving credit agreement and the final balloon
payment on the original Canadian credit agreement were paid in
the amounts of $6,064 and $5,960, respectively.
The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants at
June 30, 2010.
79
Accrued expenses included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Advertising costs
|
|
$
|
17,627
|
|
|
$
|
14,726
|
|
Compensation costs
|
|
|
16,263
|
|
|
|
10,724
|
|
Income and indirect taxes
|
|
|
12,403
|
|
|
|
7,253
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
7,129
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
Professional costs
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
2,255
|
|
Shipping costs
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,361
|
|
|
|
6,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
65,609
|
|
|
$
|
43,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys
2000-2002 Share
Incentive Plan (the
2000-2002
Plan) provided for employees, officers, non-employee
directors, consultants and advisors to receive restricted share
awards or be granted options to purchase the Companys
ordinary shares. Under the
2000-2002
Plan, the Company reserved an aggregate of 9,000,000 ordinary
shares for such awards. The Board of Directors of Vistaprint
Limited determined that no further grants of awards under the
2000-2002
Plan would be made after the Companys Initial Public
Offering (IPO) in 2005. As of June 30, 2010,
there were options to purchase 1,265,346 ordinary shares
outstanding under the
2000-2002
Plan. Upon the IPO, all shares reserved for issuance but not yet
granted under the
2000-2002
Plan were transferred to the Companys Amended and Restated
2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan) and 2005
Non-Employee Directors Share Option Plan (the
Directors Plan). Options previously granted to
U.S. tax residents under the
2000-2002
Plan were either incentive stock options or
nonstatutory options under the applicable provisions
of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
The 2005 Plan provides for employees, officers, non-employee
directors, consultants and advisors of the Company to receive
restricted share awards or other share-based awards or options
to purchase ordinary shares. Among other terms, the 2005 Plan
requires that the exercise price of any share option or share
appreciation right granted under the 2005 Plan be at least 100%
of the fair market value of the ordinary shares on the date of
grant; limits the term of any share option or share appreciation
right to a maximum period of ten years; provides that shares
underlying outstanding awards under the
2000-2002
Plan that are cancelled, forfeited, expired or otherwise
terminated without having been exercised in full will no longer
become available for the grant of new awards under the 2005
Plan; and prohibits the repricing of any share options or share
appreciation rights without shareholder approval. In addition,
the 2005 Plan provides that the number of ordinary shares
available for issuance under the Plan will be reduced by
(i) 1.56 ordinary shares for each share subject to any
restricted share award, restricted share unit or other
share-based award with a per share or per unit purchase price
lower than 100% of the fair market value of the ordinary shares
on the date of grant and (ii) one ordinary share for each
share subject to any other award under the 2005 Plan. As of
June 30, 2010, there were awards to purchase or acquire
2,338,226 ordinary shares outstanding under the 2005 Plan, and
1,819,079 ordinary shares remained available for issuance under
the 2005 Plan.
The Directors Plan provides for non-employee directors of
the Company to receive option grants upon initial appointment as
a director and annually thereafter in connection with the
Companys annual general meeting of shareholders if they
are continuing to serve as a director at such time. Under the
Directors Plan, the Company reserved 250,000 shares
for such awards. As of June 30, 2010, there were 103,728
options outstanding under the Directors Plan and
146,272 shares available for future grant under the
Directors Plan.
80
While the Company may grant options to employees, officers,
non-employee directors, consultants and advisors which become
exercisable at different times or within different periods, the
Company has generally granted options to employees, officers,
consultants and advisors that are exercisable on a cumulative
basis, with 25% exercisable on the first anniversary of the date
of grant, and 6.25% quarterly thereafter. In addition, the
Company has generally granted awards to non-employee directors
that are exercisable on a cumulative basis, with 8.33%
exercisable each quarter. Given these vesting rates, the
requisite service period to achieve 100% vesting is normally
four years for employees and officers and three years for
non-employee directors. The contractual life of the options is
ten years.
The Company has issued a combination of new shares and treasury
shares in fulfillment of option exercises and restricted share
award vests for periods through June 30, 2010.
A summary of the Companys share option activity and
related information for the year ended June 30, 2010 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term (years)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
3,521,636
|
|
|
$
|
20.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
136,004
|
|
|
$
|
48.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(783,085)
|
|
|
$
|
19.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(16,055 )
|
|
|
$
|
34.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of the period
|
|
|
2,858,500
|
|
|
$
|
22.03
|
|
|
|
6.09
|
|
$
|
72,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at the end of the period
|
|
|
2,817,501
|
|
|
$
|
21.78
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
$
|
72,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of the period
|
|
|
2,239,000
|
|
|
$
|
18.09
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
|
$
|
65,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intrinsic value in the table above represents the total
pre-tax amount, net of exercise price, which would have been
received by option holders if all option holders had exercised
all options with an exercise price lower than the market price
on June 30, 2010.
A summary of the Companys unvested restricted share unit
activity and related information for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Share Units
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unvested at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
991,106
|
|
|
$
|
30.77
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
319,507
|
|
|
|
51.06
|
|
Vested and distributed
|
|
|
(388,292
|
)
|
|
|
31.44
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(73,521
|
)
|
|
|
33.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at the end of the period
|
|
|
848,800
|
|
|
$
|
38.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had an aggregate of 1,965,351 ordinary shares
available for future awards under all of its share-based
compensation plans as of June 30, 2010.
The total fair value of shares vested during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $19,456, $12,589,
and $9,813, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2009
and 2008 was $26,667, $15,203, and $16,870, respectively.
81
|
|
9.
|
Employees
Savings Plan
|
The Company maintains certain government mandated and defined
contribution plans throughout the world. The most significant is
the Companys defined contribution retirement plan in the
U.S. (the Plan) that complies with
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Substantially
all employees in the U.S. are eligible to participate in
the Plan. Under the provisions of the Plan, employees may
voluntarily contribute up to 15% of eligible compensation,
subject to IRS limitations. The Company matches 50% of each
participants voluntary contributions, subject to a maximum
Company contribution of 3% of the participants eligible
compensation. Employee contributions are fully vested when
contributed. Company matching contributions vest over four
years. The Company contributed and expensed $1,547, $1,258 and
$988 for the Plan in the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively. Contributions under the Companys
remaining global plans were not material in the years ended
June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
On August 31, 2009 Vistaprint N.V., a Dutch limited
liability company, became the parent company of the Vistaprint
group of companies. The Dutch Revenue Authority granted the
Company an Advanced Tax Ruling, which enabled the Company to
conclude that the reincorporation to the Netherlands would not
have an adverse impact to its effective tax rate. Vistaprint
Limited, the former parent company and current subsidiary of
Vistaprint N.V., is a Bermuda based company. The Company has
entered into and operates pursuant to transfer pricing
agreements that establish the transfer prices for transactions
between Vistaprint Limited and the Companys subsidiaries
in Canada, France, the Netherlands, Jamaica, Spain, Switzerland,
Tunisia, Germany, Australia, Japan and the United States. The
determination of appropriate transfer prices requires the
Company to apply judgment. The Company believes that its
transfer pricing is in accordance with advanced tax rulings and
applicable statutory regulations.
The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$
|
5,607
|
|
|
$
|
4,766
|
|
|
$
|
4,544
|
|
U.S. State
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
2,234
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
3,062
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
9,503
|
|
|
|
10,062
|
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
|
(1,797
|
)
|
|
|
(2,344
|
)
|
|
|
(2,099
|
)
|
U.S. State
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
|
|
(688
|
)
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,012
|
)
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,230
|
)
|
|
|
(4,645
|
)
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,273
|
|
|
$
|
5,417
|
|
|
$
|
4,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
The following is a reconciliation of the standard
U.S. statutory tax rate and the Companys effective
tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
State taxes, net of federal effect
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Foreign rate differential
|
|
|
(26.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(23.9
|
)%
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Companys income before
taxes by geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
10,250
|
|
|
$
|
9,402
|
|
|
$
|
8,068
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
64,764
|
|
|
|
51,701
|
|
|
|
36,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
75,014
|
|
|
$
|
61,103
|
|
|
$
|
44,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of the Companys deferred income tax
assets and liabilities consist of the following at June 30,
2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
3,312
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
Shared-based compensation
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
Corporate minimum tax
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
R&D credit carryforwards
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
11,738
|
|
|
|
9,121
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
10,794
|
|
|
|
9,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(5,401
|
)
|
|
|
(3,099
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(5,423
|
)
|
|
|
(3,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
5,371
|
|
|
$
|
6,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current portion of the net deferred taxes at June 30,
2010 and 2009 was an asset of $1,245 and $624, respectively,
which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the
Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
No valuation allowance has been recorded against the $5,923
deferred tax asset associated with share-based compensation
charges at June 30, 2010. However, in the future, if the
underlying awards expire, are
83
released or exercised with an intrinsic value less than the fair
value of the awards on the date of grant, some or all of the
benefit may not be realizable. The Company has recorded a
valuation allowance of $944 during the year associated with
certain foreign net operating losses for which management has
determined it is more likely than not that the carryforward will
not be utilized in the foreseeable future. Based on the weight
of available evidence at June 30, 2010, management believes
that it is more likely than not that all other net deferred tax
assets will be realized. The Company will continue to assess the
realization of the deferred tax assets based on operating
results.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had U.S. federal and
state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,946
that expire on dates up to and through the year 2029. The
utilization of federal net operating losses is partially subject
to annual limitation under the change in share ownership rules
of Internal Revenue Code Section 382. The Company had
foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $8,127
that expire on dates up to and through 2028 and $2,457 that will
never expire. The benefits of these carryforwards are dependent
upon the generation of taxable income in the jurisdictions where
they arose. In addition, the Company has approximately $747 of
federal net operating loss, $8,634 of state net operating loss
and $1,594 of federal R&D tax credit carryforwards as a
result of excess tax deductions related to stock-based
compensation. The Company will realize the benefit of these
excess tax deductions through increases to shareholders
equity in the periods in which these carryforward losses are
utilized to reduce tax payments.
The Company has corporate minimum tax credit carryforwards and
research and development tax credits in Canada of approximately
$167 and $330, respectively that expire at various dates through
2030.
Undistributed earnings of the Companys subsidiaries are
considered to be indefinitely reinvested. Upon repatriation of
those earnings, in the form of dividends or otherwise, the
Company would be subject to withholding taxes payable.
Determination of the amount of unrecognized tax liability
associated with withholding taxes is not practicable due to the
complexities associated with this hypothetical calculation.
As of the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the
effective tax rate is $2,085 and $1,372, respectively. The
Company recognizes interest and, if applicable, penalties
related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The
accrued interest and penalties for the years ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 were $242 and $75, respectively.
A reconciliation of the gross beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current tax year
|
|
|
363
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to prior tax years
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,477
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current tax year
|
|
|
290
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to prior tax years
|
|
|
585
|
|
Statute of limitation expirations
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys U.S. subsidiary is under audit by the
Internal Revenue Service and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Also, the Canada Revenue Agency is auditing one of the
Companys Canadian subsidiaries. In addition, certain
statutes of limitations are scheduled to expire in the near
future. It is reasonably possible that a further change in the
unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve
months as a result of the settlement of one or more of these
audits or the
84
lapse of applicable statutes of limitations. However, an
estimated range of the impact on the unrecognized tax benefits
cannot be quantified at this time.
The Company is required to file income tax returns in the
U.S. federal jurisdiction, the state of Massachusetts and
multiple jurisdictions outside of the U.S. The
Companys U.S. federal tax returns for 2007 and
subsequent years and the state tax returns for 2005 and
subsequent years remain open to examination by the tax
authorities. Generally, the years 2004 through 2009 remain open
for examination by the tax authorities in the
non-U.S. tax
jurisdictions in which the Company operates.
Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise
for which separate discrete financial information is available
for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or
decision-making group, in making decisions on how to allocate
resources and assess performance. The Companys chief
operating decision maker is considered to be the chief executive
officer. The Company currently views its operations and manages
its business as one operating segment.
The Company is in the process of reorganizing the business into
operating segments on a geographical basis; however, separate
discrete financial information is not yet available to be used
by the chief operating decision maker to make decisions on how
to allocate resources and assess performance at such a level. As
a result, there has been no change in the Companys
identification of operating segments as of June 30, 2010
and through the date the financial statements were issued. The
Company expects that this change will take place during the
current calendar year.
Geographic
Data
Revenues by geography are based on the country-specific website
through which the customers order was transacted. The
following table sets forth revenues and long-lived assets by
geographic area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
370,137
|
|
|
$
|
313,621
|
|
|
$
|
249,017
|
|
Non-United
States
|
|
|
299,898
|
|
|
|
202,205
|
|
|
|
151,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
670,035
|
|
|
$
|
515,826
|
|
|
$
|
400,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Long-lived assets (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
$
|
110,780
|
|
|
$
|
86,541
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
73,992
|
|
|
|
85,230
|
|
Australia (2)
|
|
|
36,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
|
17,152
|
|
|
|
17,880
|
|
United States
|
|
|
12,879
|
|
|
|
9,489
|
|
Jamaica
|
|
|
6,191
|
|
|
|
3,108
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
1,733
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
263,441
|
|
|
$
|
205,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes deferred tax assets of $7,277 and $7,035, respectively,
and goodwill of $4,169 and $0, respectively. |
(2) |
|
The increase in long-lived assets in Australia is principally a
result of the construction of a new production facility to serve
our customers in the Asia Pacific region, which commenced and
was completed during fiscal 2010. |
|
|
12.
|
Commitments and
Contingencies
|
Operating Lease
Commitments
The Company is committed under operating leases for facilities
expiring on various dates through 2018. Total lease expense for
the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $7,395,
$6,331 and $5,347, respectively.
Future minimum rental payments required under operating leases
for the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows at
June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
7,170
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,948
|
|
2013
|
|
|
6,580
|
|
2014
|
|
|
6,526
|
|
2015
|
|
|
6,661
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
12,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with Vistaprint USA, Incorporateds lease for
approximately 202,000 square feet of office space in
Lexington, Massachusetts, the lease requires a security deposit
in the form of a letter of credit in the amount of $728. The
letter of credit is cash collateralized on a
dollar-for-dollar
basis, which is classified as restricted cash and is included in
other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. In addition, the
Company provided a customary indemnification to the lessor for
certain claims that may arise under the lease. A maximum
obligation is not explicitly stated, thus the potential amount
of future maximum payments that might arise under this
indemnification obligation cannot be reasonably estimated. The
Company has not experienced any prior claims against similar
lease indemnifications in the past and management has determined
that the associated fair value of the liability is not material.
As such, the Company has not recorded any liability for this
indemnity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The Company carries specific and general liability insurance
policies, which the Company believes would provide, in most
cases, some, if not total, recourse to any claims arising from
this lease indemnification provision.
Other
Obligations
In June 2009, the Company entered into a $1,100 Standby Letter
of Credit (the Letter of Credit) with JPMorgan. The
Letter of Credit was obtained in compliance with the
Companys agreement with a vendor, the beneficiary of the
Letter of Credit, which provides payment processing services.
The Letter of Credit expires on August 23, 2013.
The Company has also entered into arrangements with financial
institutions and vendors to provide guarantees for the
obligations of the Companys subsidiaries under banking
arrangements and purchase contracts. The guarantees vary in
length of time but, in general, guarantee the financial
obligations of the subsidiaries under such arrangements. The
financial obligations of the Companys subsidiaries under
such arrangements are reflected in the Companys
consolidated financial statements and these notes.
86
The Company enters into agreements in the ordinary course of
business with, among others, vendors, lessors, financial
institutions, service providers, distributors and certain
marketing customers, pursuant to which it has agreed to
indemnify the other party for certain matters, such as property
damage, personal injury, acts or omissions of the Company, its
employees, agents or representatives, or third party claims
alleging that the Companys intellectual property infringes
a patent, trademark or copyright.
In accordance with their respective charter and by-laws and with
various indemnification agreements with specific employees, the
Company and its subsidiaries have agreed to indemnify the
directors, executive officers and employees of the Company and
its subsidiaries, to the extent legally permissible, against all
liabilities reasonably incurred in connection with any action in
which the individual may be involved by reason of such
individual being or having been a director, officer or employee.
Based upon the Companys historical experience and
information known to the Company as of June 30, 2010, the
Company believes its liability with respect to the above
guarantees and indemnities at June 30, 2010 is immaterial.
Purchase
Commitments
At June 30, 2010, the Company had unrecorded commitments
under contracts to expand its Canadian production facility of
approximately $1,353, and commitments under contract for site
development and construction of its Jamaican customer support
and design center of approximately $2,883. The Company also had
unrecorded commitments under contracts at June 30, 2010 to
purchase production equipment for its Dutch and Australian
production facilities of approximately $1,269 and $278,
respectively.
Legal
Proceedings
On July 27, 2006, Vistaprint Technologies Limited, an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Vistaprint N.V., filed a
patent infringement lawsuit against print24 GmbH,
unitedprint.com AG and their two managing directors in the
District Court in Düsseldorf Germany, alleging infringement
by the defendants in Germany of one of Vistaprint Technologies
Limiteds European patents related to computer-implemented
methods and apparatus for generating pre-press graphic files. On
June 7, 2007, unitedprint.com AG filed a patent
nullification action in the German Patent Court in relation to
the same European patent at issue in Vistaprint Technologies
Limiteds infringement lawsuit against print24 and its
co-defendants. On July 31, 2007, the District Court in
Düsseldorf ruled in Vistaprint Technologies Limiteds
favor on the underlying infringement claim against print24 and
its co-defendants, granting all elements of the requested
injunction and ordering the defendants to pay damages for past
infringement. The Düsseldorf District Courts ruling
went into effect in early September 2007 and was not appealed by
the defendants. On November 13, 2008, the German Patent
Court held an oral hearing on the patent nullification action
brought by unitedprint.com and revoked the patent at issue. The
Patent Court issued a written opinion stating the basis for its
ruling on March 24, 2009, and on April 22, 2009,
Vistaprint Technologies Limited filed a notice of appeal of the
Patent Courts ruling with the German Federal Supreme
Court. The Company is unable to express an opinion as to the
likely outcome of such appeal.
On May 14, 2007, Vistaprint Technologies Limited filed a
patent infringement lawsuit against 123Print, Inc. and Drawing
Board (US), Inc., subsidiaries of Taylor Corporation, in the
United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The
complaint in the lawsuit asserts that the defendants have
infringed and continue to infringe three U.S. patents owned
by Vistaprint Technologies Limited related to browser-based
tools for online product design. The complaint seeks an
injunction against the defendants and the recovery of damages.
The defendants filed their Answer and Counterclaims to the
complaint on June 7, 2007, in which they denied the
infringement allegations and asserted counterclaims for
declaratory judgment of invalidity, unenforceability and
non-infringement of the
87
patents-in-suit.
In August 2007, another Taylor Corporation subsidiary, Taylor
Strategic Accounts, Inc., was added as an additional defendant
in the case. The exchange of relevant documents and records and
the depositions of fact witnesses in connection with the
allegations of the parties have been substantially completed. In
early June 2008, newly discovered third party prior art
documents were introduced into the litigation. These documents
had not been reviewed and considered by the U.S. Patent
Office prior to issuance of the
patents-in-suit.
For that reason, on June 30, 2008, Vistaprint Technologies
Limited requested the United States District Court to stay the
litigation to provide the U.S. Patent Office an opportunity
to reexamine the
patents-in-suit
in light of these newly discovered documents, and the Court
granted Vistaprint Technologies Limiteds request for a
stay on September 2, 2008. Vistaprint Technologies Limited
then submitted a request for reexamination of each of the
patents-in-suit
to the U.S. Patent Office, which granted the reexamination
requests in February 2009. Pursuant to the Courts order,
the stay will remain in place pending the resolution of the
requests for reexamination. On October 28, 2008, a St.
Paul, Minnesota law firm representing Taylor Corporation also
filed requests with the U.S. Patent Office seeking
reexamination of the three
patents-in-suit.
These reexamination requests were granted in May and June 2009
and were merged in September 2009 with the reexaminations
earlier filed by Vistaprint Technologies Limited. The Company is
unable to express an opinion as to the likely outcome of any
such reexamination or of the underlying lawsuit.
On July 29, 2008, a purported class action lawsuit was
filed in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Texas (the Texas Complaint) against
Vistaprint Corp., Vistaprint USA, Inc., Vertrue, Inc. and
Adaptive Marketing, LLC (collectively, the
Defendants). Adaptive Marketing, LLC is a Vertrue,
Inc. company that provides subscription-based membership
discount programs, including programs that are offered on our
Vistaprint.com website (Vertrue, Inc. and Adaptive Marketing,
LLC are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the
Vertrue Defendants). The Texas Complaint alleges
that the Defendants violated, among other statutes, the
Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer
Protection Act and the Texas Theft Liability Act, in connection
with certain membership discount programs offered to our
customers on our Vistaprint.com website. The Texas Complaint
also seeks recovery for unjust enrichment, conversion, and
similar common law claims. Subsequent to the filing of the Texas
complaint, in July, August and September 2008, several nearly
identical purported class action lawsuits were filed in the
United States District Court, District of New Jersey, the United
States District Court, Southern District of Alabama, the United
States District Court, District of Nevada, the United States
District Court, District of Massachusetts, and the United States
District Court, District of Florida against the same Defendants,
and in one case Vistaprint Limited, on behalf of different
plaintiffs. The complaints in each of these nearly identical
lawsuits include substantially the same purported Federal and
common law claims as the Texas Complaint but contain different
state law claims. In addition, on August 28, 2008, a
purported class action lawsuit asserting substantially the same
Federal and common law claims as the Texas Complaint, but
containing a state law claim under the Massachusetts Unfair
Trade Practices Act, was filed by a different plaintiff in the
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts,
against Vistaprint Limited, Vistaprint USA, Inc. and the Vertrue
Defendants.
Among other allegations, the plaintiffs in each action claim
that after ordering products on our Vistaprint.com website they
were enrolled in certain membership discount programs operated
by the Vertrue Defendants and that monthly subscription fees for
the programs were subsequently charged directly to the credit or
debit cards they used to make purchases on Vistaprint.com, in
each case purportedly without their knowledge or authorization.
The plaintiffs also claim that the Defendants failed to disclose
to them that the credit or debit card information they provided
to make purchases on Vistaprint.com would be disclosed to the
Vertrue Defendants and would be used to pay for monthly
subscriptions for the membership discount programs. The
plaintiffs have requested that the Defendants be enjoined from
engaging in the practices complained of by the plaintiffs. They
also are seeking an unspecified amount of damages, including
statutory and punitive damages, as well as pre-judgment and
post-judgment interest and attorneys fees and costs for
the purported class.
88
In response to opposing motions filed by the plaintiffs and the
Defendants, on December 11, 2008, the Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation ordered the transfer of all of the
outstanding cases to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas for coordinated pretrial proceedings.
As a result of the ruling of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, on March 2, 2009 four of the existing
plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Complaint with the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
On August 31, 2009, the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Texas dismissed all of the claims
against the Defendants and ruled on substantive grounds that the
Defendants had not violated any of the statutes or common law
claims cited by the plaintiffs. In September 2009, the
plaintiffs filed an appeal with the U.S. Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals, and on August 23, 2010, the Court of
Appeals affirmed the District Courts ruling and dismissal.
On June 26, 2009, Vistaprint Limited, the Companys
wholly owned subsidiary, and Vistaprint USA, Incorporated, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Vistaprint Limited, together with
sixteen other companies unaffiliated with Vistaprint Limited or
Vistaprint USA, Incorporated, were named as defendants in a
complaint for patent infringement by Soverain Software LLC in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas. The complaint alleges that the named defendants are
infringing U.S. Patents 5,715,314, 5,909,492 and 7,272,639.
Two of the asserted patents relate generally to network-based
sales systems employing a customer computer, a shopping cart
computer and a shopping cart database. The third patent relates
generally to the use of session identifiers in connection with
requests transmitted through a network between a client and a
server. The plaintiff is seeking declarations that the patents
at issue are valid and enforceable and that the defendants
infringe the patents, as well as the entry of a preliminary and
permanent injunction and damages. The Company is unable to
express an opinion as to its likely outcome.
On July 21, 2009, Vistaprint Limited and OfficeMax
Incorporated were named as defendants in a complaint for patent
infringement filed by ColorQuick LLC in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint
alleges that Vistaprint Limited and OfficeMax Incorporated are
infringing U.S. patent 6,839,149, relating generally to
systems and methods for processing electronic files stored in a
page description language format, such as PDF. The plaintiff is
seeking a declaration that the patent at issue is valid and
enforceable, a declaration that Vistaprint Limited infringes,
the entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction, and
damages. The Company is unable to express an opinion as to its
likely outcome.
The Company is not currently party to any other material legal
proceedings. The Company is involved, from time to time, in
various legal proceedings arising from the normal course of
business activities. Although the results of litigation and
claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not
expect resolution of these matters to have a material adverse
impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or
financial position. However, an unfavorable resolution of such a
proceeding could, depending on its amount and timing, materially
affect the Companys results of operations, cash flows or
financial position in a future period. Regardless of the
outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company
because of defense costs, diversion of management resources and
other factors.
|
|
13.
|
Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
|
The Company offsets gross trade accounts receivable with an
allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful
accounts is the Companys best estimate of the amount of
probable credit losses in the Companys existing accounts
receivable. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful
accounts on a monthly basis and all past due balances are
reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are
charged off against the allowance after all means of collection
have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered
remote.
89
Below is a summary of the changes in the Companys
allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended
June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
|
|
|
offs/
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
Recovery
|
|
|
End of Period
|
|
|
Year ended June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
(119
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
Year ended June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
Year ended June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
145,091
|
|
|
$
|
194,612
|
|
|
$
|
166,029
|
|
|
$
|
164,303
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
52,865
|
|
|
|
67,876
|
|
|
|
59,659
|
|
|
|
59,795
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
12,976
|
|
|
|
26,948
|
|
|
|
16,167
|
|
|
|
11,650
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
114,232
|
|
|
$
|
138,903
|
|
|
$
|
127,523
|
|
|
$
|
135,168
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
44,844
|
|
|
|
50,692
|
|
|
|
46,583
|
|
|
|
49,825
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
8,273
|
|
|
|
18,549
|
|
|
|
14,166
|
|
|
|
14,698
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive
officer and our chief financial officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
June 30, 2010. The term disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a
company that are designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
a company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
companys management, including its principal executive and
principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes
that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving
their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment
in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls
and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2010, our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as
of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective at the reasonable assurance level.
91
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting for the
company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, the companys principal executive
and principal financial officers and effected by the
companys supervisory board, management and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and includes those
policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company;
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and
|
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010. In
making this assessment, our management used the criteria set
forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
Based on our assessment, management concluded that, as of
June 30, 2010, our internal control over financial
reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Our independent auditors have issued an audit report on internal
control over financial reporting. This report appears below.
92
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Supervisory Board and Shareholders of
Vistaprint N.V.
We have audited Vistaprint N.V.s (previously Vistaprint
Limited) internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO
criteria). Vistaprint N.V.s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Vistaprint N.V. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of June 30, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Vistaprint N.V. as of
June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended June 30, 2010 and our report dated
August 27, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Boston, Massachusetts
August 27, 2010
93
Changes in
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
No changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B
|
Other
Information
|
None.
94
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the Sections
captioned Our Supervisory Board, Our
Management Board, Corporate Governance and
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance contained in our definitive proxy statement for
our 2010 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, which we refer
to as our 2010 Proxy Statement.
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics
that applies to our principal executive officer, principal
financial or accounting officer or person serving similar
functions, and to all of our employees. The text of our code of
business conduct and ethics is available on our website at
www.vistaprint.com. We did not waive any provisions of the code
of business conduct and ethics during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2010. If we amend, or grant a waiver under, our
code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our
principal executive officer, principal financial or accounting
officer, or persons performing similar functions, we intend to
post information about such amendment or waiver on our website
at www.vistaprint.com.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference herein to our 2010 Proxy Statement under the sections
captioned Executive Compensation, Compensation
of Supervisory Board Members and Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference herein to our 2010 Proxy Statement under the sections
captioned Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management and Securities Authorized for
Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference herein to our 2010 Proxy Statement under the sections
captioned Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions and Corporate Governance.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference herein to our 2010 Proxy Statement under the section
captioned Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Fees and Other Matters.
95
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Consolidated Financial Statements.
For a list of the consolidated financial information included
herein, see Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements on
page 58 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
(b) List of Exhibits.
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately
preceding the exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules.
All schedules have been omitted because the information required
to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
96
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
August 27,
2010 Vistaprint
N.V.
Robert S. Keane
Chief Executive
Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
S. Keane
Robert
S. Keane
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive
officer)
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
Giannetto
Michael
Giannetto
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal financial and accounting
officer)
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
J. Gavin, Jr.
John
J. Gavin, Jr.
|
|
Member, Supervisory Board
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter
Gyenes
Peter
Gyenes
|
|
Member, Supervisory Board
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ George
M. Overholser
George
M. Overholser
|
|
Member, Supervisory Board
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Louis
Page
Louis
Page
|
|
Member, Supervisory Board
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
Riley
Richard
Riley
|
|
Chairman, Supervisory Board
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark
Thomas
Mark
Thomas
|
|
Member, Supervisory Board
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
97
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Association of Vistaprint N.V., as amended, is
incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on August 31, 2009
|
10.1*
|
|
Amended and Restated
2000-2002 Share
Incentive Plan, as amended, is incorporated by reference to our
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
10.2*
|
|
Form of Nonqualified Share Option Agreement under our
2000-2002 Share
Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to our Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
as amended
(File No. 333-125470)
|
10.3*
|
|
Form of Incentive Share Option Agreement under our
2000-2002 Share
Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to our Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
as amended
(File No. 333-125470)
|
10.4*
|
|
2005 Non-Employee Directors Share Option Plan, as amended,
is incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
10.5*
|
|
Form of Nonqualified Share Option Agreement under our 2005
Non-Employee Directors Share Option Plan, as amended, is
incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
10.6*
|
|
Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan is incorporated
by reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
10.7*
|
|
Form of Nonqualified Share Option Agreement under our Amended
and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan is incorporated by
reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
10.8*
|
|
Form of Incentive Share Option Agreement under our Amended and
Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference
to our Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
as amended (File
No. 333-125470)
|
10.9*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement under our Amended and
Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference
to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
10.10*
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement for Supervisory Board
members under our Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan is incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
10.11*
|
|
Performance Incentive Plan for Covered Employees is incorporated
by reference to Appendix A to our Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A dated and filed with the SEC on
October 23, 2009
|
10.12*
|
|
Form of Annual Award Agreement under our Performance Incentive
Plan for Covered Employees is incorporated by reference to our
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
10.13*
|
|
Form of Four-Year Award Agreement under our Performance
Incentive Plan for Covered Employees is incorporated by
reference to our
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
10.14*
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Vistaprint N.V. and
each of the members of our Supervisory Board and Management
Board is incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on August 31, 2009
|
10.15*
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Retention Agreement between
Vistaprint N.V. and Robert S. Keane dated as of October 23,
2009 is incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
10.16*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Executive Retention Agreement
between Vistaprint N.V. and each of Wendy Cebula, Michael
Giannetto and Janet F. Holian is incorporated by reference to
our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
10.17*
|
|
Employment Agreement between Vistaprint USA, Incorporated and
Robert S. Keane effective September 1, 2009 is incorporated
by reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
98
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
10.18*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between Vistaprint
USA, Incorporated and Robert S. Keane dated June 14, 2010
|
10.19*
|
|
Memorandum clarifying relative precedence of agreements between
Vistaprint N.V. and Robert S. Keane dated May 6, 2010
|
10.20*
|
|
Form of Invention and Non-Disclosure Agreement between
Vistaprint USA, Incorporated and each of Robert S. Keane, Janet
F. Holian, Wendy Cebula and Michael Giannetto is incorporated by
reference to our Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
as amended (File
No. 333-125470)
|
10.21*
|
|
Form of Confidential Information and Non-Competition Agreement
between Vistaprint USA, Incorporated and each of Robert S.
Keane, Janet F. Holian, Wendy Cebula and Michael Giannetto is
incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
as amended (File
No. 333-125470)
|
10.22
|
|
Barcelona Expatriate Agreement between Vistaprint USA,
Incorporated and Janet Holian dated March 11, 2010 is
incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on March 15, 2010
|
10.23
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement between Comerica Bank and Vistaprint
North American Services Corp. dated as of November 1, 2004
is incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
as amended (File
No. 333-125470)
|
10.24
|
|
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between Comerica
Bank and Vistaprint North American Services Corp. dated as of
December 15, 2005 is incorporated by reference to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 15, 2005
|
10.25
|
|
Lease dated October 4, 2006 between Vistaprint USA,
Incorporated and Ledgemont Research Park Associates II L.P.
is incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 10, 2006
|
10.26
|
|
Unconditional Guaranty dated October 4, 2006 by Vistaprint
Limited is incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 10, 2006
|
10.27
|
|
Call Option Agreement between Vistaprint N.V. and Stichting
Continuïteit Vistaprint dated November 16, 2009 is
incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on November 19, 2009
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Vistaprint N.V.
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a),
by Chief Executive Officer
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,
Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a),
by Chief Financial Officer
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
99
exv10w18
Exhibit 10.18
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement is entered into this June 14, 2010 by Vistaprint
USA, Incorporated (the Company) and Robert S. Keane (the Employee). The Company and the
Employee previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2009 (the Agreement)
and now wish to amend the Agreement to reflect the Employees compensation for the Companys 2011
fiscal year.
The parties agree as follows:
1. Compensation and Benefits.
1.1 Salary. The Company shall pay the Employee, in accordance with the Companys
regular payroll practices, an annualized base salary of $72,468 (approximate, based on the 30-day
trailing average currency exchange rate in effect at May 5, 2010) for the one-year period
commencing on July 1, 2010.
1.2 FY 2011 Incentive Compensation. The Employee is entitled to receive the bonuses,
incentive awards and equity compensation awards for the Companys fiscal year 2011 described on
Schedule A.
1.3 Withholding. All salary, bonus and other compensation payable to the Employee is
subject to applicable withholding taxes.
2. No Other Modification. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, the
Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
The parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VISTAPRINT USA, INCORPORATED
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael Giannetto
|
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYEE
|
|
|
/s/ Robert S. Keane
|
|
|
Robert S. Keane |
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE A
Compensation Payable by the Company for fiscal year 2011
Annual base salary of $72,468*.
Annual incentive, pursuant to the terms of the Employees award agreement under the Vistaprint
Performance Incentive Plan for Covered Employees:
Target (100%) of $531,212*
Minimum (0%) of $0
Maximum (250%) of $1,328,031*
Long-term cash incentive, pursuant to the terms of the Employees award agreement under the
Vistaprint Performance Incentive Plan for Covered Employees:
Target (4 years) of $562,500
Minimum (4 years) of $0
Maximum (4 years) of $1,040,625
Long-term equity incentive, pursuant to the terms of the Employees grant agreements under the
Vistaprint Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan:
Share options with Black Scholes value of $2,812,500
Restricted share units with value at grant of $2,250,000
|
|
|
* |
|
Approximate, based on the 30-day trailing average currency exchange rate in effect at May 5, 2010 |
exv10w19
Exhibit 10.19
This memorandum is intended to clarify the relationship among the agreements you have entered
into, or may in the future enter into, with Vistaprint N.V. and/or its direct and indirect
subsidiaries (each a Vistaprint Company and collectively the Vistaprint Companies) relating to
your activities and/or compensation related to the Vistaprint Companies and your service on the
Management Board of Vistaprint N.V. (each an Agreement and collectively the Agreements). In
the event of a conflict between this letter and any Agreement, the terms of this letter shall
govern.
With respect to the Amended and Restated Executive Retention Agreement dated October 23, 2009
between you and Vistaprint N.V. (the Retention Agreement), all terms relating to compensation in
the Retention Agreement, including but not limited to base salary, bonus, award, equity, payment
and benefit, refer to 100% of the compensation that you receive or are entitled to receive from the
Vistaprint Companies in the aggregate, including but not limited to Vistaprint N.V., Vistaprint
USA, Incorporated and Vistaprint SARL.
With respect to any Agreement and any document or policy implemented by any Vistaprint Company, it
is not the intention that any such Agreement, document or policy will invalidate or supersede the
Retention Agreement, unless otherwise specifically indicated. In the event of a conflict between
any such Agreement, document or policy and the Retention Agreement, the terms of the Retention
Agreement shall govern. Further, it is understood and acknowledged that individual Agreements may
address individual components of your compensation, but the total amount of your compensation for
your services to the collective Vistaprint Companies, the components of such compensation and the
currency in which each component is paid are determined by the Supervisory Board of Vistaprint N.V.
In the event of a conflict between an Agreement and the Supervisory Boards current or future
resolutions, the applicable resolutions shall govern.
This letter agreement may be modified or terminated only by a written instrument executed by both
parties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
/s/ Robert S. Keane
|
|
|
|
Date May 21, 2010 |
|
|
Robert S. Keane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vistaprint N.V.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
/s/ Richard T. Riley
|
|
|
|
Date June 7, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard T. Riley,
Chairman of the Supervisory Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
/s/ Michael Giannetto
|
|
|
|
Date May 25, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Giannetto,
Member of the Management Board |
|
|
|
|
exv21w1
Exhibit 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF VISTAPRINT N.V.
|
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
Jurisdiction |
|
|
|
Soft Sight, Inc.
|
|
Delaware, USA |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Australia Pty Ltd
|
|
Australia |
|
|
|
Vistaprint B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Canada Limited
|
|
Nova Scotia, Canada |
|
|
|
Vistaprint S.A.R.L.
|
|
France |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Espana S.L.
|
|
Spain |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Germany GmbH
|
|
Germany |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Jamaica Limited
|
|
Jamaica |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Japan LLC
|
|
Japan |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Limited
|
|
Bermuda |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Netherlands B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
|
|
Vistaprint North American Services Corp.
|
|
Nova Scotia, Canada |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Schweiz GmbH
|
|
Switzerland |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Technologies Limited
|
|
Bermuda |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Technologies Private Limited
|
|
India |
|
|
|
Vistaprint Tunisie SARL
|
|
Tunisia |
|
|
|
Vistaprint USA, Incorporated
|
|
Delaware, USA |
exv23w1
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8
Nos. 333-129912, 333-133797, and 333-147753) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2000-2002 Share
Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the Amended and Restated
2005 Non-Employee Directors Share Option Plan of our reports dated August 27, 2010, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Vistaprint N.V. (previously Vistaprint Limited), and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Vistaprint N.V., included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2010.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 27, 2010
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert S. Keane, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vistaprint N.V.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
|
|
|
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
|
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
|
|
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
|
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: August 27, 2010
|
|
|
/s/ Robert S. Keane |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Michael Giannetto, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vistaprint N.V.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
|
|
|
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
|
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
|
|
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
|
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. |
Date: August 27, 2010
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
Giannetto |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vistaprint N.V. (the Company) for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Robert S. Keane, Chief Executive Officer, and Michael
Giannetto, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 27, 2010 |
/s/ Robert S. Keane
|
|
|
Robert S. Keane |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael Giannetto
|
|
|
Michael Giannetto |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Vistaprint N.V. and will be retained by Vistaprint N.V. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.